![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#11 | ||
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Raid on the Medway Battle of Beachy Head Battle of Chesapeake Bay Battle of the Coronel Quote:
KMS Prinz Eugen - Commissioned 1940 HMS Hood - Commissioned 1920 HMS Prince of Wales - Commissioned 1941 See the problem here? The Hood, although one of the loved ships of the Royal Navy, was an old Battlecruiser, really not designed to take on something like the Bismarck. The more equal opponent to the Bismarck would be the King George V. Yes, the Bismarck did inflict a nasty shock to a navy which was almost arrogant in its confidence in its superiority, but it wasn't the only one. The uboat campaign was another nasty shock, as were Japanese aircraft. In return, well, let's remember what crippled the Bismarck, a very slow, very outdated biplane. ![]() ![]() The Tirpitz acted well as a threat, just as Argentinas submarines acted well as a threat towards the Falklands fleet, but there was no way for Germany to carry out that threat, but of course, Britain did not know that and so expended resources to eliminate the threat. In my opinion, the Kriegsmarine surface fleet was mostly a waste of time and resources that could have been spent improving and expanding the uboatwaffe, but then I'm a bit of Doenitz fan so I would go for the 300 uboats over Plan Z. ![]() http://uboat.net/forums/read.php?3,285,554 |
||
![]() |
|
|