SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-18-07, 10:18 AM   #1
jbt308
Torpedoman
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 118
Downloads: 23
Uploads: 0
Default Am I TOO good a skipper?

Well, I know I'm not the best, but I'm just wondering if I'm sinking too many ships? Granted, I play on full realism minus the manual TDC, but I still think my sinkings are far too high.

I'm on patrol 4 I believe, and each cruise I rack up about 40-50k tons. I look at the log board back at Pearl and I've got something like 124k tons to my name, the next highest has about 30k. I'm running Trigger Maru and that's really it for gameplay enhancements. Is it because there are too many ships?

In SH3 I used manual targetting, but I would use the weapons office to calculate a solution for me, I didn't see that option in SH4? Or am I missing something? I'd like to go back to this setup.

Thanks,
jbt308 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-07, 10:19 AM   #2
mookiemookie
Navy Seal
 
mookiemookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,404
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 1
Default

Use the manual targeting. Your tonnage WILL go down.

As far as I know, the weapons officer solution function isn't present in SH4
__________________
They don’t think it be like it is, but it do.

Want more U-boat Kaleun portraits for your SH3 Commander Profiles? Download the SH3 Commander Portrait Pack here.
mookiemookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-07, 10:23 AM   #3
jbt308
Torpedoman
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 118
Downloads: 23
Uploads: 0
Default

I was sort of dreading that answer, as I thought the Officer option struck a good balance. I'll have to run some training missions and see how I do.

Btw, your tagline, awesome
jbt308 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-07, 10:30 AM   #4
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Yes, it is partly because you encounter way too many ships. If it was truly realistic, a lot of people would never buy it.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-07, 10:38 AM   #5
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

It is after all a game.
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-07, 10:46 AM   #6
mookiemookie
Navy Seal
 
mookiemookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,404
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 1
Default

I think tater's improved campaign layers are a godsend. I really enjoy the reduced and smaller contacts. It makes sinking the big ones so much more rewarding.

If you see an unescorted huge european liner every day, it becomes no big deal. If you see one maybe once or twice a career and everytime, it's escorted by 3 DD's, your heart starts pounding a little faster when you move in for the kill.

Maybe you should try that mod, jbt. It can be found here: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=116283
__________________
They don’t think it be like it is, but it do.

Want more U-boat Kaleun portraits for your SH3 Commander Profiles? Download the SH3 Commander Portrait Pack here.
mookiemookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-07, 10:48 AM   #7
Rockin Robbins
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DeLand, FL
Posts: 8,900
Downloads: 135
Uploads: 52


Default Tonnage per cruise

In my experience running manual targeting, cruise tonnage of 30-50 kilotons is difficult to avoid. I do not reload and double-dip a cruise. This is a defect in the simulation in my judgment, but it does nothing to lessen my enjoyment of the game.

Taking US war averages of 1 ship sunk for every 6 torpedoes expended, your load of 24 torpedoes should sink 4 ships x 5,000 tons for a decent sized merchant = 20k tons. It's easy to see that we're overachievers here from the average.

That's because we can get close to one ship for every 3 torpedoes. But it is a game and gameplay must sometimes take precedence over realism or we wouldn't have players. Every once in awhile I like to do a mission with super torpedoes and play a little Quake just to have some excessive fun.
Rockin Robbins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-07, 10:59 AM   #8
letterboy1
Captain
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Columbus, GA, USA
Posts: 525
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
Default

Something else to look into is mods that make it more challenging. For instance the Natural Sinking Mechanics mod.

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=118005

It makes it more challenging to sink a ship. Read the thread to see why.
__________________
Asus P8 Z68 Deluxe MoBo
Intel Core i7 @ 4.4 GHz
16 GB RAM
EVGA GTX Titan Black
1.5 T-byte HDD
Antec 1 KW True Power Quattro PS
letterboy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-07, 11:33 AM   #9
jbt308
Torpedoman
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 118
Downloads: 23
Uploads: 0
Default

I believe the NSM is actually part of Trigger Maru, and I've had some issues with it in the past where ships would just refuse to sink.

As another poster said, I think the amount of shipping is way too high, and should it be lessened, sinking the larger stuff would be much more of a "deal" rather than seeing them on every cruise.
jbt308 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-07, 11:42 AM   #10
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,281
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Look at Taters mod and look at Run Silent Run Deep which I believe incorporates Taters mod. Much more realistic shipping and ship types.
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-07, 11:51 AM   #11
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

RSRD is different, but we share a few things in both directions (imagine that, "competing" mods sharing stuff!).

He used a few of my initial files as baselines, I've taken a few idea from lurker, along with a lot of help with my DCs, etc. I'm taking Momi, too for my next version

The two share many basic concepts, however, and are very similar in many ways. We both use the same tool to zig-zag, and in fact, lurker helped me with much of my scripting work until I got a better feel for it myself. We share a similar outlook on traffic volumes, etc. The real differences are that while I am starting to TROM base the heavy units, his TF/battle layers are mostly TROM based (all large units, basically).

I think that the TROM model has a ton of potential, my only concern about it is really replayability. Where possible some alternate paths for TROM groups can mitigate many of the concerns, however. Of course if a RL TF took X days to go from A to B, there is not a huge amount of variability possible in many cases to get there in time.

tater
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-07, 12:18 PM   #12
Digital_Trucker
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Peach State
Posts: 4,171
Downloads: 141
Uploads: 10
Default

The NSM compatible hard core torpedo mod will help also. Warning, it does get rather frustrating watching all those fish running around in circles and diving to ridiculous depths under the vessel you are aiming for. It's available at http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=122205
__________________

RSM-GIEP-Killflags-LV Tribute-Playable Elco __Peace be with you, Dave.

Digital_Trucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-07, 12:19 PM   #13
Galanti
Captain
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 536
Downloads: 106
Uploads: 0
Default

Well sometimes you have to be careful what you wish for.

I've been playing fairly regularly since release, and have always bemoaned the overabundance of targets and the ease of sinking them. Now of course, we have NSM, Taters layers and the hardcore torpedoes mod which are absolutely essential for any degree of realistic tonnage in this sim. And so in all this time I have never sunk anything larger than a heavy cruiser, and that only once.

Until last night...in the East China Sea, I came across 2 Hiryu CVs, and 2 Atagos escorted by around 6-10 destroyers and a CL. It was a fairly easy approach in heavy seas, and all the while I remember thinking, you've waited eight months for this, that Hiryu is yours! Thanks to the mods mentioned, I felt no guilt at yet another easy kill, more infalted tonnage, just anticipation at my long-awaited reward! I took my time, set my fish to run slow and at 20-30 degrees gyro to minimize duds and launched four fish at a range of 3200 yards. All four hit and the Hiryu went dead in the water and listed heavily to starboard.

I went deep and was immediately pounced on by the cans. And waited for the Hiryu to sink.

And wouldn't you know it, the damn thing never did.
Galanti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-07, 12:21 PM   #14
PapaG39
Frogman
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 297
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

Grab a type IID boat.
Unless you sink a ship with every one of the 6 torpedoes and every and ship you sink is 10000 pounds, your score should go down...lol..
PapaG39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-07, 12:40 PM   #15
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

BTW, the DC mod I released (still kinda beta) can be used to mitigate TM's AI a little since the escorts will have fewer ashcans to drop on you.

tater
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.