SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-16, 03:15 PM   #1
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
Sad loss, but I do have one complaint against the reporting, and that is the use of the word "ace". There is only one circumstance for that term to be used for a pilot, and that is when he has shot down five or more of his enemies. This is not meant to slight Major Al-Obedi, who by all reports was a great pilot, but did he fulfill the requirement for that term?

It's like when reporters call a destroyer a "battleship". It happens a lot, but it doesn't make it so.
Good point, fair point too. Do ground targets count towards attaining ace status though? And, whilst I was doing a quick bit of research into the definition of an ace, wikipedia made a fair point, how many more Aces will there been in future wars? Since fighter vs fighter combat is becoming less frequent in modern warfare and unmanned aircraft are becoming more common, we could be looking at the end of the era of Aces.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-16, 05:37 AM   #2
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,615
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Blue Skies
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-16, 07:24 AM   #3
Commander Wallace
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Under the sea in an Octupus garden in the shade
Posts: 5,307
Downloads: 366
Uploads: 0


Default

From the images, it appears to be a MiG-23 as you mentioned. Wilkipedia suggests the MiG-23 was a fighter / interceptor/ and attack bomber or strike aircraft.

" quote "


Operational history

Western sources, generally attribute a very limited number of confirmed air-to-air victories to the MiG-23 while reporting a higher number of MiG-23s downed mostly by Israeli Air Force in 1982, while Russian sources generally decrease the number of losses and increase the number of inflicted kills bringing the air-to-air kill to loss ratio to around parity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-23


Wilkipedia also suggests that a pilot with 5 or more " kills " is sufficient for attaining the status of " ace "


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_ace


This is not meant to be a denigration of his flying abilities.



A better example of an ace might have been German pilot Erich Hartmann who is the top ace of all time with 352 kills.

The Soviet Air Forces has the first Allied pilots in terms of aerial victories, Ivan Kozhedub credited with 66 victories and Alexander Pokryshkin scored 65 victories. It also claimed the only female aces of the war: Lydia Litvyak scored 12 victories and Yekaterina Budanova achieved 11 Fighting on different sides, the French pilot Pierre Le Gloan had the unusual distinction of shooting down four German, seven Italian and seven British aircraft, the latter while he was flying for Vichy France in Syria.


American Pilot Col. Robin Olds is yet another example. (July 14, 1922 – June 14, 2007) was an American fighter pilot and general officer in the U.S. Air Force. He was a "triple ace", with a combined total of 16 victories in World War II and the Vietnam War He retired in 1973 as a brigadier general.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Olds


There are many more examples of pilots who have attained " Ace " status
Commander Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-16, 11:16 AM   #4
Schroeder
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Banana Republic of Germany
Posts: 6,170
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Commander Wallace View Post
From the images, it appears to be a MiG-23 as you mentioned. Wilkipedia suggests the MiG-23 was a fighter / interceptor/ and attack bomber or strike aircraft.
Could also be a 27 which is the ground attack version of the 23.
__________________
Putting Germ back into Germany.
Schroeder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-16, 11:26 AM   #5
Commander Wallace
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Under the sea in an Octupus garden in the shade
Posts: 5,307
Downloads: 366
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schroeder View Post
Could also be a 27 which is the ground attack version of the 23.
Because the MiG 23 and 27 share the same basic airframe and as you said, the MiG 27 is the ground attack version of the MiG 23, you are right, except the MiG 27 has a " Platapus nose " the MiG 23 nose is more stream lined. The picture Oberon posted looks like it has a stream lined nose but it's hard to tell since the aircraft nose profile is not visible in it's entirety.

Last edited by Commander Wallace; 07-07-16 at 11:37 AM.
Commander Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-16, 11:31 AM   #6
Dowly
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 25,054
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0


Default

AFAIK, ground kills were not counted, unless you were someone like Rudel (who, IIRC, was called an ace in terms of ground kills, but not an actual 'ace')

As such, he is no 'ace', but sorry to hear of his loss nevertheless.
Dowly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-16, 12:43 PM   #7
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly View Post
AFAIK, ground kills were not counted, unless you were someone like Rudel (who, IIRC, was called an ace in terms of ground kills, but not an actual 'ace')

As such, he is no 'ace', but sorry to hear of his loss nevertheless.
I think Rudel got 7 air kills too so was also a proper Ace.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-16, 02:04 PM   #8
Raptor1
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Commander Wallace View Post
Because the MiG 23 and 27 share the same basic airframe and as you said, the MiG 27 is the ground attack version of the MiG 23, you are right, except the MiG 27 has a " Platapus nose " the MiG 23 nose is more stream lined. The picture Oberon posted looks like it has a stream lined nose but it's hard to tell since the aircraft nose profile is not visible in it's entirety.
The aircraft in the picture must be a MiG-23 because it has the variable intake ramps that were removed from the MiG-27.
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory
Raptor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-16, 05:28 PM   #9
Commander Wallace
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Under the sea in an Octupus garden in the shade
Posts: 5,307
Downloads: 366
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor1 View Post
The aircraft in the picture must be a MiG-23 because it has the variable intake ramps that were removed from the MiG-27.
I thought as much. I figured someone knowledgeable about aircraft like you, Schroeder or others in the forum would figure it out and correctly Identify the aircraft. I didn't know about the variable intake ramps missing on the MiG 27 though. I know they are there for aiding in compression at supersonic speeds.

I'm guessing they were not needed on a dedicated attack aircraft like the MiG 27 flying subsonic attack missions ?
Commander Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.