SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-01-09, 04:32 AM   #1
ichso
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Germany's oldest city alive
Posts: 1,066
Downloads: 57
Uploads: 0
Default maximum range - speed setting

Hi,

does anyone noticed that the bigger fleet boat types (at least the sargos as far as I can tell) do get their maximum range when cruising at standard speed ?

I was used to travel at 2/3 in my S-class (and in SH3 in general) when I wanted to save fuel. Now in my new boat (sargo) the maximum range is achieved when sailing at standard instead. Which was about 10.000 nm when leaving port. When I set 2/3 (and wait for the speed to fully drop, of course) the maximum range is about 1000 nm below.

So, are those bigger boats really more fuel efficient when cruising faster, i.e. at standard ?
ichso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 04:58 AM   #2
Speedo
Bosun
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lithuania, Kaunas
Posts: 63
Downloads: 112
Uploads: 0
Default

All submarines ar god on standart speed, you can swim more range when on full or 1/3
Speedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 05:02 AM   #3
ichso
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Germany's oldest city alive
Posts: 1,066
Downloads: 57
Uploads: 0
Default

My old S-class had only a few thousand n.miles range at standard while it had about 16.000 miles range on 2/3.

My new sargo boat has a maximum range of only 10.000 nm at best, that's why I'm asking. Shouldn't it have more range than the tiny S-class ?
ichso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 05:04 AM   #4
Speedo
Bosun
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lithuania, Kaunas
Posts: 63
Downloads: 112
Uploads: 0
Default

Hmmm.. don't know, i allways using standart, and it's fine for me
Speedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 07:12 AM   #5
Rockin Robbins
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DeLand, FL
Posts: 8,900
Downloads: 135
Uploads: 52


Default

Max range is at about 9½ knots. Don't know how many miles that gets you. Sea state has a lot to do with that. And also if you're an ostrich you'll burn up twice as much fuel as us yo-yoers. Recharging batteries is brutal on range.
Rockin Robbins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 08:02 AM   #6
Fishie
Loader
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 82
Downloads: 16
Uploads: 0
Default

Are you running any mods like TMO or RFB?
__________________
One fish, two fish, three fish, BOOM!

Fishie, Commander SS-215
Fear the Growler!
Fishie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 08:52 AM   #7
ichso
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Germany's oldest city alive
Posts: 1,066
Downloads: 57
Uploads: 0
Default

RFB 1.52, yes.
ichso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 09:54 AM   #8
old_tex
Gunner
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 94
Downloads: 12
Uploads: 0
Default

Commissioned in February 1943, USS Balao carried 10 officers and 70 enlisted men in a hull 312 feet (95 m) long that displaced 2,415 tons submerged. Her armament included deck guns and 24 torpedoes. On the surface, powered by four diesel engines, the Balao had a top speed just over 20 knots (37 km/hr); cruising at 10 knots (18 km/hr) her range was 11,000 nautical miles (20,000 km). Two 126-cell battery groups gave her a submerged top speed of 8.75 knots (16.2 km/hr); holding her speed to 2 knots (4 km/hr), she could remain submerged for 48 hours.

Of course, "range" means cruising radius - 10,000 out and 10,000 back. It is important to get "back." Old_tex

Check out this link for Gato Class

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gato_class_submarine
old_tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 01:58 PM   #9
Stealhead
Navy Seal
 
Stealhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 5,421
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
Default

Well with any car,plane,ship that uses oil to power itself the range is very relative to many things. Of course the slower the rpms the better range but at the cost of ever getting there. For a sub youd would want to use the speed that gives the best of speed and the least fuel use or in TMO and RFB 9 to 10 knots. But you are never going to get the "max" range as things like charging batteries and using high speeds to set up post on a convoy are going to mean that you will never get the max range. But for me at least fuel has never been an issue so long as I run at TMO ahead standard the typical actions on a given patrol I often have 40% fuel left when I get back a little less if I was out of Pearl and had to travel to Luzon or something very far like that. Dont know about the range stats above for a Balao class I have seen places say a bit higher. But I have read that some time in 43' they began to fill one of the ballast tanks with fuel after some genius came up with a way to modify it and that all Gatos and Balaos at some point after this came about got this ballast tank mod which added some range to the subs. Safe to say that the Tenchs either where made with this ballast tank mod or they had more or larger full time fuel tanks.
http://www.fleetsubmarine.com/balao-class.html. The wiki data is most likely for a pre ballast/fuel tank mod Gato. In Take Her Deep the Hailabut had this weakness when she was in a 3 sub wolfpack the other 2 subs had the ballast tank mod she did not and had to leave a few days before the others to get home. It varied but the ballast/fuel tank mod easily added several days to a subs patrol time vs one that did not have it.

Last edited by Stealhead; 05-01-09 at 02:11 PM.
Stealhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 02:24 PM   #10
ichso
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Germany's oldest city alive
Posts: 1,066
Downloads: 57
Uploads: 0
Default

Thanks for the inputs.

But I think you are missing the point a bit. I was just wondering why an S-Class (in RFB or even in stock 1.5 as it seems) is able to increase it's range up to 16.000 nautical miles while the sargos, and probably the other fleet subs too, don't get much over 10.000 nm maximum, no matter what speed I use and also under good conditions.

I get everywhere faster but the maximum range I seem to be able to achieve is almost like 50% bigger in a small WWI-sub. This discrepancy seems odd.

And in SH4, if the maximum range reads 11000 nm, than it only means 11000 nm and not that you would have enough fuel to travel all the way back. After this distance your reserves will be depleted.
ichso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 03:44 PM   #11
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Short answer: they couldn't. The S-class had a range of 8000 nautical miles on a good day, and that was only the S-48 class. The rest were good for 5000 miles. The 16,000 miles you got in the game was total fantasy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...lass_submarine
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 04:37 PM   #12
ichso
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Germany's oldest city alive
Posts: 1,066
Downloads: 57
Uploads: 0
Default

Total fantasy of a developer or modder then, because the game sure said so and I ended a few patrols where I actually travelled almost that far.
ichso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 04:42 PM   #13
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Oh, I believe you. I'm just saying that the game has it totally wrong if that's the case, and that's why you're getting the wierd numbers.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 05:08 PM   #14
irish1958
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Carmel, Indiana
Posts: 3,250
Downloads: 320
Uploads: 11
Default Range

Were Subs ever refueled at sea from the task force oilers?
__________________
Irish1958
irish1958 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-09, 07:56 AM   #15
Torplexed
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
 
Torplexed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,823
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish1958 View Post
Were Subs ever refueled at sea from the task force oilers?
I've never come across a historical instance of this happening, but in an emergency I'm sure it could be done.
__________________

--Mobilis in Mobili--
Torplexed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.