Malaysia airlines B777 missing

[CCIP]

Again, based on what? We're talking about very different things here. And even the cellphone thing is absurd, because we all know how effective all that has been - militias in Iraq and Afghanistan are stronger than ever. Heroin and cocaine prices in the US are at an all time low, because deliveries by land, sea and air are getting through and supply is high.

But none of that matters because where's the technology? If you can actually demonstrate the type of radar or other satellite sensor capable of this kind of surveillance at the level of coverage needed to track planes in even more remote parts of the world, then we'll see.

If history teaches us anything though, capabilities of new sensor technologies have typically been over-valued in peacetime, only to be found wholly deficient during war.

[Jimbuna]

My wish would be that the technological capability did exist and a 'lucky find' could be attributed to the planes location but I think had the aforementioned been possible then an announcement would have been made a long time ago.

[scorpiondown]

Who knows what exists...Bin laden was tracked from the US ,not from Pakistan or Afghanistan..Put under surveillance there once he was found...I can sit at this computer as any of you can..and track any flight in real-time..I watch when friends are flying in and track the flight the whole time..there is something fishy with them claiming they don,t know the flight plan..They let out that some sort of signal is automatically sent from every plane to satellites and it is not able to disable this from the cockpit(in effect ,a tracker)..If the oceans were being monitored 50 years ago with SOSUS,,why would today be any different?
https://www.strategypage.com/dls/art...m-2-5-2011.asp BTW what is that BETBET thing in my last post??????

if this article was let out,other capabilities far beyond that are NOT being let out..Just like the US stealth fighters and bombers...If these were officially released to the press,,
that means something else has taken its place and has made that system almost obsolete...

Have to answer the "heroin" thing..Too much money involved for someone (who knows who) not to look the other way,,so many cases of cops only busting druggies after NOT getting their pay-offs..Always been that way,, will always stay that way..even during prohibition...Corruption is just doing business.

http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/techno...acoustics.html

[Herr-Berbunch]

Originally Posted by scorpiondown

whether you want to believe that the US has the WHOLE world under surveillance or not is up to you....I wouldn,t bet against it after recent things have been revealed..As for the technology ,,better believe it! 1984 is here!Ask those terrorists in the middle of nowhere if they believe it..Oh sorry, they can,t answer because of that drone hellfire that atomized them! Us a cell phone and you are pin-pointed if they are looking for you..think anyone on that plane tried to use their phones?

Terrorists or wedding party? Seems all the same, all too often with modern technology.

[mapuc]

^ scorpiondown, you're right some of the western countries have the technologies as you mentioned However and it is a big however.

You have to place some of these satellite over the area of where the plane went missing. What I understand USA has placed 2-3 of these satellite above following countries/area: North Korea, Syria/Iran or middle east and Ukraine/West Russia.

The area we speak of is not a political hot spot therefore no area of satellite surveillance.

Just for your information I'm talking about military spy satellite.

Markus

[scorpiondown]

China is the reason that area would be covered with surveillance...The US is worried about China increasing it,s naval capacity...I live near Cape Canaveral and there are always classified payload launches that are only covered on the news around here so people can watch the lift-offs..What are they???only can guess..More than just a few of those satellites lurking around up there..Military has an Un-limited budget especially for security reasons..Between US base in Diego Garcia,,Antarctica and Australian assets...Indian ocean is pretty well covered i,d think..

[August]

Originally Posted by scorpiondown

whether you want to believe that the US has the WHOLE world under surveillance or not is up to you....I wouldn,t bet against it after recent things have been revealed..As for the technology ,,better believe it! 1984 is here!Ask those terrorists in the middle of nowhere if they believe it..Oh sorry, they can,t answer because of that drone hellfire that atomized them! Us a cell phone and you are pin-pointed if they are looking for you..think anyone on that plane tried to use their phones?

Hellfire?

FYI Cell phones don't work at 30kft. No missiles required.

[TarJak]

Originally Posted by scorpiondown

I can sit at this computer as any of you can..and track any flight in real-time..I watch when friends are flying in and track the flight the whole time..there is something fishy with them claiming they don,t know the flight plan..They let out that some sort of signal is automatically sent from every plane to satellites and it is not able to disable this from the cockpit(in effect ,a tracker)..

Missed the part about the transponder stopping about an hour into the flight did you?

If the oceans were being monitored 50 years ago with SOSUS,,why would today be any different?
https://www.strategypage.com/dls/art...m-2-5-2011.asp

Not sure how SONUS or similar would help in this case. We're talking about hearing a single splash in a very large ocean on a system designed to pick up a submarine. If any sensors picked the crash then why wait to say so? Hiding some supposedly secret technology is not enough.

Posting speculative nonsense is pointless.

[TarJak]

Originally Posted by guntherprien

I know this sounds conspiracy bs,but my friend of a friend of a friend.ad infinitum,

If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck....

[guntherprien]

Originally Posted by TarJak

If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck....

And you know better,do you ?

[TarJak]

They don't work too well 4km under water either.

[BossMark]

The search for Flight 370 was declared "The most difficult in human history."

Amelia Earhart could not be reached for comment...

[TarJak]

Closing in but still no cigar: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-1...ck-box/5384164

[Admiral Halsey]

Originally Posted by BossMark

The search for Flight 370 was declared "The most difficult in human history."

Amelia Earhart could not be reached for comment...

Is it bad that this made me laugh?

[swamprat69er]

Originally Posted by privateer

Not really.
She told me that last night through the Wee Gee board!

She also told me they are useing one to locate the wreck.


Yes. I'm a sick SOB!