[REL] sh4speech - voice command for SH4

[minsc_tdp]

I'll check on all those weird IDs you mention. I haven't noticed any slowdown or bad recs due to the additional commmands. It's really not that many, even though it looks huge, a lot of them are really just the same command said with 360 different minor variations. As long as the gist of that command is sufficiently different from all others, there's no chance of a bad recognition.

The worst I've seen it do is hear "nine" instead of "nineteen" or "ninety" which is a good case for slimming down the set.

But I like the precise control. When you're changing your speed to match a ship, or rotating AOB or changing target speed, you'll want that. Maybe not for depth control but, who knows.

UPDATE: 55 and 572 do different things - one goes to damage station and the other tells the damage control team to get in gear, I'm pretty sure those are totally different.

558 is send range to TDC, but the other two are 558.1 (Follow Warship) and 558.2 (Normal Sweep).

[panthercules]

Originally Posted by minsc_tdp

But I like the precise control. When you're changing your speed to match a ship, or rotating AOB or changing target speed, you'll want that. Maybe not for depth control but, who knows.

Yeah - I like it for speed/AOB as you say, and for course too (since there's no good way yet to order "set course for xx degrees", you need the precision to get to the exact course you want). It just didn't seem quite right to me for depth and rudder (couldn't see myself ordering "right 13 degrees rudder" either - so I just use 5 degree increments there as well) - purely a personal taste thing.

Originally Posted by minsc_tdp

UPDATE: 55 and 572 do different things - one goes to damage station and the other tells the damage control team to get in gear, I'm pretty sure those are totally different.

558 is send range to TDC, but the other two are 558.1 (Follow Warship) and 558.2 (Normal Sweep).

LOL - well, I knew it was getting late and I was getting tired - turns out I was looking at the old and new files tiled vertically next to each other, so I had squeezed down the ID column widths to where I couldn't see the decimal places, so they all looked like 558 to me - sorry for the false alarm

[minsc_tdp]

btw i just adjusted the torp depth from a max of 30 to 50 (will be part of 2.0 final), so watch out for that on your next merge... sorry for making that so difficult on ya by changing stuff so much. I also deleted kept the decoy command #17 but deleted #507 since keys are preferred

you should get a utility like BeyondCompare which can intelligently show the differences between these files. would be of immense help when you have a lot of customizations

[Digital_Trucker]

I guess I'm the only person with the problem (or everyone else using the compiled version is running at 1024x768), but I can't get it to recognize my resolution. I tried making the change in the batch file and I've even gone so far as to attempt to recompile voice.pl with the resolution change (not having much luck there, gonna try some more today).

Any thoughts on why it wouldn't work by making the change in the batch file?

[Anti_Ship_Fella]

well sounds great but i dont have a microphone

[minsc_tdp]

Originally Posted by Anti_Ship_Fella

well sounds great but i dont have a microphone

You know, I tested this on a laptop the other day that has a built-in mic. That mic sucks SO bad but yet it recognized great with this. You could probably pick up a simple desktop mic for less than $10.

Here you go, a whole bunch for less than $1

If you want to spend some money, I'm using this monster

[AVGWarhawk]

Install.........easy!
Voice recognition...........good!
Voice got confused response............sometimes.
Wife thinks I'm nuts talking to the computer......not uncommon for me to do so who cares?


Does the voice recognition get better over time? Reason I ask, I say bridge and it takes me there and then the binocs come up.

Other than that, a really neat program. Do not touch the keyboard but for very few things. The best part.....YOU FEEL LIKE YOU ARE SKIPPERING THE BOAT!!!! It is really cool. You say a command and you get a response of "Yes sir". Now, just to get it to recognize my command all the time and you got a winner here.

[minsc_tdp]

Originally Posted by Digital_Trucker

I guess I'm the only person with the problem (or everyone else using the compiled version is running at 1024x768), but I can't get it to recognize my resolution. I tried making the change in the batch file and I've even gone so far as to attempt to recompile voice.pl with the resolution change (not having much luck there, gonna try some more today).

Any thoughts on why it wouldn't work by making the change in the batch file?

Whoops, sorry about that DT! That was a minor brain fart on my part in the code. I've updated it and posted it as 2.01.

[Digital_Trucker]

Originally Posted by minsc_tdp

Whoops, sorry about that DT! That was a minor brain fart on my part in the code. I've updated it and posted it as 2.01.

Hey, no problem dude! Thanks for the quick fix. As for the brain farts, my motto has always been "If you don't have an occasional brain fart, then you must not have a brain"