![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 786
Downloads: 254
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Couple questions here..
I would like to start my next career with some more realism.. I am working my way right now but at 61% realism.. I have external camera on, but only use it to see ships going down, or explore my own sub (never to cheat) But I also have auto targeting on, I still try my best to line my targets up properly, adjust the depth and fire away. sometimes aiming for the bow or the rear of the ship. I noticed a button for the weapons officer, to get a solution to the target.. Now, this is my question.. If I do not have auto target on, but weapons office assistant on, do I line up my shot and then click that button, and depending on his experience, he will do all the work for me (I assume the better he is the more accurate) ?? This will be for my next career and then after I will like to join the club of full manual.. THANKS GUYS! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
It's kind of a half-cheat. With Manual Targeting on, and WE Assistance on, you lock on to the target, then click his icon. Three new buttons pop up. Click the first one and he IDs the target. Click the second and he puts in all the information for you. Click the third and he takes the shot.
The good news is that it feels more real, since the solution is only good for that immediate moment, and quickly fades. The bad news is that he's just as accurate as auto targeting. Good news? No triangles. Bad news? The solution is instant and perfect, every time. The only advantage I get out of it is that it feels better than full auto. I wish SH4 had it, and I wish it wasn't so perfect.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Admirable Mike
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,338
Downloads: 421
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Guys...we spend so much time hunting targets that letting one get away seems criminal. I've missed too many. To heck with crew morale, mine is shot.
I now let the crew (realistically) figure out the solution and I watch the fireworks. I never was much good at math. ![]()
__________________
Game Designer: Close The Atlantic - World War Three https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/...orld-war-three |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ...somewhere in the swamps of Jersey.
Posts: 909
Downloads: 157
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
It would be nice to have something like that with the weapons officer assistance.
__________________
...I fought in many guises, many names, but always me. Patton
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Auburn, Alabama
Posts: 3,333
Downloads: 101
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I used to play with Weps assist, but that was too arcadey for my tastes, turned convoy attacks into turkey shoots
![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 786
Downloads: 254
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Did anyone possible make a Video tutorial for manual TDC control?
I have read some stuff, but like many I take to visuals much better.. I wouldn't mind giving it a try.. PS. THE TDC for the germans, was it the same as for the Americans? I remember watching a show on youtube (Silent Service, its great by the way) and they stated how great it was when the got the TDC and how hard it was to invent and the guy who invented it was a genius.. So.. How did the Germans get this? Was it better for the Americans or the Germans in terms of quality and technology .. Thanks guys ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Commander
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Just east of the west coast.
Posts: 463
Downloads: 423
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Then check out WernerSobe's excellent Basic and Advanced TDC/PK vids for a full, clear example of how to conduct a manual TDC attack. Quote:
The American one allowed the submarine to manoeuvre freely once the solution had been setup - and still maintain the solution (providing the target kept to its course and speed). In practice it required periodic updating (as it does in the game) to maintain an accurate solution over time. This was the "PK or Position Keeper". The German computer lacked this capability. In-game, the German targeting computer has the AOB and Bearing settings locked together (Not sure about real life). This makes targeting multiple ships in one attack an almost "point and shoot" technique if the target is a convoy (all ships-same speed and course) and the attack is of the "fast 90" variety (range not a factor). I also find it less unwieldy than the American TDC for quick snap-shots.
__________________
There are no great men, only great challenges that ordinary men are forced by circumstances to meet. -- Admiral William Halsey Last edited by Capt. Morgan; 09-11-10 at 04:25 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 795
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Aces of the Deep was auto targeting only, but not 100% foolproof. The longer you locked on, the better the solution, but you could still miss even with an "ideal" setup. The accuracy of targeting was also affected by crew experience.
How does SH5 handle it?
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|