![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Valhalla
Posts: 5,295
Downloads: 141
Uploads: 17
|
![]()
70,000lbs apparently:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
This link and video show why this aircraft is still a valuable aircraft and why it's still in service.
Great link. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
Most impressive and approximately three times the capacity of the UK's last bomber, the Vulcan.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() Quote:
Operation Black Buck https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Black_Buck |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Gefallen Engel U-666
|
![]()
Forget the fancy-dan stealth bombers; can you imagine some Russian sitting with his thumb on the 'switch' in his all rubles-paid bunker, and he knows every B-52 in the US is headed his way...and the threat is still viable since '55!!!. The B-52's official name Stratofortress is rarely used; informally, the aircraft has become informally referred to as the BUFF (Big Ugly Fat ****er) (well, bombing should be an 'informal' affair imho
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness?!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
Not wishing to stray off topic but the B-52 of today would probably resort to stand-off weapons because there chances of survival in an area with modern state of the art missile and fighter air defences (Russia being an obvious choice/example) would be very low indeed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Gefallen Engel U-666
|
![]()
^Duly considered and let them think that:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness?!! |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|