[WIP] Candy for the eyes VII-D Playabel

[Myxale]

Don't worry Neuro! I'm sure Tomi will take care of the Non-GWX version as soon as beta-in is done!:up:

[Tomi_099]

Abstecher in die Wilden Gewässer !!! :ping:


:sunny:
http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=133658

[Wolfehunter]

Tomi my friend pls clean your PM's its full dude.:up:

[Myxale]

Tomi habe das Boot etwas getestet...und es ist echt der hammer! Es is ein sehr tolles Boot! Klasse arbeit!

Habe aber leider leichter texture flicker im unteren Heck-Torpedobereich entdeckt!

Werde versuchen diese mit einem screeny einzufangen.

[Letum]

http://www.b3tards.com/u/57a418c694bc7c6296b3/viic41.jpg

[Jimbuna]

Very nice Tomi http://www.psionguild.org/forums/images/smilies/wolfsmilies/thumbsup.gif

[Uber Gruber]

Thankyou Tomi, I would like to shake your hand!

:up:

[Tomi_099]

http://www.b3tards.com/u/57a418c694bc7c6296b3/viic41.jpg


---------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
COOOOOLLLLLLLLL !!!!!:up: :up:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------

[schnorchel]

Hi Tomi,

there is a bad news!:damn:
Try to use your boat to play the single mission U505. you will find that the DDs can detect you even you are full stop the motor and submerdged.if you are @ periscope depth they will directly fire @ you by thier guns. I think that's because tall antenna you added on the conning tower.
I recently also make a small MOD to detailed the Jumping wire of 7c3 conning tower (just detailed the jumping wire nothing else get touched)and also find the similar problem but a little better than that of yours, that the DD will not directly fire @ u by their guns when you are @ periscope depth. But still seems the DD can easly detect you(the noise meter keeps red all the time even you dive below 260 meter and keep @ 2 knots):damn: .
I do the same test for the stock 7C3 conning tower. Just after the game begins the noise meter keeps in red in about 10+ seconds after the closest DD pass you by the noise meter turn back to green.

Do not know why????? need some MOD aces like privateer or someone else to help on this.:rock:

[Myxale]

This is a bit tricky!

Since GWX updated the game in every aspect its generally more difficult!

Even if you play the U505 Single-Mission with the standard Boot (a IXC i think) you are detected instantly! It's late war and the DD's are elite!

So it might be the antenas!
Have you tested it with a differnt mission! :hmm:

[Wolfehunter]

This is a bit tricky!

Since GWX updated the game in every aspect its generally more difficult!

Even if you play the U505 Single-Mission with the standard Boot (a IXC i think) you are detected instantly! It's late war and the DD's are elite!

So it might be the antenas!
Have you tested it with a differnt mission! :hmm:I belive its the antennas i go to 14 m to use my periscope. His first VIIC/41 model has the same problem.

[schnorchel]

Hi All,
As what I have stated, I divided this test into 3 cells - Tomi's 7c3, My 7C3 and stock 7C3. test each cell 3 times. same result as I mentioned on each time. Only the stock 7C3 can successfully hide @ periscope depth in silent run mode without being detected by the DDs. Do not test IXC yet. It seems that even the small touch to the 3d data file can affect the the detectable charactor.

[Uber Gruber]

Any update on this WIP ? I took it for a test drive and loved the 3-D drain holes, though feel the water is too "white" when inside them. Also, will this be compatible with Rubini's drain hole water effect ?

Cheers...

[Tomi_099]

Yes/No/Yes/N0 - It is no April a joke

hope and my purpose(destination) for this month:


the final version VIIC41 of DD and the beta version VII D with the new Hull

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fantastically lasts if to you Rubini would help(assist)!!!:rock:

:sunny: ( Also, will this be compatible with Rubini's drain hole water effect ? ):sunny:

Great !!! Great !!! Great !!! Great !!! Great !!! Great !!! Great !!!:up:

[Mast]

Hi Tomi,

Did you fix the schnorchel length?

Mast

[Madox58]

Hi All,
As what I have stated, I divided this test into 3 cells - Tomi's 7c3, My 7C3 and stock 7C3. test each cell 3 times. same result as I mentioned on each time. Only the stock 7C3 can successfully hide @ periscope depth in silent run mode without being detected by the DDs. Do not test IXC yet. It seems that even the small touch to the 3d data file can affect the the detectable charactor.


:lol:
Have you figured out why this is yet?
;)

[Tomi_099]

Hi All,
As what I have stated, I divided this test into 3 cells - Tomi's 7c3, My 7C3 and stock 7C3. test each cell 3 times. same result as I mentioned on each time. Only the stock 7C3 can successfully hide @ periscope depth in silent run mode without being detected by the DDs. Do not test IXC yet. It seems that even the small touch to the 3d data file can affect the the detectable charactor.


:lol:
Have you figured out why this is yet?
;)
-------------------------------------------------------

Only the stock 7C3 can successfully hide @:yep:
:roll: I dont no !!!
I have shortened the aerial( antene ) , I believe this is another problem!!!:ping:

[schnorchel]

Hi Kaleuns,

Here I must do an apologize for what I declared previously.:oops: I redo the test for each of 2 type mods of 7c3 and stock 7c3 5 times in last week and found that all type has possibility to be detected by the DD @ the periscope depth and if Tomi's 7c3 is set to14m the DD will not fire their gun.

:dead: :dead: :dead: But now I experience another problem on Tomi's 7c3. I can not start a fresh new campaign from 1943 with this beauty. each time after came into loading process it gets CTD (no other Mod is implemented, just over clear GWX2.0). Found that no problem with1944 campaign.

[Madox58]

If you increase any model part.
Say an antenna is a bit higher then stock.
You increase the Bounding Box the Game "Sees".
All may appear correct to our eyes but!
Not to the Game Engine.
We see things differently.
;)

[magicsub]

Unless you can deploy mines from them tubes the boat is kinda stipid....What is the reason for this post? Comments like this are what gives these foreigners the impression that we are barbaric idiots! :damn:

keep your hands at the level of your eyes

[Tomi_099]

Hi Kaleuns,

Here I must do an apologize for what I declared previously.:oops: I redo the test for each of 2 type mods of 7c3 and stock 7c3 5 times in last week and found that all type has possibility to be detected by the DD @ the periscope depth and if Tomi's 7c3 is set to14m the DD will not fire their gun.

:dead: :dead: :dead: But now I experience another problem on Tomi's 7c3. I can not start a fresh new campaign from 1943 with this beauty. each time after came into loading process it gets CTD (no other Mod is implemented, just over clear GWX2.0). Found that no problem with1944 campaign.
---------------------------------------------------
But now I experience another problem on Tomi's 7c3. I can not start a fresh new campaign from 1943 with this beauty. each time after came into loading process it gets CTD (no other Mod is implemented, just over clear GWX2.0). Found that no problem
with1944 campaign.
.................................................. .........
Can you Tell me ?? - yor PC Performens !!! - :hmm:

...... campaign from 1943 :hmm: ~ ( campaign from 1944/1945 ) i think o.k

[Tomi_099]

So, Privateer !!!
I have thought!!!

- Bounding box –
-
- Logically a point reaches beyond the area which is not visible,
so if to itself a point in the Game, however,
is beyond the Objekt to be located by a destroyer.

Even if the Bounding box there is bigger than the model, becomes the edge of the Bounding box as a model recognised:hmm:


Is it what you would like to say to me??:hmm:

PS:
This seems to me logical and absolutely possible, this lasts more fatal - "error" - many have done, because one the Bounding box as only one green edge is to be recognised.
And because the Bounding box greater than modell is - yas!!! - this could be possible .-

[schnorchel]

Hi Kaleuns,

Here I must do an apologize for what I declared previously.:oops: I redo the test for each of 2 type mods of 7c3 and stock 7c3 5 times in last week and found that all type has possibility to be detected by the DD @ the periscope depth and if Tomi's 7c3 is set to14m the DD will not fire their gun.

:dead: :dead: :dead: But now I experience another problem on Tomi's 7c3. I can not start a fresh new campaign from 1943 with this beauty. each time after came into loading process it gets CTD (no other Mod is implemented, just over clear GWX2.0). Found that no problem with1944 campaign.
---------------------------------------------------
But now I experience another problem on Tomi's 7c3. I can not start a fresh new campaign from 1943 with this beauty. each time after came into loading process it gets CTD (no other Mod is implemented, just over clear GWX2.0). Found that no problem
with1944 campaign.
.................................................. .........
Can you Tell me ?? - yor PC Performens !!! - :hmm:

...... campaign from 1943 :hmm: ~ ( campaign from 1944/1945 ) i think o.k


Hi Tomi,

Don't know what you mean about the PC performence.:) Sorry for my bad english:smug: . Could any good english speaker can help to get it more clear? But your last sentence is comfirmed:...... campaign from 1943 get Crash to desktop ~ ( campaign from 1944/1945 ) is o.k

[Wolfehunter]

Hi Kaleuns,

Here I must do an apologize for what I declared previously.:oops: I redo the test for each of 2 type mods of 7c3 and stock 7c3 5 times in last week and found that all type has possibility to be detected by the DD @ the periscope depth and if Tomi's 7c3 is set to14m the DD will not fire their gun.

:dead: :dead: :dead: But now I experience another problem on Tomi's 7c3. I can not start a fresh new campaign from 1943 with this beauty. each time after came into loading process it gets CTD (no other Mod is implemented, just over clear GWX2.0). Found that no problem with1944 campaign.
---------------------------------------------------
But now I experience another problem on Tomi's 7c3. I can not start a fresh new campaign from 1943 with this beauty. each time after came into loading process it gets CTD (no other Mod is implemented, just over clear GWX2.0). Found that no problem
with1944 campaign.
.................................................. .........
Can you Tell me ?? - yor PC Performens !!! - :hmm:

...... campaign from 1943 :hmm: ~ ( campaign from 1944/1945 ) i think o.k


Hi Tomi,

Don't know what you mean about the PC performence.:) Sorry for my bad english:smug: . Could any good english speaker can help to get it more clear? But your last sentence is comfirmed:...... campaign from 1943 get Crash to desktop ~ ( campaign from 1944/1945 ) is o.kHe wants to know what are your PC specs. Can you show the CTD error message also?:yep:

[schnorchel]

Hi Kaleuns,

Here I must do an apologize for what I declared previously.:oops: I redo the test for each of 2 type mods of 7c3 and stock 7c3 5 times in last week and found that all type has possibility to be detected by the DD @ the periscope depth and if Tomi's 7c3 is set to14m the DD will not fire their gun.

