![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#5 | |
Torpedoman
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 112
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 2
|
![]() Quote:
Neutral vessels would stay the hell away from warships (warned off as required), and constantly broadcast their neutrality to avoid being accidentally sunk. So it'd behoove them to have both sides aware of their position at all times. Friendly units, you'd know where they are at all times, like you do the P-3 Orions and NATO satellites, but you wouldn't come anywhere near them to prevent friendly fire incidents. A submarine's job is to remain hidden, unknown and alone most of the time. So, in practical terms, you would never find friendlies and neutrals within the same mission area as hostiles. And outside, you wouldn't have any interactions with them due to your job (and would never confuse them with enemies due to strategic intel), so at best blue and green icons would only clutter the strategic map. That kind of target identification gameplay is better suited to Harpoon-esque flashpoint scenarios, in which you might be carrying out operations in relatively small areas where non-combatants might be puttering about doing their thing. But a World War is very much not business as usual. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I don't know much about the doctrines which would kick in during this kind of high-intensity conflict, but from the logical standpoint I can't see how surface groups wouldn't have ample exclusion zones around them, preventing non-mission (neutral/friendly) units from wandering in, in Cold Waters' context.
__________________
![]() = Longer Campaigns: Marathon Edition = 500-yard MAD range |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|