![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
CINC Pacific Fleet
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Down Under
Posts: 34,721
Downloads: 171
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Only God knows that date!!
![]()
__________________
Sub captains go down with their ship! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Wayfaring Stranger
|
![]()
I think it's a pretty safe bet that none of us will live to see the end of either the earth or the human race.
__________________
![]() Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Lucky Sailor
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rome
Posts: 4,273
Downloads: 81
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
End of the Human Race is another matter. The right idiot in control of a nuclear arsenal has a decent shot of wiping us out, but probably not completely. But most likely, if we do see a species ending event, it will be from some pandemic that we can't stop. Or again, from an impactor from space. But yet, it's kinda weird that one of the biggest natural disasters we could ever face, an impact from an asteroid or the like, is the only natural disaster we can both predict with adequate lead time and we can prevent, that we aren't spending more effort to protect ourselves. https://b612foundation.org/ ftw |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
Earth’s Next Major Extinction Event Has Already Started
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entr...-1207021200_uk Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
I know. Let's pick 27,000 species out the millions of species on earth. We'll pick them arbitrarily to ensure bias, make grand assumptions about past extinction rates, as if we knew at any given time how many species exist (heck, we can't even agree on what a species IS!!) and then make a prediction of doom. Shades of 1950s science fiction movies, but for a lot more money.
Doom sells. What people buy we will get more of. People are absolute SUCKERS for predictions of doom, especially THEIR doom. Watch for more more and darker doom scenarios, invented from whole cloth, sold to you by news media which has lost its compass and doesn't know what news is any more.
__________________
Sub Skipper's Bag of Tricks, Slightly Subnuclear Mk 14 & Cutie, Slightly Subnuclear Deck Gun, EZPlot 2.0, TMOPlot, TMOKeys, SH4CMS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]() ![]()
__________________
Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. ![]() To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
In the Brig
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Willing Webfooted Beast
|
![]() Quote:
Still, given that we're the only animals on the planet who are aware that we're causing an extinction event, I doubt we'll reach Permian levels (95% of all life destroyed). By the way, Dinosaurs aren't extinct. You see them every day.
__________________
Historical TWoS Gameplay Guide: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=2572620 Historical FotRSU Gameplay Guide: https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/sho....php?p=2713394 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
Yes I know dinosaurs aren't extinct, I had a leg of one last night.
![]() Quote:
If that article above is true then we're not talking about one or two species over centuries but hundreds of them, I'm sure that would count as a local mass extinction. Add in the lost species from every other country and we've got a global mass extinction on our hands and its the "greed is good" culture that's driving them to extinction. As always we've got the climate and extinction deniers who are listened to more because they have the loudest voices, its not because they are right that they are so vocal its because they have more to lose than any one else, you only have to look at the Brazilian rain forest destruction to see this greed culture in full swing.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Quebec City
Posts: 1,153
Downloads: 258
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Personally I'm pretty glad that my ancestors were in no position to have that kind of reasoning... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Dipped Squirrel Operative
|
![]()
Earth has a disease called "Homo sapiens".
But as Mars recently said: "Don't worry, you'll get over it." We are meanwhile nearing a CO level that has only existed once in earth's time, at the end of the Permian, to Triassic. The ecosystem took around 30 million years to recover back then. While we argue whether mankind has something to do with the current rise of CO levels or not, and telling those damned tree huggers to bugger off, the inanimate rocky ball of earth itself will not have a problem. That species become extinct also happens without mankind helping, however the scope of plain killing high numbers of animals of all kinds done by mankind (not yet call it extinction, we might still find one or two bornean rhinoceroses somewhere, just not in numbers able to replicate in the future) has become enormous, which is especially true for insects in civilized countries. It is not only companies like Monsanto, but generally insecticides and defoliage chemicals used e.g. for potato crop has killed so many bees in Germany that we have to import them just to balance the fertilization of agricultural crop. Regarding global warming and rising CO levels, or all those methanhydrate craters going off recently: whether it is human influence or the sun letting off more energy – you'd suppose maybe at least thinking a bit about it and planning, would be in order? Obviously not. Earlier this year, the White House proposed slashing funding for the Science Advisory Board by 84 percent. It is not only the US of course, if you look at Russia, or China. Germany is not better, it just isn't big enough to have so much impact. But "we" also have no specialists anymore, all leaving or we just let the technology drop off, like e.g. with seismography. We invented it, made it high tech, and then we just let it being bought off or dropped it altogether. Putting our heads in the sand and call it all fake news will of course solve the problem. Scientists are all leftist donkeyholes, standing in the way of commerce and financial progress anyway ![]() ![]() Seriously coming back to the op, earth's end as a rocky agglomeration of minerals will come when the sun develops into its red giant phase, most probably earth will then just have its atmosphere blown off, melt, and become a gas to be dispersed in space.
__________________
>^..^<*)))>{ All generalizations are wrong. Last edited by Catfish; 07-14-17 at 02:55 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
I, for one, am confident the world will not end before 31 January 2026. My belief is based on the date of the expiration of my Senior Citizen transit pass; when I got my first pass a few years ago, it was only valid for a year, which I took as a bad omen of their consideration of my longevity; the second pass was valid for an additional two years and I was grateful for their revised projection; now, the last renewal was for ten years, all the way til 1/31/2026, signifying the transit agency, a governmental entity, has high hopes for my continued existence; I look forward to seeing if they will deign to give me a further 'thumbs up' in 2026...
...then, again, I could be run over by one of their buses or hit by one of their trains... <O>
__________________
__________________________________________________ __ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Lucky Sailor
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rome
Posts: 4,273
Downloads: 81
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
As I mentioned, short of a pandemic or impact, the human race will continue on for a very long time. As to how well we do, that's another question. I understand where the science deniers are coming from, and knowing the sources of the misinformation are understandable. But since I'm on a rant, I have to ask why the impetus is there for the average citizen to not want to protect the planet? It's a known fact, even from the oil companies, that petroleum access as we know it will run out by the end of the century. There will probably always be oil, but just getting to it will make it very very expensive. Making an effort to wean ourselves off oil as much as possible now is the only solution for the long term success of society. And then, why wouldn't anybody want to leave the planet in better shape than it is now? Why not try to give future generations a better life? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
CINC Pacific Fleet
![]() |
![]()
if one believes in the almighty then this will be convinced God will come to our rescue and take over the steering wheels before we completely drive over the edge
While some believe in a thing called Gaia that Earth is a living organisme and thinking ditto. Will God take control and let some part of the human live on or Will this Gaia erase the human kind from her organisme or let some of the human get a second chance to improve That was about the Human Earth: Will, if Bible is wrong in some way, God let Earth be destroyed or give it another chance with other living things than human or will Human still be his choice ? Markus |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|