:dead: :dead: :dead: But now I experience another problem on Tomi's 7c3. I can not start a fresh new campaign from 1943 with this beauty. each time after came into loading process it gets CTD (no other Mod is implemented, just over clear GWX2.0). Found that no problem with1944 campaign.
---------------------------------------------------
But now I experience another problem on Tomi's 7c3. I can not start a fresh new campaign from 1943 with this beauty. each time after came into loading process it gets CTD (no other Mod is implemented, just over clear GWX2.0). Found that no problem
with1944 campaign.
.................................................. .........
Can you Tell me ?? - yor PC Performens !!! - :hmm:

...... campaign from 1943 :hmm: ~ ( campaign from 1944/1945 ) i think o.k


Hi Tomi,

Don't know what you mean about the PC performence.:) Sorry for my bad english:smug: . Could any good english speaker can help to get it more clear? But your last sentence is comfirmed:...... campaign from 1943 get Crash to desktop ~ ( campaign from 1944/1945 ) is o.kHe wants to know what are your PC specs. Can you show the CTD error message also?:yep:



Thanks for Wolfehunter's explaination!
Tomi,
Regarding the PC spec, Do you mean i.e. core2-6700, 4G Ram something like that?
Regarding CTD error message, No error message shown after CTD. Or the SH3 has a funtion that can create an error txt file somewhere? I dont know.

[Tomi_099]

Hi Kaleuns,

Here I must do an apologize for what I declared previously.:oops: I redo the test for each of 2 type mods of 7c3 and stock 7c3 5 times in last week and found that all type has possibility to be detected by the DD @ the periscope depth and if Tomi's 7c3 is set to14m the DD will not fire their gun.

:dead: :dead: :dead: But now I experience another problem on Tomi's 7c3. I can not start a fresh new campaign from 1943 with this beauty. each time after came into loading process it gets CTD (no other Mod is implemented, just over clear GWX2.0). Found that no problem with1944 campaign.
---------------------------------------------------
But now I experience another problem on Tomi's 7c3. I can not start a fresh new campaign from 1943 with this beauty. each time after came into loading process it gets CTD (no other Mod is implemented, just over clear GWX2.0). Found that no problem
with1944 campaign.
.................................................. .........
Can you Tell me ?? - yor PC Performens !!! - :hmm:

...... campaign from 1943 :hmm: ~ ( campaign from 1944/1945 ) i think o.k


Hi Tomi,

Don't know what you mean about the PC performence.:) Sorry for my bad english:smug: . Could any good english speaker can help to get it more clear? But your last sentence is comfirmed:...... campaign from 1943 get Crash to desktop ~ ( campaign from 1944/1945 ) is o.kHe wants to know what are your PC specs. Can you show the CTD error message also?:yep:



Thanks for Wolfehunter's explaination!
Tomi,
Regarding the PC spec, Do you mean i.e. core2-6700, 4G Ram something like that?
Regarding CTD error message, No error message shown after CTD. Or the SH3 has a funtion that can create an error txt file somewhere? I dont know.

------------------

core2-6700, 4G Ram
that’s my performers to !!!
I think that is no problem!!

The problem is in the config from the Sub.
VIIc /41 – ( Coning Tower 3 ) activity in the equcment ( datum )
Look this an changed them.:ping:

[schnorchel]

Hi Kaleuns,

Here I must do an apologize for what I declared previously.:oops: I redo the test for each of 2 type mods of 7c3 and stock 7c3 5 times in last week and found that all type has possibility to be detected by the DD @ the periscope depth and if Tomi's 7c3 is set to14m the DD will not fire their gun.

:dead: :dead: :dead: But now I experience another problem on Tomi's 7c3. I can not start a fresh new campaign from 1943 with this beauty. each time after came into loading process it gets CTD (no other Mod is implemented, just over clear GWX2.0). Found that no problem with1944 campaign.
---------------------------------------------------
But now I experience another problem on Tomi's 7c3. I can not start a fresh new campaign from 1943 with this beauty. each time after came into loading process it gets CTD (no other Mod is implemented, just over clear GWX2.0). Found that no problem
with1944 campaign.
.................................................. .........
Can you Tell me ?? - yor PC Performens !!! - :hmm:

...... campaign from 1943 :hmm: ~ ( campaign from 1944/1945 ) i think o.k


Hi Tomi,

Don't know what you mean about the PC performence.:) Sorry for my bad english:smug: . Could any good english speaker can help to get it more clear? But your last sentence is comfirmed:...... campaign from 1943 get Crash to desktop ~ ( campaign from 1944/1945 ) is o.kHe wants to know what are your PC specs. Can you show the CTD error message also?:yep:



Thanks for Wolfehunter's explaination!
Tomi,
Regarding the PC spec, Do you mean i.e. core2-6700, 4G Ram something like that?
Regarding CTD error message, No error message shown after CTD. Or the SH3 has a funtion that can create an error txt file somewhere? I dont know.

------------------

core2-6700, 4G Ram
that’s my performers to !!!
I think that is no problem!!

The problem is in the config from the Sub.
VIIc /41 – ( Coning Tower 3 ) activity in the equcment ( datum )
Look this an changed them.:ping:


So Tomi, Does that mean that you experience the same problem on you own computer?

[schnorchel]

Can not find the turm7c3 in NSS_Uboat7c41.eqp
But can find it in NSS_Uboat7c.eqp.
Do you mean the line"StartDate" in the section below in this file?

third coning with 3 AA mounts, 2 twin 20mm, 1 single 37mm
[Equipment 3]
NodeName=Z01
LinkName=data/objects/Turm7c_3_hd
StartDate=19440101
EndDate=19451231

I think the date here is same to that in stock version.
Have changed it to StartDate=19430101 and try to load get same result - CTD

[Tomi_099]

Hi Kaleuns,

Here I must do an apologize for what I declared previously.:oops: I redo the test for each of 2 type mods of 7c3 and stock 7c3 5 times in last week and found that all type has possibility to be detected by the DD @ the periscope depth and if Tomi's 7c3 is set to14m the DD will not fire their gun.

:dead: :dead: :dead: But now I experience another problem on Tomi's 7c3. I can not start a fresh new campaign from 1943 with this beauty. each time after came into loading process it gets CTD (no other Mod is implemented, just over clear GWX2.0). Found that no problem with1944 campaign.
---------------------------------------------------
But now I experience another problem on Tomi's 7c3. I can not start a fresh new campaign from 1943 with this beauty. each time after came into loading process it gets CTD (no other Mod is implemented, just over clear GWX2.0). Found that no problem
with1944 campaign.
.................................................. .........
Can you Tell me ?? - yor PC Performens !!! - :hmm:

...... campaign from 1943 :hmm: ~ ( campaign from 1944/1945 ) i think o.k


Hi Tomi,

Don't know what you mean about the PC performence.:) Sorry for my bad english:smug: . Could any good english speaker can help to get it more clear? But your last sentence is comfirmed:...... campaign from 1943 get Crash to desktop ~ ( campaign from 1944/1945 ) is o.kHe wants to know what are your PC specs. Can you show the CTD error message also?:yep:



Thanks for Wolfehunter's explaination!
Tomi,
Regarding the PC spec, Do you mean i.e. core2-6700, 4G Ram something like that?
Regarding CTD error message, No error message shown after CTD. Or the SH3 has a funtion that can create an error txt file somewhere? I dont know.

------------------

core2-6700, 4G Ram
that’s my performers to !!!
I think that is no problem!!

The problem is in the config from the Sub.
VIIc /41 – ( Coning Tower 3 ) activity in the equcment ( datum )
Look this an changed them.:ping:


So Tomi, Does that mean that you experience the same problem on you own computer?
-----

If it this only grind is lasts e long to the program beginning,
and sometimes gives e a black screen. and then Programm-cresh .
So thets only by the first Time or first Start.
Given the PC a little Time.

. If a Campagne Beginning it is not because of the Equcment Config.
. Because most Campagnes in 1939 starting, the VIIc / 41 there was not at this time, therefore the boat is mostly in 1945 to plays. The best one prove is the single mission, how said this

However, this lies with the Equcment file the Turm3 only from a certain date responds.
Man can change the Equcment By hand with text editor then one is able to do (date), boot also to 1939 plays.
Unfortunately, I am able to do it at the moment not figuratively pointing because I am not at home .
When you Started Champagne at 1939 the Programme - Load Turm1 ( I Rework Turm3) First from GWX2.0 Folder to my Hull.

[schnorchel]

The way I try to play your 7c3 in 1943 is to start a campaign and then go to shipyard to upgrade the conning tower. then start the mission then CTD.:cry:

[Tomi_099]

The way I try to play your 7c3 in 1943 is to start a campaign and then go to shipyard to upgrade the conning tower. then start the mission then CTD.:cry:
--------------------------------------------
Can not find the turm7c3 in NSS_Uboat7c41.eqp
But can find it in NSS_Uboat7c.eqp.
Do you mean the line"StartDate" in the section below in this file?

third coning with 3 AA mounts, 2 twin 20mm, 1 single 37mm
[Equipment 3]
NodeName=Z01
LinkName=data/objects/Turm7c_3_hd
StartDate=19440101
EndDate=19451231

I think the date here is same to that in stock version.
Have changed it to StartDate=19430101 and try to load get same result - CTD

After thet changed you mast start NEW Campagne !!.
...
Who can HELP ???

[schnorchel]

Hi Tomi,

After changed I do restart a new campaign, But same result CTD:damn:

[Tomi_099]

Here at the moment we are!!

http://207.44.214.111/subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=116988&page=7

[Tomi_099]

http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/6711/5akopieaz4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Rubini]

Hi Tomi,

I should like to start to work on your type VIId.
My main work is on the .dat file.
Do you already finished it?
The more important is that you, if possible, not more change the drain holes places. The water stream mod will be individualy adjusted for each drain hole.

Anyway I can make the work on your last .dat and then resend it to you. You then must use this new .dat to continue your work. This way your VIId will since now have the water stream.

Contact me ASAP with you can. I´m working today on new uboats.:up:

Cheers,

Rubini.

(I just sent the same by PM so reply me where you prefer, here or PM)

[schnorchel]

Rubini,

Why not 7C41?:D

[Rubini]

Rubini,

Why not 7C41?:D

Excuse me, was a confuse of mine!:D
Yes, it will be on the Type VIIC/41!;)

[Rubini]

Hey Tomi! Take a look. Its´done!

http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/4384/tomiviic41ans2.jpg


http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/6283/tomiviic41bkd2.jpg

[Myxale]

:rock:Yeah way to rock Rubini!

Say, where to get that one!

[Rubini]

:rock:Yeah way to rock Rubini!

Say, where to get that one!
Probably today at night on the Water Stream thread.:yep:

[LordNeuro"Serbia"]

Those shore looks wery good. Wery wery good. Two master pices merged tugeter. Thise is the exemple too folow.
Keep up the great work:up:

[Wolfehunter]

Dambit thats awesome.:rock:

[Uber Gruber]

:huh: VIIC........PLEASE!!!!!:up:

[Tomi_099]

[QUOTE=Rubini]Hey Tomi! Take a look. Its´done!

