SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Large Battleships (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=106697)

Penelope_Grey 03-02-07 04:04 PM

Large Battleships
 
Guys, what was the immediate Allied counterpart to the Bismark, was there a battleship on the allied side which was of similar or equal size to the bismark?

Oberon 03-02-07 04:25 PM

Hmmmmmm

Well, the Renown (otherwise known as the 'Refit' and 'Repair') class was about the same dimensions (within a few meters) but the Hood beat them...


Buuuut...I reckon the KGV class would probably have been the better comparison...even though the Prince of Wales didn't fare so well against the Bismarck (although to be fair, she was just out of dock and with a few technical hitches and civilian specialists still on board.) they certainly seem to be the premier warship of the era (despite Hoods status as the ship of the fleet).

So....I'm going for the King George V class.

Although, TBH, by the time the Bismarck reached her end, the era of the Carrier was well under way (as the Swordfish torpedo bomber crews from the Victorious and the Ark Royal that attacked the Bismarck would agree with....erm...well...primarily the ones from the Ark Royal...the ones from Victorious were too busy swimming back to the carrier after running out of fuel...) and the big gun battleship was under threat from the sky.

Penelope_Grey 03-02-07 04:34 PM

thanks Oberon, I did wonder about the King George V, but was not 100% certain, I do know the Yamoto was the largest ever that was in excess of 75,000 tons!

Oberon 03-02-07 04:46 PM

Yeah, she sure was a beast (Bigger than the proposed Montana class which the US never built)...but at the end of the day, ushered out by the aircraft.

Penelope_Grey 03-02-07 04:58 PM

the Aircraft carrier was to be the new chief weapon for sure! :)

STEED 03-02-07 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Penelope_Grey
the Aircraft carrier was to be the new chief weapon for sure! :)

Indeed the Japanese showed the world what they could do at Pearl Harbour and America showed the world there weakness as they hit back at Midway.

bigboywooly 03-02-07 06:02 PM

IIRC it was the British attack on Taranto which helped convince the Japanese Pearl could work

JSLTIGER 03-02-07 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon
Yeah, [Yamato] was a beast (Bigger than the proposed Montana class which the US never built)...but at the end of the day, ushered out by the aircraft.

True enough that Yamato would have been bigger in total tonnage, but Montana would have had 12 16"/50 calibre guns with a heavier overall broadside than Yamato's 9 18.1"/45 calibre guns. However, certainly no argument about the aircraft.

Torplexed 03-02-07 09:37 PM

The Japanese converted the last Yamato class battleship, the Shinano into a carrier while still in the stocks. In retrospect they probably wished they could have poured all that steel into carrier hulls.

JSLTIGER 03-02-07 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Torplexed
The Japanese converted the last Yamato class battleship, the Shinano into a carrier while still in the stocks. In retrospect they probably wished they could have poured all that steel into carrier hulls.

True. However, if you'll remember, Shinano was sunk by a torpedo attack with four hits from USS Archer-Fish before she was even properly fitted out. Therefore, she offered no benefit to the Japanese, who put a lot of resources into her construction.

Torplexed 03-02-07 09:46 PM

Yeah...she sank without even ever launching a plane. That must have stung. And she was the largest carrier ever built until the USN's Forrestal class of the 1950s.

GSpector 03-02-07 10:25 PM

As for Aircraft Carriers, I with the Yorktown Class was in SH4. Especially my Favorite. The CV 6, Enterprise.

Mush Martin 03-02-07 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Torplexed
The Japanese converted the last Yamato class battleship, the Shinano into a carrier while still in the stocks. In retrospect they probably wished they could have poured all that steel into carrier hulls.

or DE hulls. and tankers.

Bort 03-02-07 11:19 PM

The interesting thing is that the Bismarck didn't really have a true allied counterpart. Bismarck was designed to operate independently as a commerce raider, unlike the Allied battlewagons which were meant to operate as part of a battle group or line with cruisers and escorts, engaging similar enemy groups. In that sense, Bismarck and Tirpitz have no true peers.

Torplexed 03-02-07 11:29 PM

Actually the Germans had every intention in the 1930s of building a balanced battlefleet starting with the Bismarck. There were eventually to have been six. However submarine construction took priority and Bismarck and her sister ship Tirpitz had to be pressed into the only use available as they were so few. Commerce raiders.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.