![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Bosun
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 62
Downloads: 30
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I must be part of that 1% then....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lux, betw. G, B and F
Posts: 1,898
Downloads: 66
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
His post makes me wonder too. Neal, i am ranting, in your Virtual Saloon that Suibsim is, so please let me offer you a beer, as i cannot dso more for you than tell you that i appreciate the fact thet YOU enable ME to Voice my Opinion. *beer* Back to the Question... I do not know. and little do i care. I am dissapointed, and have no more interest in the Future of the Silent hunter series. >maybe it ll come back in a few years. Gimme GWX or LSHIII...
__________________
In conclusion: SH3 is the shizzle, yo. -Frau Kaleun Another negative about using your deck gun is that you are definately DETECTED, which has long term effects on your relationship with aircraft. -snestorm |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
Born to Run Silent
|
![]()
Wow, lot's of great posts, I'm gonna give that new multi-quote feature a stress test here
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Thanks for the beer, mate, and the wildness of these pre-release discussions is traditonal. If you remember before SH2, it was totally crazy! ![]()
__________________
SUBSIM - 26 Years on the Web |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lux, betw. G, B and F
Posts: 1,898
Downloads: 66
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Neal, i only came aboard after SHIII...
This place, as a Online Lounge to chill out on, speak aboutt my Sub simming dreams, is a difficult place atm, but none the less appreciated.
__________________
In conclusion: SH3 is the shizzle, yo. -Frau Kaleun Another negative about using your deck gun is that you are definately DETECTED, which has long term effects on your relationship with aircraft. -snestorm |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Not my call, but PM sent.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
So what happens down the pipe if UBISoft is sold?
One would think that any new owners would also own the rights to UBISoft's stable but would not stand to generate any income from the SH5 server without resorting to new fees. It's unlikely that there would be a continued requirement to support a "legacy" product. UBISoft states that they will issue some sort of patch but if sold they might not have the legal right to do so as the game(s) may no longer belong to them. I think this, more than any transient connection problems, represents the biggest issue with the always must be on-line DRM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,243
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 8
|
![]()
What's next?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,404
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 1
|
![]()
I hope not. It's already depressing enough around here what with all the ranting and raving.
__________________
They don’t think it be like it is, but it do. Want more U-boat Kaleun portraits for your SH3 Commander Profiles? Download the SH3 Commander Portrait Pack here. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Chief
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: France
Posts: 313
Downloads: 152
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I would have bought the game even with only one sub (hoping that a following expansion pack would add the type IX and perhaps 1/2 years to go until 1943).
I'm going back to SH3+GWX which I'll combine with my current SH4. I will wait for a DRM-free version, if it ever happens (when the game is out since a long time, having it protected is of no use.. So I hope they will remove the DRM and online-stuff with the last patch for example). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Commander
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 452
Downloads: 134
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Medic
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 164
Downloads: 7
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Well, let's stop talking so much bloody rubbish, right? They talk about a "dynamic campaign" that responds to the player's actions... and they do so while highlighting the battle for malta. Now as memory serves, the british dispatch some carriers to ferry some land based front-line aircraft to bolster Malta's defenders. Those carriers and the aircraft end up scaring the Italians into staying in port. I'd wonder if the dynamic campaign wouldn't present the possibilty of a player success against the carriers causing the Italians to sortie against the reinforcement task forces and the island garrison. Maybe it would allow the Luftwaffe to gain aerial superiority which would change the Med battlefield tremendously.
__________________
C.O. - USS Tambor "Defending that which is sincerely good and perfectly divine; Triumphant over death, and chance, and time..." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Born to Run Silent
|
![]()
Excuse me?
__________________
SUBSIM - 26 Years on the Web |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
ps - i think he meant UBI not you |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Born to Run Silent
|
![]()
Ok, sounds good.
![]()
__________________
SUBSIM - 26 Years on the Web |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|