Wow!!!!
Incredibly - Crazily - I am from the socks!!! - Splendidly RUBINI!!!!
:doh:

RUBINI!!!!RUBINI!!!!RUBINI!!!!RUBINI!!!!RUBINI!!!! RUBINI!!!!RUBINI!!!!RUBINI!!!!RUBINI!!!!

[Tomi_099]

Hey Tomi! Take a look. Its´done!

http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/4384/tomiviic41ans2.jpg


http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/6283/tomiviic41bkd2.jpg


Wow!!!!
Incredibly - Crazily - I am from the socks!!! - Splendidly RUBINI!!!!
:doh:

RUBINI!!!!RUBINI!!!!RUBINI!!!!RUBINI!!!!RUBINI!!!! RUBINI!!!!RUBINI!!!!RUBINI!!!!RUBINI!!!!

http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/5599/oskar1rt7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
---------------- http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/images/smilies/thank_you2.gif ------------------

[Gairith]

:huh: VIIC........PLEASE!!!!!:up:

V3 does VIIB & C Looks awesome too.
http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=133541

[Rubini]

Thanks by the Oscar Tomi!:D

Your VIIc is awesome Tomi! The details are a must for any uboat fan!
You will see that in your model the actual water stream pattern is a bit to few, just beacuse we can see all that holes in 3D and then we feel that more holes need to have water. I will work on this soon!:up:

As dentier pointed to us I will make, AFTER finish all the uboats, a more special nose effects for Type VII/II as we can see on the video that he found. Specially for the emerging times.:yep:

But even with only the same pattern from the others "stock" VIIC your VIIC/41 is really yet more alive now! You will see!;)

[Uber Gruber]

I think this is the best mod combination since....well since bread came sliced.

:rock:

[schnorchel]

Great work! Rubini.:up:


Who can help to fix the problem of starting a 1943 campaign with Tomi's VIIc/41?:rock:

[Tomi_099]

Great work! Rubini.:up:


Who can help to fix the problem of starting a 1943 campaign with Tomi's VIIc/41?:rock:
.................................................. .


http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/images/smilies/help.gif ..-..--.Sir. Mr. Trainer1942..-.SOS..--..HELP...-.. ( Nautilus_42 )...SOS... http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/images/smilies/help.gif

[SpeedyPC]

G'day Tomi_099,

May I ask why is your homepage website is down? so I could download the Mod Sub VIIC, VIIC/41, VIIC/42 and I think VIID.

Because I've delete all your u-boats mod submarie by mistake from my HD, and I would like to get the latest mod file please from your homepage site http://ztomi.homeip.net/ cause the link is dead.:damn: :ping:

Ta.

[Wolfehunter]

G'day Tomi_099,

May I ask why is your homepage website is down? so I could download the Mod Sub VIIC, VIIC/41, VIIC/42 and I think VIID.

Because I've delete all your u-boats mod submarie by mistake from my HD, and I would like to get the latest mod file please from your homepage site http://ztomi.homeip.net/ cause the link is dead.:damn: :ping:

Ta.Check my filefront link under tomi's work. you'll find all his subs there.:up:

[Rubini]

New water stream mod Version 4 released now with Tomi's VIIC/41:up:

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=814298#post814298

[Tomi_099]

New water stream mod Version 4 released now with Tomi's VIIC/41:up:

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=814298#post814298

--------------------------------------------------------------
.................... GREAT RUBINI !!!! THANKS !!!...................
----------------http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/images/smilies/clapping.gif http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/images/smilies/thank_you2.gif http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/images/smilies/clapping.gif------------------

[Rubini]

Thanks again Tomi, but the oscar is for you!

Anyhow, I forgotten to say that I made two versions, one normal and another with more contrast between the water streams and the VIIC/41 hull color. The normal, is the dafault. The more contrast one needs juts to be renamed correctly (both on 7c folder).

Let me know if you find any problem or any comment/suggestion.:up:

[SpeedyPC]

Thank you :up: :rock:

[Tomi_099]

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/6527/1aah7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/8550/89007784si9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/4716/2aha7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/209/39664311ay2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/5362/39498448fo7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/5362/39498448fo7.8d4a7c36c5.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=529&i=39498448fo7.jpg)


http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/2327/9azd0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/2327/9azd0.55adc3c6d3.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=529&i=9azd0.jpg)


http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/5128/11db2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/5128/11db2.4e1253b7b6.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=529&i=11db2.jpg)

http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/415/12hm3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/903/14uf4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Tomi_099]

http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/3342/16qc3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/5537/17rg5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/206/24lv1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/924/86654816rz7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)






http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/938/25kd8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/8628/21kx1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)




http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/7320/18of6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Graf Paper]

VERY NICE! :D

Now, stop teasing us, Tomi! :p

Still waiting patiently for a finished release. :stare:

[Rubini]

Tomi,

In these pics you probably have something wrong with the water stream mod. They aren´t pixelized as in these pics. They are in truth very smooth and have a real feeling of water draining from the holes...you probably have something incompatible with water stream mod on your installation.:hmm: :hmm:

What mods are you using?


http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/6527/1aah7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)












http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/5362/39498448fo7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/5362/39498448fo7.8d4a7c36c5.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=529&i=39498448fo7.jpg)


http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/2327/9azd0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/2327/9azd0.55adc3c6d3.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=529&i=9azd0.jpg)



http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/5128/11db2.4e1253b7b6.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=529&i=11db2.jpg)

http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/415/12hm3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Graf Paper]

Maybe he's running the mod in SH4?

I know he likes posting screenshots from there to really show off his new model with some snazzy, high-res textures.

[Wolfehunter]

No he's running SH3 with GWX 2.0 problem is his Graphic settings.:hmm:

[Tomi_099]

:oops: No he's running SH3 with GWX 2.0 problem is his Graphic settings.:hmm:
----------------------------------------------------

No he's running SH3 with GWX 2.0 problem is his Graphic settings
--:hmm: -------------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe!!
I have done the pictures with PrintKey and only a little the Gama regulator shifted any more I have not done.
Maybe the Grafic Setings are different like Wulfehater says,
however, this is not aware to me.
I have a GForce 8800 Ultra.

Yes and a new Skin is in the boat. This is everything!!!

[Uber Gruber]

Hey Tomi....any chance you could change Rubini's well deserved oscar to read "medal of honour" rather than "medal of horner" ? He may well be, err, a bit of the latter but still.....:yep:

[Rubini]

Someone another day said something about little squares on the water stream when using new OLCE mod together. I don't know if this is "true" or not. Are you using OLCE Tomi? Anyone more have problems with OLCE and water stream together?:hmm:

@Uber Gruber: yes, "Honour" is better but the important was Tomi's good intention.:D
Anyhow, like i said, he himself deserves the oscar by his great 3D work on these uboats.

[Tomi_099]

Someone another day said something about little squares on the water stream when using new OLCE mod together. I don't know if this is "true" or not. Are you using OLCE Tomi? Anyone more have problems with OLCE and water stream together?:hmm:

@Uber Gruber: yes, "Honour" is better but the important was Tomi's good intention.:D
Anyhow, like i said, he himself deserves the oscar by his great 3D work on these uboats.
------------------------------------------------------------

Ares you using OLCE Tomi? … … … … … … … … … … … … ….

I have nothing of the same ones maybe is a setting of Shedern or AntiAlesing, I become it testing and try out.

Well, for me you are this month the hero, but I will change you to dear ones it with the opportunity.

Now I have thought to me I would want a mustiness honour from every month now.
I find good moder have earned to be honoured.

Now there I am no committee, it is more a personal thing, what is also the Oskar. Thereby I hopefully wake in every modes a stimulus.
I do not hope this is too taken seriously, because all modes are good. :sunny:
As said personal favourites.:hmm:

[Tomi_099]

http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/3286/11ahu4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/3286/11ahu4.b548b20d7a.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=501&i=11ahu4.jpg)


http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/5972/85363866gl2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/7905/42710690cn6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/7905/42710690cn6.e86917fd75.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=501&i=42710690cn6.jpg)


http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/1341/51542647iw6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/1341/51542647iw6.962c62ef4b.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=501&i=51542647iw6.jpg)




http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/1674/48844422lz5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/1674/48844422lz5.5f9d108fa0.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=501&i=48844422lz5.jpg)


http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/234/10ne9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/439/23bn3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/6771/20ol6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Rubini]

Now they are ok man!:D

I don´t know if you noticed that I have made also a version with more water draining contrast for your type VIIc/41? Try it if you yet don´t did it.;)

http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/3286/11ahu4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/3286/11ahu4.b548b20d7a.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=501&i=11ahu4.jpg)


http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/5972/85363866gl2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/7905/42710690cn6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/7905/42710690cn6.e86917fd75.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=501&i=42710690cn6.jpg)

[Tomi_099]

http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/9933/1ccvl8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)




http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/5728/18ms7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[rascal101]

Are these subs ready for download and are they intended for SH3 or 4

[Tomi_099]

[QUOTE=Rubini]Now they are ok man!:D

I don´t know if you noticed that I have made also a version with more water draining contrast for your type VIIc/41? Try it if you yet don´t did it.;)

......................................
Thank you RUBINI!!

Either I do not have actuellen version or part in the JSMG is not right!!
I heard you have also done an Exhaustmod, but I cannot see him.

Or if I have wandered.!!:hmm:

Thets MY OPTION !!
http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/8876/cccu7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Tomi_099]

G'day Tomi_099,

May I ask why is your homepage website is down? so I could download the Mod Sub VIIC, VIIC/41, VIIC/42 and I think VIID.

Because I've delete all your u-boats mod submarie by mistake from my HD, and I would like to get the latest mod file please from your homepage site http://ztomi.homeip.net/ cause the link is dead.:damn: :ping:

Ta.
----------------------------------------------------
SORRY !! :oops:

MY SERVER IS DEFECT bat in MOMENT HE IS GOING !!
THE PROBLEM IS, I DONT NO HOW LONG !!:dead:


http://ztomi.homeip.net/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
....................................... SILENT HUNTER III .......................................

File: GWX-_VIIC41_Player_Sub_V17.rar
DownloadLink: http://rapidshare.com/files/101379300/GWX-_VIIC41_Player_Sub_V17.rar

File-Size: 21,54 MB
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Tomi_099]

Are these subs ready for download and are they intended for SH3 or 4
.................................................. .............

Sorry !!

