![]() |
B-52 bomber - weapon capacity
|
This link and video show why this aircraft is still a valuable aircraft and why it's still in service.
Great link. :up: |
Most impressive and approximately three times the capacity of the UK's last bomber, the Vulcan.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Operation Black Buck https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Black_Buck |
Nuthin good goes outta style BBY
Forget the fancy-dan stealth bombers; can you imagine some Russian sitting with his thumb on the 'switch' in his all rubles-paid bunker, and he knows every B-52 in the US is headed his way...and the threat is still viable since '55!!!. The B-52's official name Stratofortress is rarely used; informally, the aircraft has become informally referred to as the BUFF (Big Ugly Fat ****er) (well, bombing should be an 'informal' affair imho:O:) 2012: 85 were in active service with nine in reserve. His first thought: "Почему мы не имеем их также?" His second thought: "Hasta la Vista ...Comerade BBY"!:dead::woot:https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ping_bombs.jpgWe'll call the 1 Nuke in the payload the "cookie" to keep our RAF buddies enthused. :shifty: http://warontherocks.com/2016/06/we-already-have-an-arsenal-plane-its-called-the-b-52/
|
Not wishing to stray off topic but the B-52 of today would probably resort to stand-off weapons because there chances of survival in an area with modern state of the art missile and fighter air defences (Russia being an obvious choice/example) would be very low indeed.
|
NOE: nap of the earth tactics
^Duly considered and let them think that:
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.