PERFECT SIM! What can we make out of SH5/SH3?

[tonschk]

Originally Posted by rik007

At the last day of the year we now can all look back. Everybody is disappointed by SH5. Ubi had everything to make that the perfect Sim. I never understood why they didnot reuse SH3 as a base for SH5 or even SH4. The immersion in SH3 with GWX and other mods such as FM New Interior remains on top. Because it is simple and gives you the best feeling how it should have been some 70 years ago.

At the last day of the year we now can all look back. Everybody is disappointed by SH3. Ubi had everything to make that the perfect Sim

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by tonschk

Everybody is disappointed by SH3.

Not everybody. Only you.

Oh, and I've refrained from mentioning it since in the SH5 forums I'm only a visitory, but since you've decided to make yourself annoying here I think it's time to suggest you read the rules on sig.

Sigs that are political or religous in nature may only be displayed in General Topics. Only naval-oriented sigs are allowed in the naval and game forums.

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/faq....ure_image_faqs

[Jimbuna]

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

Not everybody. Only you.

Oh, and I've refrained from mentioning it since in the SH5 forums I'm only a visitory, but since you've decided to make yourself annoying here I think it's time to suggest you read the rules on sig.

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/faq....ure_image_faqs

Careful Steve, it is just possible his forum password has been 'compromised' AGAIN and somebody is posting using his name

[Reece]

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

Not everybody. Only you.

Oh, and I've refrained from mentioning it since in the SH5 forums I'm only a visitory, but since you've decided to make yourself annoying here I think it's time to suggest you read the rules on sig.

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/faq....ure_image_faqs

Easy does it Policeman Steve, I think it is a typo, I think he meant SH5, if so I would agree!

[Stiebler]

@Rik007:

I said in my post above:

You really cannot blame the devs.

Sorry Rik, I intended to use the word 'you' as an impersonal plural, as in 'One really cannot blame the devs.'

I did not intend to refer to you personally.

Stiebler.

[rik007]

Originally Posted by Stiebler

@Rik007:

I said in my post above: Sorry Rik, I intended to use the word 'you' as an impersonal plural, as in 'One really cannot blame the devs.'

I did not intend to refer to you personally.

Stiebler.

No problem at all. As far as a blaim goes: the devs could have structured the code more so SH3 could have been reused but they were undoubtedly under time-pressure and other restrictions. Still SH3 remains the top-game. It should have been the base for the sequel. The game-engine should then have been preserved as it has a good balance. Of course debugged and improved while the eye-candy could then have been added as well as all the other feauture we all miss.

But of course I'm dreaming now. Probably the maximum is that we can export the 3D objects from SH5 into 3D Max - as already achieved - and import them into SH3. After playing for some time with SH5 my opinion is that it will never fly. Maybe I should try it again but I rather spent my time in campaigning in SH3.

[JCWolf]

Oops......

I think he meant sh5 as Reece says!

Thought his sig really is a political argumentation and might even be considered a offense to others and lack of respect for a country.

I think Steve just targeted his Sig, I Would do the same, this sig is
of very bad taste.

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by JCWolf

I think he meant sh5 as Reece says!

No, he is on record saying SH5 is the best thing since sliced bread and anything SH3 is garbage. I can understand his anger at the people who trolled the SH5 boards with nothing but complaints, but that doesn't mean he needs to come here and do the same. What makes it worse is that he is not someone who ever discusses the situation - he only makes limited one-time statements such as the one in this thread.

A favorite quote from Benjamin Franklin, which in my opinion applies to him perfectly: "Praise-All and Blame-All are two blockheads".

[Robin40]

Originally Posted by rik007

No problem at all. As far as a blaim goes: the devs could have structured the code more so SH3 could have been reused but they were undoubtedly under time-pressure and other restrictions. Still SH3 remains the top-game. It should have been the base for the sequel. The game-engine should then have been preserved as it has a good balance. Of course debugged and improved while the eye-candy could then have been added as well as all the other feauture we all miss.

But of course I'm dreaming now. Probably the maximum is that we can export the 3D objects from SH5 into 3D Max - as already achieved - and import them into SH3. After playing for some time with SH5 my opinion is that it will never fly. Maybe I should try it again but I rather spent my time in campaigning in SH3.

That's THE idea....

[urfisch]

yep...this is the maximum. but we also may get some fx-effects from sh5 into sh3. fire, smoke, etc...