The Sub is Redy with anather Skin

I mast little Korrekt the - NEW- Skin - i think tomorrow -

-------------------------------------------------

[Tomi_099]

- TREFFEN VIIc/41 -

http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/7838/38329815rc4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/690/79279675cy2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/5867/68841338pq5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/7656/79128497yc8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/6216/29909023ky3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/5077/32629491ck5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/8240/15386557hq4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/6682/11pb8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/1591/12ck3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/6444/14cb5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/4793/16wu3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/2639/13vg9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Wolfehunter]

Tomi If you want to see RB's exhaust over Rubini's water steam + Wake fix you need to add Philipp Thomsen's tweak over it. :up:

http://files.filefront.com/RBs+ES+for+Rubinis+WSrar/;9950018;/fileinfo.html

I made one but PT beat me to it.:damn:

Its in Rubini's readme how to tweak RB's val files to make it compatible. But If your Files are different than RB's then you will have a problem with your mod and RB's exhaust.:hmm:

[Tomi_099]

Tomi If you want to see RB's exhaust over Rubini's water steam + Wake fix you need to add Philipp Thomsen's tweak over it. :up:

http://files.filefront.com/RBs+ES+for+Rubinis+WSrar/;9950018;/fileinfo.html

I made one but PT beat me to it.:damn:

Its in Rubini's readme how to tweak RB's val files to make it compatible. But If your Files are different than RB's then you will have a problem with your mod and RB's exhaust.:hmm:
-------------------------------------------------
Thanks !!

Bat i haven no weke and olso smoke by my Sub :huh: nathing , bat is it GWX2.0:hmm:

[Wolfehunter]

RB val files will work with GWX 2.0 but will it work with yours?:hmm:

[Pascal]

Your 3D model has needed a lot of work; it's an evidence. And it could be nice to use,
But, the long water hole in the middle of the hull is too much small (in his Height). It looks like a string.
About open holes, those in the low hull position are nice to see and give something real, and this is a +
But, for other holes i will prefere to see it close and black, with just the "illusion mod" made by Rubini.
It's always a curious thing to see this clear blue water go inside the sub, and for me it's a non-sens.
With these little modifications, your 3D model will be a top
Dont forget also the simple VIIC model.

Then, after, forgot a little sub and attack 3D crew models, or then guns model, or still the interior. There are here many little things to do for a good 3D modder.




http://pagesperso-orange.fr/Ermitage-France/u995.jpg

[Tomi_099]

[QUOTE=Pascal]Your 3D model has needed a lot of work; it's an evidence. And it could be nice to use,
But, the long water hole in the middle of the hull is too much small (in his Height). It looks like a string.
About open holes, those in the low hull position are nice to see and give something real, and this is a +
But, for other holes i will prefere to see it close and black, with just the "illusion mod" made by Rubini.
It's always a curious thing to see this clear blue water go inside the sub, and for me it's a non-sens.
With these little modifications, your 3D model will be a top
Dont forget also the simple VIIC model.

Then, after, forgot a little sub and attack 3D crew models, or then guns model, or still the interior. There are here many little things to do for a good 3D modder.

.........................................
Yes! you could be right with the holes !!http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/images/smilies/scare.gif

A wonderful photo, I do not have this yet!!
The problem is so many data are edited on a tolerable minimum.

DivingDuckhttp://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/images/smilies/ok.gif and I are in the high-resolution variation, the problem,
I come not to send in addition in the data,

but I promise the week leads the way with the high-resolution variation.
I think XXIII such a small SUbBoot, according to a problem become.
But I will improve it.http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/images/smilies/good.gif
:hmm:

[Tomi_099]

--- AND ---

http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/5073/32303996yn2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


---- NOW ----
[URL=http://imageshack.us]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/9514/43095751aa7.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=527&i=32303996yn2.jpg)
http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/9514/43095751aa7.fa0f8f0c39.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=525&i=43095751aa7.jpg)

---- EXHAUST -----
http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/5242/51958060xp0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/5242/51958060xp0.fca897fa3c.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=527&i=51958060xp0.jpg)


----- SMOKE -----
http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/2410/41309939um9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/2410/41309939um9.7371040178.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=527&i=41309939um9.jpg)


----- MOD ----
http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/5331/80899354wp6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/5331/80899354wp6.9aa9d161bb.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=527&i=80899354wp6.jpg)



----- FOR -----
http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/7681/6chq7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


..... VIIc / 41 ...GWX 2.0 .....:ping:

http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/4453/18541100fh0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Wolfehunter]

Outstanding work tomi...:up:

[Philipp_Thomsen]

Are you planning on modelling the other subs, Tomi?

It would be a dream to have high polygon in all uboats... :o

[Tomi_099]

Are you planning on modelling the other subs, Tomi?

It would be a dream to have high polygon in all uboats... :o
........................

Moin !!
Thomsen

That is also my dream, only alone advertising I it in these lives not the work. Except it helps. At the fastest one it to go if e.g. I build the models .
and another integrated it into the Game.
As it were one time, and everyone make which it best can.

I must praise you your sound mod I installed myself.

I can recommend only to everyone.
Well made.!!!!

[Pascal]

I see by chance these pictures (u995) Much detail interesting

http://solomaquetas.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=11892

[Tomi_099]

I see by chance these pictures (u995) Much detail interesting

http://solomaquetas.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=11892

............Thanks !!!! Very Very !!! Interesting !!!:up:

[Wolfehunter]

Pascal Awesome pics dude. That gave me an idea for a new VIIC deck. Thanks:up:

[Jimbuna]

Yep, some fantastic shots there Pascal http://www.psionguild.org/forums/images/smilies/wolfsmilies/thumbsup.gif

[Pascal]

last one i discover about VIIC/41; certainly you already know.
Always little things interesting for a careful modder.

http://www.uboatarchive.net/U-249PhotosLondonderry.htm

[Tomi_099]

:ping:




http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/6786/17545265rg3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/4697/5aba8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)




http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/4864/44247477rw4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/4484/10978644vx3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/4582/10zh7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/2867/11ml3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/1262/13avs8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/479/14mv9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/6880/15ch3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/6259/17tq9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)





http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/9477/18xc8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Philipp_Thomsen]

Are you planning on modelling the other subs, Tomi?

It would be a dream to have high polygon in all uboats... :o
........................

Moin !!
Thomsen

That is also my dream, only alone advertising I it in these lives not the work. Except it helps. At the fastest one it to go if e.g. I build the models .
and another integrated it into the Game.
As it were one time, and everyone make which it best can.

I must praise you your sound mod I installed myself.

I can recommend only to everyone.
Well made.!!!!


Thank you very much, Tomi! At the moment in working in the next version of the sound mod, lot of new features!

I'm really praying that you work on all the uboats.

If every uboat in the game look so beautiful as your VIIC/41, I WILL BE IN HEAVEN! :rock:

Im REALLY REALLY REALLY hoping you can do that. I know it takes a lot of time to do it, but if is there one person who can do it, ITS YOU TOMI! :up:

[Tomi_099]

[quote=Tomi_099][quote=Philipp_Thomsen]Are you planning on modelling the other subs, Tomi?

It would be a dream to have high polygon in all uboats... :o
........................


Thanks Thomsen I do my best for you !!!:up:

[Myxale]

Tomi, is your Boot ok with GWX 2.1:hmm:

[Tomi_099]

Pascal Awesome pics dude. That gave me an idea for a new VIIC deck. Thanks:up:
---------------------------

I didn't hear nothing so I'm wondering if you see what I saw that might be texture bugs?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry Wolfehunter i was very byssi in Moment.
So this problem of texturing.
Now the best way is I build a new hull.:hmm:
At soon as possibly I do that.
Bat before I will finish it Sam little works.

Thanks for your information.
See you soon .!!!:rock:

[Tomi_099]

Tomi, is your Boot ok with GWX 2.1:hmm:


Now no I did not have to test the possibilities it.

I would like to wait gladly still another little,
around the reaction of the Forum to hear on Patsch GWX 2.1

But that is and the reference will be either way.
I hope only the Capt.Lehmenn not too much on then submarines made.:hmm:
:arrgh!:

[Uber Gruber]

I'm a bit confused....nothing new there...anyway, i'm looking for Tomi's VIIc (not VIIc/41) with Rubini's water stream and RB's Exhaust Smoke mod....all compatible with GWX 2.1 and OLCs Ubermod......can anyone help ? What would I need to do to achieve this ?

Many thanks for any help in advance...

[Tomi_099]

I'm a bit confused....nothing new there...anyway, i'm looking for Tomi's VIIc (not VIIc/41) with Rubini's water stream and RB's Exhaust Smoke mod....all compatible with GWX 2.1 and OLCs Ubermod......can anyone help ? What would I need to do to achieve this ?

Many thanks for any help in advance...
----------------------------------------

To hello please do not despair I still my weekend sacrificed here. !!
But it is not enough I the textures still will probably change around somewhat thicker water jet to get.
I have for instance the double make a deposit chunks (water jet) added.

Rubini made an exemplary work, for work my needs is somewhat different.
Me is also not admits that it enhaustmod (smokemod) for the VIIc/41 made .

Still another little patience, and the flag was put on by me.
Now I try to insert the same of the XXIII.
I can calibrate to only say that a giant work am the Rubini was carried out.

A great thanks for which it made.:up:

[Uber Gruber]

Sorry Tomi but I didn't understand everything you said. Are you saying that VIIc for GWX 2.1 has not YET been released ?


Thanks.....

[Tomi_099]

I test it to tomorrow !!!:up:

[Tomi_099]

Now I have the work today taken up around DivingDuck platform too give around to get ahead the HighRes model to ensure.

http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/3241/55216070we0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/3807/48018282iz5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/106/38375826kr3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)




http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/2786/89828058ne4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/6262/97480558ow5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/3976/11274582lh6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/2902/69063985iq5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/9742/61624955wa4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/3917/23817700ax9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/539/10nj7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)






http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/8017/12fz2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/5760/13sl3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Madox58]

Just doing some quick thinking.
I see no reason it would not be compatible with GWX 2.1
JSGME it in and give it a shake down cruise.
:yep:

[Tomi_099]

Just doing some quick thinking.
I see no reason it would not be compatible with GWX 2.1
JSGME it in and give it a shake down cruise.
:yep:
-........................

No the reason is that low mod by the Polygon Cruncher 7 is in such a way reduced that it difficult is to have beautiful model to be gotten.

A correct challenge. With this new Mod the Polygon is higher and it is not reduced. Thus should decay more exactly and more beautiful to be .

We hope so !!!:up:

what du you see picture in action thet is the low mod !!
they was redus to 80.000 poly

[Tomi_099]

@ Prevateer

I think we mast have your Heli ,

so and i think i mast build a Platform to your Heli on my VIIc/41 :rock: :up:

what du you think abaut thet ???:hmm: :roll:

[Uber Gruber]

I tried using the VIIc/41 with GWX but get a CTD just as the game would normally display the "Not so long ago...." screen :cry:

Any news on the VIIc (not VIIc/41) with Rubini's water stream effect ?

Cheers....

[Uber Gruber]

Ahem...<cough>....any news on the VII/C ?

Pretty please with a cherry on top etc.

[Tomi_099]

Ahem...<cough>....any news on the VII/C ?

Pretty please with a cherry on top etc.

..

