SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-23-15, 03:03 PM   #1
Hawk66
Commodore
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 609
Downloads: 36
Uploads: 0
Default Hunt for Red November

So, our British friends have completely dissolved their Nimrods with no replacement. Is this article true ?

It would be quite astonishing. I've read they should be replaced by 9 P-8 but I am asking myself if this is sufficient for a country for which a navy and ASW capabilities is so important.

So, it seems not only Germany has issues with its defense budget these days...
Hawk66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-15, 03:24 PM   #2
AndyJWest
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

They had to scrap Nimrod to pay for the aircraft carriers they can't afford the aircraft for...
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-15, 06:36 AM   #3
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,451
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJWest View Post
They had to scrap Nimrod to pay for the aircraft carriers they can't afford the aircraft for...
Pretty much sums it up.

@Hawk

The process of scrapping Nimrod commenced way back in January 2011.
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is online   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-15, 12:09 PM   #4
Mike Abberton
Electrician's Mate
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 135
Downloads: 42
Uploads: 0
Default

Looks like they are taking a lead from the USN and scaling back the Type 26 before they even start manufacturing.
Mike Abberton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-15, 02:03 PM   #5
CaptainRamius
Sonar Guy
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: In shallow waters
Posts: 388
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJWest View Post
They had to scrap Nimrod to pay for the aircraft carriers they can't afford the aircraft for...
And then to pay for the aircraft too
CaptainRamius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-15, 10:30 AM   #6
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

They scrapped Nimrod as to be fair it was long overdue, massively over budget and the numbers to be getting procured were going steadily downwards.

It was a botched programme from the beginning. Typical of BAe Systems.

However they should of and could of funded a replacement from existing systems.

8 P-8s should be sufficient.
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-15, 11:07 AM   #7
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

"Could of"? "Should of"?

__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.