![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#76 |
Soaring
|
![]()
I assume that jumping chute-less into a net was just the first step, and the new trend will go from jumping down and onto a trampolin and then gaining altitude and re-board a hovering helicopter.
Okay, maybe better not a helicopter, just in case the upmove overshoots. Needs to be a plane, too, apparently. Maybe SAM warning devices on military jets can be tuned to warn against upcoming parachuters, too.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
![]() |
![]() |
#77 |
Wayfaring Stranger
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#78 | |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#79 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
By the way, this is the net used. Look at the size. The dimensions.
Man, I can't wait until the military will use this to drop airborne brigades - but after all, I don't know what is possible or not -> only August does! ![]() ![]() Last edited by Nippelspanner; 08-01-16 at 12:36 PM. |
![]() |
#80 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
^ Yup, that's the problem. If you can get all the needed equipment in there in preparation for the paras, then you could just as well drive the paras there in the first place.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#81 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
You are disturbing the infantile fantasies and feelings of some people, that is not allowed, you don't know what is possible or not! Thank you! |
|
![]() |
#82 |
Wayfaring Stranger
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() |
![]() |
#84 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
They wont drop troops in nets. Thats stupid.
But they will use the technology the guy used to slow his descent so he survived the sudden deceleration in hitting the net, to enable paratroopers to deploy chutes a lot later making them clay pigeons for a lot shorter time. Not to mention the tech and know how of hitting that net from that altitude will enable more accurate drops. God, you're all fixated on that net like me on redheads. |
![]() |
![]() |
#85 |
Wayfaring Stranger
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 |
Wayfaring Stranger
|
![]() Of course they did, just like those who took a look at the Wright Brothers plane and declared that it would never be suitable for trans-atlantic travel, or Bells telephone declaring it would never replace the telegraph. And yes getting to the ground without a parachute does have potential military applications. |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#88 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
To end up like you?
No, thanks. ![]() @Betonov Nothing the guy did helped in any way or made anything clearer. Of course one can jump into a net from whatever height - just no one did it before for rather obvious reasons. Explain to me what we know now that we didn't know before, please? ![]() And again, combat jumps aren't conducted anymore. No air superiority -> no airborne operations. Well then why not just land or drop them via plane/parachute?! |
![]() |
#89 | ||
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Maybe not for me. But maybe smart people are going trough any data he might have produced. Quote:
The longer the soldier manages not to open the chute, the longer he is a veeeeeeeery hard target to hit and track. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#90 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|