Sorry !!! Work , Work ,Work

I hope we can this week start. With VIIc, VIIc41, VII-D
:rock:

[Tomi_099]

Also Liebe Freunde , in Zukunft könnt ihr hier die Mods Downloaden


Thus love of friends, in the future know you here the Mods downloading

http://www.1a-gifs.de/gifs/comp-rechner/white-madhack.gif

http://hosted.filefront.com/TomiU99/

[Wolfehunter]

Tomi do you want me to take down your stuff off my site or leave it there?:hmm:

Your call captain.;)

[Tomi_099]

Tomi do you want me to take down your stuff off my site or leave it there?:hmm:

Your call captain.;)

Hello Wolfehanter!!
If it you Disturbing you could not leave the data to your server to me my updated has. … and this is able to permanently …!!!

[Wolfehunter]

Tomi do you want me to take down your stuff off my site or leave it there?:hmm:

Your call captain.;)

Hello Wolfehanter!!
If it you Disturbing you could not leave the data to your server to me my updated has. … and this is able to permanently …!!!

No I don't mind your stuff. I'll keep up dating it. I just want to know your intentions.;) Anyhow I guess it wouldn't be a good thing to stop now when so many sailors out there know where to get your good stuff.:up: Back door pass hehehe.

[Tomi_099]

NEW U-Boot for GWX2.1 in Work !!





http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/7563/84722668un4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/856/81458149xs9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/2751/95893868vc4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)





http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/8726/54070257lg6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)




http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/4927/21872881bg2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Graf Paper]

Now this has got me feeling like a kid waiting for Christmas Day when there's a BIG box under the tree with my name on it! I can hardly wait! :D

That skin looks fantastic, Tomi! I must have it for my u-boat! Is there a place where it can be downloaded?

[Hellraiser]

Looks like MUCH more than a skin!....
That skin has bones underneath!

:rock:

[coronas]

A little step for Tomi, a big jump for SH3 comunity!
Cool, Tomi! :up: :up: :up:

[Tomi_099]

http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/3928/52703220qz7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)




http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/2074/35528148dz2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)




http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/4425/79344735rm1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)




http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/1565/36896809pu6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/6360/15390344vk5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/2647/60548838bq1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/6302/35446685eo7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/2077/8abt6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/2077/8abt6.f5814d1036.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=166&i=8abt6.jpg)

[akdavis]

Wery interesting!

[Tomi_099]

U-826 ( Coning Tower IV )

Who knows a helping??
That is the only photo which I property.
How from the side can the appearance???
Who knows a helping???


I Appreciated

:hmm:
http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/7846/70229361wa1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/6148/u821gy3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


Wer kann Helfen??
Das ist das einzige Photo was ich Habe .
Wie Kann das von der Seite Aussehen???
Wer kann Helfen ???

[Madox58]

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n12/privateer_2006/turmumbau_IV.jpg
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n12/privateer_2006/turmumbau_IV_No_Snorkel.jpg
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n12/privateer_2006/turmumbau_IV_Snorkel.jpg

[Tomi_099]

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n12/privateer_2006/turmumbau_IV.jpg
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n12/privateer_2006/turmumbau_IV_No_Snorkel.jpg
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n12/privateer_2006/turmumbau_IV_Snorkel.jpg
---------------------------------------------

Thanks Privateer !!! - I Belive thets GUT !!!:up:


http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/6330/retring2oz3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/5972/retring3ke9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[LordNeuro"Serbia"]

Now theat is 1 fantastic looking boot. Great work Tomi_099. Just a awsom work. U trully r a master:know:. Keep up the gr9 work:up:

[Uber Gruber]

Sniff....VII/c....sniff...you promised.....sniff......muahhhhhhhh:cry:

[Tomi_099]

http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/9636/3bis9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/2747/4bbr3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


And a NEW Tower build !!

http://img67.imageshack.us/img67/7656/52916315iw5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Tomi_099]

Ein Umstrittenes Bild .
Die Löcher scheinen hier nicht Retuschiert zu sein.
Denn überall sind Sie Schwarz ausgelegt.
Bitte beachten Sie die Breite des Langlochs wie die Breiten der normalen Löcher !!



http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/6060/boot1st6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


The holes do not seem to be retouched here.
Because everywhere you are laid out for black. :hmm:
Please consider the width of the slotted hole like the widths of the normal holes!!

[Madox58]

:hmm:
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n12/privateer_2006/turmumbau_IV_Big.jpg
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n12/privateer_2006/u821gy3.jpg

:yep:

[Tomi_099]

:hmm:
http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/918/5apn3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Madox58]

:88)

Maybe it's one of the many changes not documented.
The Turm IV actually appeared in many forms from research I have found.
But very few pictures I found show them all.
Then there are Turm V and Turm VI versions as well.
:hmm:

[Madox58]

After looking closer at that last photo you posted,
I believe it was doctored.
The hatch is there.
But the photo blurs at a defined line to hide it.
Standard work for the period.
And a very bad job at retouching.

[Myxale]

I wasn't sure why tomi asked about that pic with the flooding holes about it being retoched...

But :hmm: Why would one see it fit to retouch old WWII pics?

Doesn't make sense!

[Tomi_099]

Hallo Privateer,
Given as a fit back from your mod work.
So we can something learn from your work.

I appreciated.
:up:

[Madox58]

I wasn't sure why tomi asked about that pic with the flooding holes about it being retoched...

But :hmm: Why would one see it fit to retouch old WWII pics?

Doesn't make sense!

that picture may have been retouched when it was first released.
Which would have been way back when?
But look close at the top of that rear hatch.
and the area surroundingit.
there is a very defined line then much smugging.
And the shadeing does not fit.

[akdavis]

Hmm...rather odd that the Brits (I assume) would be retouching pictures of German u-boats after the war had ended. Old habits die hard?

[Uber Gruber]

Could it have been initialy released by the germans and thus doctored during the war?

[akdavis]

Could it have been initialy released by the germans and thus doctored during the war?

Only if they also added in the British ensigns. ;)

[Uber Gruber]

Oops...well spotted :oops:

[akdavis]

Oops...well spotted :oops:

Actually, I see that the question was about the flooding holes pic. That one looks like it might be from during the war. I was refering to the hatch pics.

[Tomi_099]

I Love This REAL Wather Stream !!!




http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/1260/40692193sd5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/3659/50654577fk3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/6433/39214127pw5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/11/95139060dn8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/5311/91152130km6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/8281/69375237po0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/7418/63904348hp6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/5936/13954201gg7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/1356/10gd3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/2953/16cb6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/6089/17pb8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/2853/18xs4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Wolfehunter]

Tomi something is wrong with your graphic settings. Steam isn't suppose to look like that I don't think?:hmm:

[Tomi_099]

http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/3108/20ev5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/880/21rr9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Tomi_099]

Tomi something is wrong with your graphic settings. Steam isn't suppose to look like that I don't think?:hmm:
----------------------------

NO ! NO !! I Love this BIG Wather , bat that is Real !! :rock:

[Wolfehunter]

Tomi something is wrong with your graphic settings. Steam isn't suppose to look like that I don't think?:hmm:
----------------------------

NO ! NO !! I Love this BIG Wather , bat that is Real !! :rock:I agree with you to have more water but something is wrong with the pixelated water particles tomi. Looks like big semi transparent cubes on your photos.

[Tomi_099]

Tomi something is wrong with your graphic settings. Steam isn't suppose to look like that I don't think?:hmm:
----------------------------

NO ! NO !! I Love this BIG Wather , bat that is Real !! :rock:I agree with you to have more water but something is wrong with the pixelated water particles tomi. Looks like big semi transparent cubes on your photos.

Well , A Little bit STRONG , Yes I mast chanced the Particle " Picture ":hmm:

[Tomi_099]

I revised WaterStream

http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/6772/1apj7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


..... OLD .....

http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/8233/1bbnr6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/2255/3altgz0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



... OLD ....
http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/9614/4altru9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/2331/43237660xc6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


.... NEW ....
http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/9545/6ass2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)





http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/8976/53887822iv4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/5324/25160938vx3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)




http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/1765/15681992xu5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/279/10xk9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/6058/11fx0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/4273/12wx9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Tomi_099]

http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/1927/15aft8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/6691/16xr8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)





http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/2435/17cp5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/7532/xx2zu1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Venatore]

Prior to release I hope you can provide a plain U-boat without the camouflage scheme, as I'm looking at this awesome set-up from a skinner point of view. If and when these fine looking U-boat/s are released I will be only using this vessel as the template for skins [approval sought of course].

[SpeedyPC]

Tomi_099,

I am very impress with your great work on the u-boat and looking forward to dowload this latest version until you are happy with it.:rock:

Tomi_099 I must say.............well..........let give you a big kiss on your forehead mate, and I better find you a hand full of wolfpack babe ;) :smug: for you to relax and enjoy the full moon howling all night for your next final task of this u-boat.

You will always be the true KING of the u-boat mod, and we all sail with you into the high sea and enjoy the sun rise and also sail into the sun set as well.:rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :up: :up: :up:

[LordNeuro"Serbia"]

Fantastic job. Hope u relise it soon. The boot is a rell beaty. And the flag.Wery nice work. Keep up the great work.:up:

[Wolfehunter]

I revised WaterStream

[/URL]
(http://imageshack.us)


http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/1765/15681992xu5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


[URL="http://imageshack.us"]Much better tomi well done dude.:up:

[Tomi_099]

Tomi_099,

I am very impress with your great work on the u-boat and looking forward to dowload this latest version until you are happy with it.:rock:

Tomi_099 I must say.............well..........let give you a big kiss on your forehead mate, and I better find you a hand full of wolfpack babe ;) :smug: for you to relax and enjoy the full moon howling all night for your next final task of this u-boat.

You will always be the true KING of the u-boat mod, and we all sail with you into the high sea and enjoy the sun rise and also sail into the sun set as well.:rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :up: :up: :up:
....................................

SpeedyPC... thanks, I did not get as a radix complement ever as from you.
I do not hope I make for you dishonor!!

Thanks!!:up:

[Tomi_099]

again and again !!:oops:
I must make still some visible corrections !!


http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/1315/66805984sl8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/7432/68268155iz3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/4265/44486380dn2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)




http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/1737/58776763pb1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Also I had to make new for rivets,
but this week should become finish it!!
i hope so !!!

[Venatore]

I really like the look of this project. I can't wait to skin this variant.

[SeaWolf U-57]

I know that some people will look at the above pictures and say it’s just a German submarine. But to SH3 players this Type VIIC Variant is a work of art. You have combined Grace Beauty and Menace to produce a truly fantastic model. After all the submarine was German engineering at its best and as for you to make this model as realistic as possible can only please every one who see’s and hopefully uses it. ( I want it added to my game now) “TIME is not good when you are the one waiting” and as for Venatore wanting to produce a new skin for it That is really good I love his VIIC Atlantic Workhorse Skin IV although the IXB.1 blue skin would look fantastic on this Variant I just cant wait to see the whole package finished. Please keep up the good work :up:

[Tomi_099]

VIIC goas to VIID ;)



http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/7558/78038158pc5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/1203/72495124ly5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/1628/88192687mz3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)




http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/6427/22881663gt3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/2416/62017233sd9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img74.imageshack.us/img74/4876/50408079oa9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img74.imageshack.us/img74/9285/66884838bh3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/2111/10ni1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img74.imageshack.us/img74/2074/11yn6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)




http://img74.imageshack.us/img74/3521/12yy7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)





http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/8936/13pf9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Myxale]

Das is ja toll!

