![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
THis is a pretty good deal if you are in the market for a new vid card - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814130318
-S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
This might even be a better deal (faster GPU, but less RAM) 8800 GTS 320 MB - $114!!! - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814130082
-S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Estland
Posts: 4,330
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The GTS is not fasters than the GT by any margin, it has less stream processor units and its core is clocked lower. So no, it is not a faster GPU.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I see the GTS outperforming the GT here: http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/12/...mb/page11.html http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/12/...mb/page12.html Must be different revs of the board or something, but both Crysis and COD 4, the 512 MB GTS is beating the GT and these are the two most demanding games there is. -S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Found it - depends on which rev of the board you have (Way to confuse people NVidia!). One reve has 4 less shaders, but the G92 has 4 more shaders than the GT:
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/12/..._mb/page2.html -S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
thats the 512mb version, the 320mb version should be avoided
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Undetectable
![]() Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,221
Downloads: 132
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Why would the 8800 GTS 512mb consistantly perform way above a 8800 GTS 640mb.
They are both GTS cards but on those tests the one with more ram was thumped by the one with less ram. Edit Nevermind, you already answered it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
-S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Undetectable
![]() Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,221
Downloads: 132
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Where can I get the dimensions of these cards? I googled my arse off but had no luck. I have a fairly compact case.
Evga 8800 GT 512 Evga 8800 GTS 512 ......thanks in advance |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 622
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
err, how about EVGA's web site
http://www.evga.com/products/prodlis...+Series+Family If you click on a product, they have PDF's of each one, with dimensions included.
__________________
My Father's ship, HMCS Waskesiu (K330), sank U257 on 02/24/1944 ![]() running SHIII-1.4 with GWX2.1 and SHIV-1.5 with TMO/RSRDC/PE3.3 under MS Vista Home Premium 32-bit SP1 ACER AMD Athlon 64x2 4800+, 4GB DDR2 RAM, 400GB SATA HD Antec TruePower Trio 650watt PSU BFG GeForce 8800GT/OC 512MB VRAM, Samsung 216BW widescreen (1680x1050) LCD |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 4,224
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The 8800 GTS 320MB and the 8800 GT 512MB perform very similar, I have both. The GT is marginally better at f.i. low reolutions like 1280x1024, but performs noticably better at higher res and when AA and AF is enabled.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Undetectable
![]() Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,221
Downloads: 132
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Thanks Seafarer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|