What would be your reaction if ......

CCIP · 06-01-06, 06:56 PM

No reaction whatsoever. I don't do multiplayer

CWorth · 06-01-06, 10:29 PM

I had to vote..."Good, now the dev's have more time to code single play"

Only because I have no interest in multiplay in these games..Single play is where it is at.

06-02-06, 11:21 AM

Co-op doesn't interest me in the least, and since actual versus play is almost certainly not going to happen, I'd prefer them to concentrate on getting the game right.

STEED · 06-02-06, 03:13 PM

My vote went for Good, now the dev's have more time to code single play

goldorak · 06-02-06, 04:36 PM

No multiplayer = no sale.

Seriously if an 8 year old software such as falcon 4 can deliver dynamic single player missions (campaign) and multiplayer dynamic campaign there is absolutely no reason whatsoever for developers not including such a feature in sh iv.

Kapitan_Phillips · 06-02-06, 06:55 PM

To be fair though, SH3 had its fair share of multiplayer problems. Playing behind a router? Good luck.

Make a good single player game and I'll be a happy little Englander. Besides, there are still clans and the like that'll no doubt pop up, like Sturmgruppewulf I think for SH3. But yeah, my votes with the "no big deal" MP would be nice, but its not essential.

Torplexed · 06-02-06, 10:08 PM

It's Solitaire for me too.

View Poll Results: SHIV would be released with out online multiplay ?
What ?? I will NOT buy a SHIV without online multiplay	12	9.60%
This is terrible, but will still buy SHIV	9	7.20%
Too bad, but no big deal	28	22.40%
I don't care at all	17	13.60%
Good, now the dev's have more time to code single play	59	47.20%
Voters: 125. You may not vote on this poll

06-01-06, 06:56 PM	#1
CCIP Navy Seal Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Waterloo, Canada Posts: 8,700 Downloads: 29 Uploads: 2	No reaction whatsoever. I don't do multiplayer __________________ There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers. -Don Van Vliet (aka Captain Beefheart)

06-02-06, 03:13 PM	#4
STEED Lucky Jack Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Down Town UK Posts: 27,695 Downloads: 89 Uploads: 48	My vote went for Good, now the dev's have more time to code single play __________________ Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT!

06-02-06, 06:55 PM	#6
Kapitan_Phillips Silent Hunter Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Swansea Posts: 3,903 Downloads: 204 Uploads: 0	To be fair though, SH3 had its fair share of multiplayer problems. Playing behind a router? Good luck. Make a good single player game and I'll be a happy little Englander. Besides, there are still clans and the like that'll no doubt pop up, like Sturmgruppewulf I think for SH3. But yeah, my votes with the "no big deal" MP would be nice, but its not essential. __________________ Well, here's another nice mess you've gotten me into.

06-02-06, 10:08 PM	#7
Torplexed Let's Sink Sumptin' ! Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 5,823 Downloads: 43 Uploads: 0	It's Solitaire for me too. __________________ --Mobilis in Mobili-- Last edited by Torplexed; 06-02-06 at 10:11 PM.

06-01-06, 10:29 PM	#2
CWorth Grey Wolf Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Gettysburg PA Posts: 845 Downloads: 38 Uploads: 0	I had to vote..."Good, now the dev's have more time to code single play" Only because I have no interest in multiplay in these games..Single play is where it is at.

06-02-06, 11:21 AM	#3
Sailor Steve Stowaway Posts: n/a Downloads: Uploads:	Co-op doesn't interest me in the least, and since actual versus play is almost certainly not going to happen, I'd prefer them to concentrate on getting the game right.

06-02-06, 04:36 PM	#5
goldorak Admiral Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,320 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	No multiplayer = no sale. Seriously if an 8 year old software such as falcon 4 can deliver dynamic single player missions (campaign) and multiplayer dynamic campaign there is absolutely no reason whatsoever for developers not including such a feature in sh iv.