:rock:

[Tomi_099]

Fixet Hull from VIID

http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/3892/13hn0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/1114/17nl3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/1460/18avr1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
:hmm:


http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/676/19xc8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Wolfehunter]

:o :huh: :rock: Holy $%!+ comes to mind.... Totally awesome Tomi.:up:

[SpeedyPC]

Totally awesome Tomi I could just kiss you mate, now speaking about this boat mate when is she ready for hunting you know she very hungry for sinking ships.:up: :up:

[Tomi_099]

http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/2657/20eq5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/8513/21jt1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/1082/22yh0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

:smug:

http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/6264/23rl8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

:hmm:

http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/8266/24ps3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[skwasjer]

You are one gifted modeller, Tomi...

Simply mindblowing :yep:

[Tomi_099]

A small difference between Silent Hunter III VII-D ( Hull ) and Rewell mod :roll:


http://img172.imageshack.us/img172/4419/25rg6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


Fixet the Model to the Left Sight !!

http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/7331/32ny6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/129/33fw4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/3716/34vl3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Tomi_099]

TEST THE HULL VII-D !!
:smug:
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/6273/35alx6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

:know:
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/8703/36ahp0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/112/37auv3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

:hmm:


http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/7865/38ang9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

AND THEN A SHI$$&*/-????

http://img112.imageshack.us/img112/3284/40aob4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

RED ALART !!!!

[Jimbuna]

Truly amazing work Tomi http://www.psionguild.org/forums/images/smilies/wolfsmilies/thumbsup.gif

[Tomi_099]

Corrected Deck, also a new deck are in work ;)


http://img76.imageshack.us/img76/9104/41jq6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)





http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/8884/42wh2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


also a new deck are in work :hmm:


http://img76.imageshack.us/img76/8998/43hr2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Wolfehunter]

Tomi with the new deck. Will the drain holes on the deck be indented so water will look like its going down in it? It could give the illusion of water draining if the holes are slightly lower than the deck plating? Maybe?:hmm:

[Tomi_099]

Tomi with the new deck. Will the drain holes on the deck be indented so water will look like its going down in it? It could give the illusion of water draining if the holes are slightly lower than the deck plating? Maybe?:hmm:

--------------------------------

Hallo Wolfehunter eine Sehr gute Idee.
Das habe ich auch versucht bei meinen neuen Mulitisub Projekt.
Das Resultat war ein Chresh ( CTD ) , vermutlich ist der Speicher Überfordert.
Es kann sein das er So viele Kleine Löcher nicht akzeptiert.
Ich werde noch einen Versuch Starten, allerdings werden die Löcher, eine Vertiefung Sein und das Deck wird ein verbundenes Teil sein.

Also ein ganzes teil ohne Löcher nur eine Vertiefung.
Ich hoffe ihr versteht was ich meine.

Hello Wolfehunter a very much good idea.
I have that also tried with my new Mulitisub project.
The result was a Chresh (CTD),
probably is overtaxed the memory.

It can be which it so many small holes not accepted.
I become still another attempt starting, however the holes will be a recess and the deck a connected part will be.

Thus a whole part without holes only a recess.
I hope it understand which I mean. :hmm:

[Wolfehunter]

You could try not making a complete hole but a dent in the surface shaped as a hole. ------______-----______--- something like this? Or maybe I'm just crazy hehehe. :up: What do you think?

[Tomi_099]

VII-D .. U-218 Late ;)


http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/8913/1atl6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/8780/4amw9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/9835/5aea3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/1674/6axs9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/493/a1te5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Pascal]

Tomi with the new deck. Will the drain holes on the deck be indented so water will look like its going down in it? It could give the illusion of water draining if the holes are slightly lower than the deck plating? Maybe?:hmm:

--------------------------------

Hallo Wolfehunter eine Sehr gute Idee.
Das habe ich auch versucht bei meinen neuen Mulitisub Projekt.
Das Resultat war ein Chresh ( CTD ) , vermutlich ist der Speicher Überfordert.
Es kann sein das er So viele Kleine Löcher nicht akzeptiert.
Ich werde noch einen Versuch Starten, allerdings werden die Löcher, eine Vertiefung Sein und das Deck wird ein verbundenes Teil sein.

Also ein ganzes teil ohne Löcher nur eine Vertiefung.
Ich hoffe ihr versteht was ich meine.

Hello Wolfehunter a very much good idea.
I have that also tried with my new Mulitisub project.
The result was a Chresh (CTD),
probably is overtaxed the memory.

It can be which it so many small holes not accepted.
I become still another attempt starting, however the holes will be a recess and the deck a connected part will be.

Thus a whole part without holes only a recess.
I hope it understand which I mean. :hmm:


Please try with holes closed; your magnifique 3D work on hull in general is much more important than these open little holes ...

[Task Force]

Ive been looking at this prodject even before I joined subsim. Great work and this sub looks great.:D

[Tomi_099]

U-218 EARLY !!!


http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/2524/5acm5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)



http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/1145/6ace6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Myxale]

:rock:Du meine Güte! Amazing!:up::rock:

[Wolfehunter]

:o :dead: :huh: WOW!:rock:

[Dietrich]

Tomi,

Wie immer ist Ihre Arbeit toll! Sind die 3D-Modell-Änderungen nur im Rumpf, oder machen Sie auch Änderungen im Turm? Sind die Minen-Abteilungen ein Teil des Rumpfes oder des Turms?
------------------
As always, your work is great! Are the 3D model alterations only on the hull, or are you doing them to the conning tower too? Are the mine-compartments part of the hull or the conning tower?

[Tomi_099]

Tomi,

Wie immer ist Ihre Arbeit toll! Sind die 3D-Modell-Änderungen nur im Rumpf, oder machen Sie auch Änderungen im Turm? Sind die Minen-Abteilungen ein Teil des Rumpfes oder des Turms?
------------------
As always, your work is great! Are the 3D model alterations only on the hull, or are you doing them to the conning tower too? Are the mine-compartments part of the hull or the conning tower?

---------------------------------

that is one very well asks!!!
I am not safe me,
but perhaps one should leave the mine-compartments part on the hull.
There one can use the other towers, and a Campagne from 1941-45 drive from U-218 .:hmm:

I would like to make a tower in the few photos those of this submarine existing.

[Dietrich]

Tomi,

Ich vermute es ist einfacher als Turm-Mod, aber das ist natürlich Ihre Entscheidung. Trotzdem, wenn Sie die Menü-Grafik wollen, schick mir einfach die Modell-Dateien und ich mache sie (genauso wie mein Arbeit für die Typ-XXIII Projekt).
-----------
I suspect it might be easier as a tower mod, but that's your call, of course. Regardless, when you need the menu graphics, just send me the 3D model files and I'll do them for your (just like my work on the Type-XXIII project).

Zum Beispiel / For Example : http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/2608/typ2331vn6.jpg

[Tomi_099]

Tomi,

Ich vermute es ist einfacher als Turm-Mod, aber das ist natürlich Ihre Entscheidung. Trotzdem, wenn Sie die Menü-Grafik wollen, schick mir einfach die Modell-Dateien und ich mache sie (genauso wie mein Arbeit für die Typ-XXIII Projekt).
-----------
I suspect it might be easier as a tower mod, but that's your call, of course. Regardless, when you need the menu graphics, just send me the 3D model files and I'll do them for your (just like my work on the Type-XXIII project).

Zum Beispiel / For Example : http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/2608/typ2331vn6.jpg


################################################## ###
Hallo Dietrich freu mich auf die Zusammenarbeit.:up:

[Dietrich]

As far as I can tell, the VIID will replace one of the type-VII boats. Which one? (For example, in the Type-XXIII project, we replaced the Type-XXI). If there's been no decision it it, probably the best one to replace will be the VIIC/42. I am aware that the hull modificatoins will affect the VIIC, VIIC/41 and VIIC/42, but that's okay. However, I'll need to alter the tower assignments.

The main thing will be to generate new tower menu graphics. As soon as the tower is operational I'll be able to do this. If there is only a single tower, I'll need to know how many Flak platforms there will be so I can configure the Basic.cfg file.

Reference:
http://www.u-boote-online.de/typen/typ_viid.html

[Tomi_099]

As far as I can tell, the VIID will replace one of the type-VII boats. Which one? (For example, in the Type-XXIII project, we replaced the Type-XXI). If there's been no decision it it, probably the best one to replace will be the VIIC/42. I am aware that the hull modificatoins will affect the VIIC, VIIC/41 and VIIC/42, but that's okay. However, I'll need to alter the tower assignments.

The main thing will be to generate new tower menu graphics. As soon as the tower is operational I'll be able to do this. If there is only a single tower, I'll need to know how many Flak platforms there will be so I can configure the Basic.cfg file.

Reference:
http://www.u-boote-online.de/typen/typ_viid.html
************************************************** ***************


Also habe ich das so verstanden !!
Um eine erfolgreiche Campagne durchzuführen haben wir Standart ins SH3 eine 7bHülle und eine 7cHülle und eine VIIc41Hülle die Identisch sind,
im Campagne wird aber bei GWX2.1 immer die VIIc41 angezogen bei einer Campagne ( mir ist das ein Rätzel )

hinzu kommen drei 7B türme und neun 7C Türme, davon sind identische Turm1 / 7/8/9

Also soll ich die VII-D in eine VIIC41( von GWX2.1 ) einfügen.
Oder soll ich eine VIIC42 machen die du dann in die Campagne einfügst.
Ist das überhaupt möglich ????
…..
Thus I understood in such a way!!
Around a successful Campagne to accomplish we have standard in the SH3 a 7bHull and a 7cHull and a VIIc41Hull the identical are,
in the Campagne however with GWX2.1 always the VIIc41 attraction with a Campagne (me that is a Mysteri)

in addition come three 7B Towers up and nine 7C of towers,
of it is identical Turm1/7/8/9

Thus I am to insert the VII-D into a VIIC41 (of GWX2.1). Or am I a VIIC42 making which you then into the Campagne insert.

Is that at all possible ???? http://207.44.214.111/subsim.com/radioroom/cid:image001.gif@01C8F157.63712F70

[Tomi_099]

In Work !!

http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/8875/69463369lo5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Have you eny Orginal - Photos of this Interiar of Tower ?? of this ( Karabinerhaken )

http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/6334/21625146af1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)




http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/995/13285236jk5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Tomi_099]

AND A NEW RELING


:hmm:
http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/671/relingnw9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)




http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/7212/reling4xg2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[lutzow]

For this model i'm waiting too;)
You're magician, man:yep: you know?

