![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Commander
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 459
Downloads: 31
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_...281939-1945%29
How much has anyone here contributed to the above? Just curious. And is there anything there which seems inaccurate (or is missing altogether)? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
I don't have time to read it all, but what I did see goes pretty well with the book I've been reading. Also, the list of sources seems pretty good. I would guess based on that alone that he's probably pretty close to the mark.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Docked on a Russian pond
Posts: 7,072
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I've read a good part of it and it seems accurate
__________________
Espionage, adventure, suspense, are just a click away Click here to look inside Brag's book: Amazon.com: Kingmaker: Alexey Braguine: Books Order Kingmaker here: http://www.subsim.com/store.html For Tactics visit:http://www.freewebs.com/kielman/ ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 1,691
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
On the accuracy of Wikipedia in General...
Wikipedia has a reputation for sometimes being innaccurate, this is true, but it's nothing to be greatly alarmed about. In an empirical study of wikipedia, and other print and sofware Encyclopedias, Wikipedia was found to have about the same number of errors as the commercial counterparts. Brittanica is no better than Wikipedia... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|