SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-02-07, 11:29 PM   #16
CCIP
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Canada
Posts: 8,700
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 2


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bort
The interesting thing is that the Bismarck didn't really have a true allied counterpart. Bismarck was designed to operate independently as a commerce raider, unlike the Allied battlewagons which were meant to operate as part of a battle group or line with cruisers and escorts, engaging similar enemy groups. In that sense, Bismarck and Tirpitz have no true peers.
Yea, good point!

I think it's pretty fair to safe that it wasn't a "ship of the line" per se, just a massively powerful commerce raider. She was a pretty impressive design though.


Now, on the subject of big BBs...

I think this page is very relevant:
http://www.combinedfleet.com/baddest.htm

(a detailed comparison of the world's most powerful BBs, which actually puts the Iowas at the top)
__________________

There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers.
-Don Van Vliet
(aka Captain Beefheart)
CCIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-07, 01:00 AM   #17
Bort
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Studying in Atlanta
Posts: 919
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
I think it's pretty fair to safe that it wasn't a "ship of the line" per se, just a massively powerful commerce raider. She was a pretty impressive design though.
No doubt about that! She went toe to toe with some of Britain's best ships and held her own for an astonishing amount of time, all alone with no assistance.
__________________

GT Aerospace
Bort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-07, 02:29 AM   #18
Torplexed
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
 
Torplexed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,823
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0


Default

Before we sing the Bismarck's merits too highly let's not forget this mighty mountain of steel was disabled and rendered unsteerable by one torpedo from an obsolete slow-moving biplane. Such vulnerability to aircraft pretty much ended the period of German warships acting as surface raiders
__________________

--Mobilis in Mobili--
Torplexed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-07, 02:39 AM   #19
Bort
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Studying in Atlanta
Posts: 919
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Torplexed
Before we sing the Bismarck's merits too highly let's not forget this mighty mountain of steel was disabled and rendered unsteerable by one torpedo from an obsolete slow-moving biplane. Such vulnerability to aircraft pretty much ended the period of German warships acting as surface raiders
Point well taken! The Axis powers would have been well advised to create better counter-biplane technologies and tactics. Who would've thunk it?
__________________

GT Aerospace
Bort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-07, 06:55 AM   #20
Penelope_Grey
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,893
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Yeah well, sing the Bismark's praises, it took out the hood with just 3 shots! And it took over 700 shells before it went down, and, even then there is an historical debate that could go back and forth forever as to was it sunk, or scuttled?

Its funny about the Swordfish plane, but the Germans were not expecting that to be used, the Bismark's AA guns were designed to hit faster moving planes.
__________________

I SURVIVED THE FIRST EVER SUBSIM WEREWOLF HUNT - and... I actually won the game for the humans too!
Penelope_Grey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-07, 08:51 AM   #21
STEED
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Down Town UK
Posts: 27,695
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 48


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Penelope_Grey
Yeah well, sing the Bismark's praises, it took out the hood with just 3 shots! And it took over 700 shells before it went down, and, even then there is an historical debate that could go back and forth forever as to was it sunk, or scuttled?

Its funny about the Swordfish plane, but the Germans were not expecting that to be used, the Bismark's AA guns were designed to hit faster moving planes.
Three reasons why H.M.S HOOD went down
1st she was old
2nd The Hood's stern was not refitted with deck armour unlike her bow was, too protect against plunging shells
3rd The Bismark used AP shells

The result of this was one lucky shot by Bismark landed in the stern of the Hood and penetrated her down to her magazines which marked her end.

If Hood had those upgrades, she may have survived but would had been forced to break off her attack.

And now meet the man who changed the battle.

Pilot reunited with old war plane
__________________
Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017.

To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT!

Last edited by STEED; 03-03-07 at 09:15 AM.
STEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-07, 09:07 AM   #22
bigboywooly
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Swindon, England
Posts: 10,151
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
Default

Yeah the poor ole Hood
Built in the day guns couldnt fire as far so only needed massive belt armour
As gun ranges increased the shells would rain down onto the deck rather than hitting the side armour
God only knows why they didnt increase the stern deck at the same time as the fore decks

From all the stuff I have read and seen the Hood was only minutes away from safety
The point where the shells would have such a trajectory they would hit the sides not the decking
Alas not to be
__________________


My mediafire page http://www.mediafire.com/?11eoq19bq9r41
bigboywooly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-07, 05:42 PM   #23
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bort
The interesting thing is that the Bismarck didn't really have a true allied counterpart. Bismarck was designed to operate independently as a commerce raider, unlike the Allied battlewagons which were meant to operate as part of a battle group or line with cruisers and escorts, engaging similar enemy groups. In that sense, Bismarck and Tirpitz have no true peers.
The Queen Elizabeth class is the most like the Bismarck in layout and appearance, as well gunn and number side. The Bismarck had the advantage in that she was a more modern build so more experience from WW1 went into her construction as well as new advances that had appeared since then.

The Bismarck layout was based on the WW1 Battleship Bayen. The design showed how good it was taking damage through the expereinces of the Bismarck and Tirpitz.
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.