![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
PacWagon
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Drinking coffee and staring at trees in Massachusetts
Posts: 2,908
Downloads: 287
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
My girlfriend is doing foreign exchange in Finland (She's keeping a sharp eye out for the ferret-y types, tread carefully Dowly
![]() and she returned from a Rotary trip from St. Petersburg a couple weeks ago, she just uploaded the pictures (being somewhat of a russophile, I asked her to take pictures of anything I might find interesting) and she came across this ship... ![]() ![]() ![]() All I can tell is is that it was made post-1977 (I only have two books that list all of the known ships in the soviet navy and this isn't one of them) I know the numbers they paint on the hull aren't the identification numbers like we do here in the USA. I think it's some kind of tender or amphibious support ship. I did a WHOLE lot of research before it struck me that I'm a SUBSIM.com member. Anyone want to venture a guess? ![]()
__________________
Cold Waters Voice Crew - Fire Control Officer Cmdr O. Myers - C/O USS Nautilus (SS-168) 114,000 tons sunk - 4 Spec Ops completed V-boat Nutcase - Need supplies? Japanese garrison on a small island in the way? Just give us a call! D4C! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
Not a US destroyer.
937 would be a Forest Sherman Class. Single 5" mounts. One forward and two aft. Who in the world else has big hull numbers like that? |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
PacWagon
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Drinking coffee and staring at trees in Massachusetts
Posts: 2,908
Downloads: 287
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
the russians, apparently
![]() but they never match up with the actual class numbers, K-19 had 294 painted on her tower. it doesn't make any sense to me, and I'm not going to ask any of my friends here, they aren't narly as into this kinda stuff as I am.
__________________
Cold Waters Voice Crew - Fire Control Officer Cmdr O. Myers - C/O USS Nautilus (SS-168) 114,000 tons sunk - 4 Spec Ops completed V-boat Nutcase - Need supplies? Japanese garrison on a small island in the way? Just give us a call! D4C! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
Can't find anything, no matter how I google it.
Best bet is a library. Janes Fighting Ships. I tryed googling my way in there, but was unsuccessful. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
The arabic on the bridge gave it away. She is a long way from home.
![]() She is an Algerian training ship Atakor. Built in the PRC as the Type 50A class. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
PacWagon
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Drinking coffee and staring at trees in Massachusetts
Posts: 2,908
Downloads: 287
Uploads: 0
|
![]() ![]() but that's a Russian flag flying from the forward antenna mast?! Perhaps the Russians made a recent purchase?
__________________
Cold Waters Voice Crew - Fire Control Officer Cmdr O. Myers - C/O USS Nautilus (SS-168) 114,000 tons sunk - 4 Spec Ops completed V-boat Nutcase - Need supplies? Japanese garrison on a small island in the way? Just give us a call! D4C! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Nautical_Signal_Flags Looks like the crew was having lunch. *nom* *nom* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interna...ICS_meaning.29 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
PacWagon
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Drinking coffee and staring at trees in Massachusetts
Posts: 2,908
Downloads: 287
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
you have me convinced TLAM!
![]() (I can't remember the stripe arrangement on the Russian national flag, I thought that if white was on top it was blending in with the sky)
__________________
Cold Waters Voice Crew - Fire Control Officer Cmdr O. Myers - C/O USS Nautilus (SS-168) 114,000 tons sunk - 4 Spec Ops completed V-boat Nutcase - Need supplies? Japanese garrison on a small island in the way? Just give us a call! D4C! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() Certainly saved me a bit of research work...and still may have got it wrong ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|