:rock:Farewell, Tomi :up:

[Dietrich]

I've been doing some work on the VIID mod, mostly on menu graphics. I hope to have something to show soon.

One thing I was doing, however, was seeing if I could model this as a NEW conning tower, rather than a reaplcement of an existing one. As the files I've got are a replacement for the VIIC/3 tower (and the tower I'm using is the late war VIID variant -- the VIID/2 tower), then I'm trying to see if I can abandon use of the 7c_3 and use 7d_2 instead.

So... in the file Basic.cfg, there are sections for conning towers. I've added an ned conning tower type:



[CONING_TYPE13] ;VIID/2 ; <-- VIID/2
Idx=13
Year=1939;43
Month=1
SubNb=3
SubType0=1
SubVersion0=1
SubType1=1
SubVersion1=2
SubType2=1
SubVersion2=3
M01=1
A01=8
A02=8
S01=4
Renown=1000
and have also added one in the list:


[Z01]
DaysSpent=21
NbGuns=14 ; <-- VIID/2
Idx0=0
Dummy0=data/objects/Turm2a_1_hd
Idx1=1
Dummy1=data/objects/Turm2d_1_hd
Idx2=2
Dummy2=data/objects/Turm2d_2_hd
Idx3=3
Dummy3=data/objects/Turm7b_1_hd
Idx4=4
Dummy4=data/objects/Turm7b_2_hd
Idx5=5
Dummy5=data/objects/Turm7c_1_hd
Idx6=6
Dummy6=data/objects/Turm7c_2_hd
Idx7=7
Dummy7=data/objects/Turm7c_3_hd
Idx8=8
Dummy8=data/objects/Turm7c_4_hd
Idx9=9
Dummy9=data/objects/Turm9c_1_hd
Idx10=10
Dummy10=data/objects/Turm9c_2_hd
Idx11=11
Dummy11=data/objects/Turm9c_3_hd
Idx12=12
Dummy12=NULL; data/objects/Turm21_hd
Idx13=13 ; <-- VIID/2
Dummy13=data/objects/Turm7d_2_hd ; <-- VIID/2

Finally, I've altered the U-boat to use this tower (this used to be Z01_00=7 which, for the "replaced" VIIC/3 turm, worked fine):

Z01_00=13 ; VIID/2 ; <--- VIID Late war
M01_00=1
A01_00=6
A02_00=6
S01_00=4

Then, I've copied the old Turm7c_3 files to Turm7d_2. I now have:

Turm7d_2_hd.cam
Turm7d_2_hd.dat
Turm7d_2_hd.sim
Turm7d_2_hd.val
Turm7d_2_hd.zon

I've inspected all of these with Silent 3ditor 0.9, and have noted that only Turm7d_2.dat has old references to the 7c_3. I've changed all of these over.

I've also created a new file:

\data\Menu\cfg\game\conning_barracks_13.cfg



Okay... so with all that done, when I run the game, and select that boat (in a LAN game, for easy testing), the boat appears, but with no conning tower whatsoever. This means that keys like F3, F4, B, O, etc. don't work and from external view (F12), I see the hull, but with no tower.

What I'm wondering, is whether creating a new tower is actually an impossible task (like creating a new U-boat type).

Has anyone else ever managed it?

And, if so, does anyone have any ideas of other areas in the data files that might need changing that I've missed?

Thanks!

[Task Force]

Cant wait Tomi 099, This model looks great. I wish the other Stock SH3 models looked like this.:D What is the current Poly count on this model.

[Dietrich]

Okay... I've not managed to crack the problem of adding a new playable Turm type into the game, so I'll stick with the replacing the VIIC/3 with the VIID/2 Turm. Here's a screenshot of the boat, as I'm using it in Multiplayer games...

http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/8290/viid02ya4.jpg

... and here's a shot of my initial work on the menu graphics.

http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/8465/viid04td4.jpg

There's still a bit to go, and I'm not yet happy with the menu graphics under damaged conditions. I'm still working on it though...

[Jimbuna]

Coming along nicely http://www.psionguild.org/forums/images/smilies/wolfsmilies/thumbsup.gif

[Tomi_099]

:up: Thanks’ boys, you are great!!!:up:

It is a lot of work for this Project, and something helps for this VII-D it is weary good for as.
Great Yob you Dan for as Dietrich (Thanks ), are you familiar with 3D-Max or other 3D-Programms ??? .
A little help was I need.

I wood like to have a Open Door by the Tower and you can the See above inner interier in the Tower.
By diving was the Door automatic closed?
One resolution is, we have one Torpedo animation door , and a Rotation this to 90 degrees.
:hmm:
The second resolution is like DD and open Hetch, we build two Doors.
One Door open (open (visible)) by driving on the Watersurface ,
and one Closed by diving.

That s my idée, or you are have better resolution???:roll:

For more good ideas ore resolution by you ore ather caloins , that was bi great!!!!
http://img53.imageshack.us/img53/8117/8turmtypviicim5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

I appreciated :yep:

PS: Dietrich
On the 46Site you can See the Drove of U213 , so you cud have two big picture from Left Side of the VII-D Sub,
so you can merge this two Picture and you have one original Pick from Hull
.
.
..

[Wolfehunter]

Hello tomi,

I've been testing it and found a problem with your water steam attachement which causes ctds.

Now I've included the mod list I have and your is ontop of all the mods.

CapZapEmblemsPack
Beethoven's Symphonies
Lutzow Music Mod 5.0
Pacos_German_Folklore_SubEmblems_Mod_V1.2
AOTD-AA-Ship-Schleuse-Bugfix
Multiskin_Bismark_Tirpitz
GWX - Contact Color
DD_all_types_OH_V2
Thomsen's Sound Pack V3-2
Reworked GWX SH.sdl file for Ultimate Aircraft Soundmod
Ultimate Aircraft Soundmod
OLCE2
Rbs7Flags
VIIB_splashwave_fix
RB_Rubini_combo_wakefix_exhaust
WH_VIIB_Plain_2048
Testskins
OLCE2 - Adjusted GWX 2.1 Normal Particle Effects (with reflections)
Tomi_2X_VIIC41-GWX2-1-1
Tomi_2X_VIIC41-water_steam-2

When I play a game I can run it only with the default 2x_GWX2.1-1 file your first one with the list above.

I would appreciate any info you have.

Thanks tomi

WH

By the way your PM is full.

[Task Force]

So when is it going to be released.:D

[SeaWolf U-57]

I have a mod that is only of your Turm that i have been asked for if you would not like me to release it please let me know

[Task Force]

Is this in beta, I hear people talking about some of there issues with is?:-?

[Wolfehunter]

Its beta and I believe tomi will release it when its finished. Better working than buggy. Please be patient pls.

Happy hunting.:up:

[Dietrich]

Just to report a problem. I was doing some tests with Tomi_099's version and noted that I was "visible" at 15m or less. That is, if my depth rose above 15m below the surface, merchants would open fire at me with machine guns, deck guns, etc.

Even though no part of the U-boat 3D model was breaking the surface, they seemed to know I was there. I tested this repeatedly and even in the middle of a convoy, if I drop below 15m they stop firing, and re-open fire again if I rise above 15m.

I'm wondering what this might be. I'm also wondering what the alterations were in sensors.dat.

@ Tomi_099 ... Was eigentlich ist in sensors.dat/som/zon verändert?

[Myxale]

Just to report a problem. I was doing some tests with Tomi_099's version and noted that I was "visible" at 15m or less. That is, if my depth rose above 15m below the surface, merchants would open fire at me with machine guns, deck guns, etc.

Even though no part of the U-boat 3D model was breaking the surface, they seemed to know I was there. I tested this repeatedly and even in the middle of a convoy, if I drop below 15m they stop firing, and re-open fire again if I rise above 15m.

I'm wondering what this might be. I'm also wondering what the alterations were in sensors.dat.

@ Tomi_099 ... Was eigentlich ist in sensors.dat/som/zon verändert?


This is well known, and Tomi is aware of that. It's because the collision Box of the Antenna! (Eine Box is in der tat außerhalb des boot!)

:up:

[Tomi_099]

Hallo Leute
das was Wolfi hat ist die Variante die auf meinen Letzten Bildern zu sehen sind und die auf den
man auf den Vidio anschauen kann.
Eine VII/c 41 .
Hinzugekommen sind mehrere waterstrims die den U-Boot eine Realistisches aussehen
geben sollen

zusätzlich wurde die letzte Arbeit von Racerboy übernommen die Dynamischen Waterspreat
in einen Sturm ein Realistisches verhalten gibt.
Es wurden wurde die Texturen des Wasser geändert , und die Wake des U-Bootes überarbeitet.

Zu den Problem was mir Kopfzerbrechen verursacht , und ich den Fehler nicht finden konnte.

Bei Wolfi und manchen Spielern in der Vergangenheit wurde berichtet das , das
Game zu einen Cresch verursacht.
Ich selber habe das eigentlich bis zu 3x erlebt , aber nur bei der ersten Installation .
danach nicht mehr.

Zu Größeren Updates ist es leider nicht gekommen da ich mit dem Interier der Typ IIA/B
Sehr beschäftigt bin.

Vielleicht findet sich jemand unter euch der der Sache nachgehen möchte .

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1X_GWX2.1_Water_Stream_for_Uboats_V21
2X_GWX2.1_ VIIC41_ PlaySub_V21
3X_GWX2.1_VIIC41_WaterSTream_V21

Hello Boys !!
which was seen Wolfi is the variant in my last pictures is and which one can look at on the Vidio
a VII/c 41.

Were added several waterstrims those the submarine realistic look to give are additionally the last work of Racerboy transferred the dynamic Waterspreat to a storm a realistic gives with restraint.

The textures water were changed and the Wake of the submarine revises.

To the problem which me headaches caused and I could not find the error.

With Wolfi and some players in the past reported that,
that Game to a Cresch causes.
I actually experienced up to 3x, but only with the first installation.

afterwards no more.
To larger updates it is unfortunately I with the Interior the type IIA/B is very not come there busy.
Perhaps someone is among you to find this mystery error.

Thanks !!:roll:

[Wolfehunter]

Opps I see my mistake. Tomi I'm putting it on hold till I get my new rig setup.

Then I will beable to really test it..:yep:

[Dietrich]

Just to report a problem. I was doing some tests with Tomi_099's version and noted that I was "visible" at 15m or less.

This is well known, and Tomi is aware of that.
Perhaps not "well known" enough? I'm really sorry, but I didn't know about it, and I'm supposedly working on this project too. I just thought it might help to draw attention to it. :oops:

From what I understand, Tomi has moved off the VIID (and even the VIIC/41) in favour of new work on the Type-II interiors. In which case, I'll try to carry on with the VIID work. Is anyone else working on it too?

