![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 609
Downloads: 36
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
So, our British friends have completely dissolved their Nimrods with no replacement. Is this article true ?
It would be quite astonishing. I've read they should be replaced by 9 P-8 but I am asking myself if this is sufficient for a country for which a navy and ASW capabilities is so important. So, it seems not only Germany has issues with its defense budget these days... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
They had to scrap Nimrod to pay for the aircraft carriers they can't afford the aircraft for...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() Quote:
@Hawk The process of scrapping Nimrod commenced way back in January 2011. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Electrician's Mate
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 135
Downloads: 42
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Looks like they are taking a lead from the USN and scaling back the Type 26 before they even start manufacturing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: May 2014
Location: In shallow waters
Posts: 388
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
They scrapped Nimrod as to be fair it was long overdue, massively over budget and the numbers to be getting procured were going steadily downwards.
It was a botched programme from the beginning. Typical of BAe Systems. However they should of and could of funded a replacement from existing systems. 8 P-8s should be sufficient. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
"Could of"? "Should of"?
![]() ![]()
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|