SHV may be a flop because no one cares anymore

Onkel Neal · 02-03-10, 09:03 PM

I guess I'm just a sucker for blanket statements that don't ring true: SH3 would have been a flop. SH3 is not a simulation because you cannot turn some widget or control the #3 ngative ballast tank or you cannot take specific gravity readings of each battery. SH3 was not as good a subsim as .... ?

Mods giving a game staying power, that makes sense to me. And I can find that easy to agree with, I think you are right. But I don't know about how many people bought SH3 because of RUB or GWX. Certainly most people who bought SH3 were delighted to add mods to it.

02-03-10, 09:03 PM	#11
Onkel Neal Born to Run Silent Join Date: Jan 1997 Location: Cougar Trap, Texas Posts: 21,385 Downloads: 541 Uploads: 224	I guess I'm just a sucker for blanket statements that don't ring true: SH3 would have been a flop. SH3 is not a simulation because you cannot turn some widget or control the #3 ngative ballast tank or you cannot take specific gravity readings of each battery. SH3 was not as good a subsim as .... ? Mods giving a game staying power, that makes sense to me. And I can find that easy to agree with, I think you are right. But I don't know about how many people bought SH3 because of RUB or GWX. Certainly most people who bought SH3 were delighted to add mods to it. __________________ SUBSIM - 26 Years on the Web