I've now isolated the problem antenna. It is a single vertex ausfahrende Stabantenne. It is clearly shown here:

http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/9249/viid08at9.png

So, I started by simply reducing the height of this to make it shorter than the other antennae on the conning tower. Here is a close-up image of the antennae. In it, you can see that I have dropped the ausfahrende Stabantenne to match the others.

http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/3098/viid13pq0.jpg

However, the improvement was negligible. The boat was still being shot at at about 14.5m deep. I then tried reducing all antennae heights. Here's the wire-frame model in the editor.

http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/5193/viid10mg5.png

When rendered in 3D, it looks like this...

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/9503/viid12lm5.jpg

In this configuration, I seem to be okay at periscope depth. The next screenshot shows this. The depth gauge reads 13m, but the armed merchant is not firing. I took the boat to Schnorkel depth (12.5) and the ship opened fire... even though I did not deploy the Schnorkel. On returning to periscope depth the gun fire ceased. The ship had lost visual contact.

http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/9357/viid11lq3.jpg

Further work is needed on this, but I know now that I'm on the right track. According to the general assembly ( http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/9344/plantypviidnj7.png ), I'm not sure those antennae are supposed to be there, so I'll try further reductions.

[Wolfehunter]

Very good work dietrich.:rock:

[Madox58]

Part of the problem may be that the Engine sees thing as a bounding box.
Poke up a pole at the front and rear of the hull so it passes
beyond periscope depth and see what happens.
If at periscope depth, with those poles sticking up just a bit,
scope down,
and you get fired on?
It would prove my theory.
If not fired on?
It would disprove my theory.

[Wolfehunter]

Part of the problem may be that the Engine sees thing as a bounding box.
Poke up a pole at the front and rear of the hull so it passes
beyond periscope depth and see what happens.
If at periscope depth, with those poles sticking up just a bit,
scope down,
and you get fired on?
It would prove my theory.
If not fired on?
It would disprove my theory.I think your right Privateer. also those antennas would surface the water. If the U-boat could be lowered? Or those items tweaked?

[Dietrich]

Update:

Just to let everyone know, I'm still working on the VIID mod, although I have been concentrating on the player-launched SMA (http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=140078) mines recently. As they are now nearly ready for use, I've started revisiting the work that had been done on the VIID.

What I need now, is a bit of historical research, and I was wondering if others could help.

From what I can tell, there are two types of conning towers for the VIID. The first "original" one looks like this...

http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/5823/viid36rx7.jpg


The later one, looks like this...

http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/8112/u218turmpd8.jpg

Note how in the second variant, there has been a platform built over part of the mine-shaft silos, so that a heavy 3,7cm/69 M42 (REF (http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNGER_37mm-69_mk42.htm)).

The Turm that I am currently using is this modified Turm. It looks like this...

http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/8465/viid04td4.jpg

That screenshot is an old one, but it does show the length of the mine silos and the position of the Flak. Now, however, there is a mine launcher too (Tube 6) and the internal reserves will be the mines to be deployed. By adjusting the reload time to a few seconds, I can simulate being able to launch mines at will, as if they were being launched from the vertical shafts. I've tested this, and it works quite well.

http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/6422/viid37zt8.jpg

(For the record, the above minefield claimed a C2 Cargo ship and damaged a small merchant. :yep: )

What I don't know, and this is what I'm asking help for, is whether the modified tower reduce the mine capacity.

So, I know that the original tower had 15 mines... 5 shafts of 3.

Looking at the images of the modified tower, there are only two shaft covers visible. Does this mean that only 2 shafts of 3 SMAs could be used... that is, 6 mines in total? Or was it still possible to somehow access the other shafts to include a full complement of mines?

Any hints, ideas or references would be most welcome! Thanks everyone.

[Wolfehunter]

What I would suggest dietrich is to get a working mod out. Set it up according to tomi's VIID model tower.

Let the public test it for a while routing out any possible bugs. Once perfected then make final correction on your mod bringing it closer to historical records.

My guess is with the 2 shafts they may have reworked the insides to accommodate 15 mines to be used by the 2 shafts? Or they stored less mines?

;)

[Dietrich]

The main work so far has been on the SMA mines. These have now been released as part of the U-boat Armaments mod (link (http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147445)). I don't think there is much point simply re-releasing Tomi's VIID tower at this stage. However, it does make sense to complete the historical research and understand how many SMA mines the VIID carried in the two different tower configurations.

[TorpedoMo]

What I need now, is a bit of historical research, and I was wondering if others could help.


Here are some pics I found in my "library". Source: Uboote im Focus
More model pics for you dietrich I uploaded to my FF-Page, package called VIID.
Get it there, maybe they can help. Also there is a blueprint of a VIID.

http://hosted.filefront.com/Torpedowaffe


http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/7913/viid2yp8.jpghttp://img217.imageshack.us/img217/4378/viid5vh9.jpghttp://img217.imageshack.us/img217/5676/viid4kf1.jpghttp://img207.imageshack.us/img207/4229/viid3cq2.jpghttp://img217.imageshack.us/img217/9327/viid7fu2.jpghttp://img217.imageshack.us/img217/5184/viidpi3.jpghttp://img217.imageshack.us/img217/5165/viid6yc0.jpg

[Dietrich]

Thanks for the pictures & files, TorpedoMo. I'll sift through it in detail and then post again.

[{1.SS}Eberhardt]

Where can we download Tomi's conning tower with the snorkel tubes and mesh wire and all that good stuff? Is it even out yet?
Whoever is working on this mod, thank you!

:rock:

[coronas]

@Eberhardt: Try in Wolfehunter site under Tomi099 work.
http://hosted.filefront.com/Wolfehunter :salute:

[Otto Heinzmeir]

Is the VII-D still available for d/l? The link in the original post gives page not found.

[{1.SS}Eberhardt]

Thank you good sir. :salute:

[{1.SS}Eberhardt]

Here's a screeny of the VIID in action:

http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/857/sh3img2422009162637330.png (http://imageshack.us)
Sailing through the flames of a Hawker Hurricane i just shot down in the straits of Gibraltar.

I did notice the issue with the antenna's being above the water at periscope depth and the enemy having visual contact due to this, even though i could barely see the antenna myself lol.
Also when i dove to snorkel depth there was about 1 foot of the turm above water.
Thanks to anyone who help put this all together so far, it is truly a work of art!

[Sepp von Ch.]

Can someone pleae reupload this mod with playable VIID U-Boot? Can I use this mod with GWX 3.0?

[frau kaleun]

Can someone pleae reupload this mod with playable VIID U-Boot? Can I use this mod with GWX 3.0?

ftp://hartmuthaas.no-ip.org/Volume_2/Sharing/SH3COMMUNITYMODS/TOMI_099/

username: Maik
password: Woelfe

I think it may be the fourth one down on the list. If so, I'd say it was designed for use with GWX based on the name - but which version, I couldn't say. If there is a readme file in the download it will probably have more information. :yep:

[Sepp von Ch.]

Danke Frau Kaleun!:salute:

[frau kaleun]

Gern geschehen. :DL

[Jimbuna]

It should work fine.

[VONHARRIS]

Is it possible to lay mines with VIID in the game?

[Myxale]

Is it possible to lay mines with VIID in the game?

No, sadly not possible.

The day our modders crack that nut, will be epic.

[VONHARRIS]

No, sadly not possible.

The day our modders crack that nut, will be epic.

I may be wrong but in this mod http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147445
it stated that it has playable mines , as very slow running (0,5 kts) torpedoes.

I haven't tried yet because I am in the middle of a patrol but I am willing to give it a shot.

[Sepp von Ch.]

---------- U-213--------

http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/1227/39nt9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/572/40ek7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/8587/35qy0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

http://img460.imageshack.us/img460/8118/32pf9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)




------------ U-217 ------------
Playable
http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/5391/1pgx7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/9764/7pwj1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

- U-218 -
http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/8612/w1abr8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Shot at 2007-08-17

http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/6420/w2avt0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Shot at 2007-08-17

http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/6168/w3ayv3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Shot at 2007-08-17

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/382/w5ajj5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Shot at 2007-08-17



Gentlemen, I found "only" the VIID 1945 Mod - http://s17.postimage.org/tlge0iiqj/VIID_1.jpg (http://postimage.org/image/tlge0iiqj/)


but I really love standard VIID with older turm. Has anyone seen such mod from Tomi_099 with this wonderful VIID Boat with older turm (as in screens in first post here http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showpost.php?p=621628&postcount=1 and on the screens from Tomi_099 above)????

[U-SERB]

Few years ago I had mod for laying mines...
I think I still have it, somewhere on my pc. It's contact mines from tubes, and procedure was like firing torpedoes, except torpedo you "fire" mines and they stay afloat!

[U-SERB]

If anybody solve problem with laying mines, I think that other "problem" will be results of that action.

It means that we will be unable to see result of our mine field. It is historical correct, but we all wish to know if we sunk any ships. :arrgh!:

Also, problem is in SH3 stock. We can lay mines, and if we be etc. 100 km away from field and some ship sunk on our mines, we will not get any information in the game. :/\\!!

[Madox58]

I don't think there is 100% credits or reporting on ships sunk by mines dureing WWII anyway.

As long as you complete your mission to lay them what does it really matter?

Call it 'The Fog of War' and play.
:up:

[U-SERB]

I don't think there is 100% credits or reporting on ships sunk by mines dureing WWII anyway.

As long as you complete your mission to lay them what does it really matter?

Call it 'The Fog of War' and play.
:up:


I am pretty sure there is 100% credits on ship sunk or damaged by u-boat mines during WW2...
:know:

I agree, it doesn't really matter, but it will be nice to know results of your mission.

Like this very successful patrol of mine-laying boat U-118...
http://uboat.net/boats/patrols/patrol_3781.html

All ships hit mines during time of 3th patrol.
In SH3 we will not get information if we are miles away... :/\\!! :/\\!! :/\\!!

[Madox58]

So hang around and get the credit if that's your cup of tea.
Over 1 million mines were laid off the Atlantic coast to prevent a landing by the allies.
Your telling me that all ships sunk by mines were credited to the layers of those mines?

You'll have to prove that to me.

[U-SERB]

So hang around and get the credit if that's your cup of tea.
Over 1 million mines were laid off the Atlantic coast to prevent a landing by the allies.
Your telling me that all ships sunk by mines were credited to the layers of those mines?

You'll have to prove that to me.

My friend,
I said, according to web page uboat.net there is almost 100% credits for German U-boat mine-laying operations.

I don't say for all mines off the Atlantic coast... Of course its impossible to credit all ships sunk by mines, but it's pretty easy for German u-boat.

There wasn't so much u-boat mine-laying mission during WW2...

It is not my cup of tea, I just said it would be nice to know in SH3 Commander or SH3 patrol report, result of you minefield... :salute:

[Madox58]

OK. I see your point.
Still it would be fun just to lay the mines.
:yep:

[U-SERB]

OK. I see your point.
Still it would be fun just to lay the mines.
:yep:

Of course! It would be better than nothing! :D

[Sepp von Ch.]

Nobody?:wah:

[U-SERB]

Nobody?:wah:

Obviously....:wah: