![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#13 |
Soaring
|
![]()
Nobody, he had none worth the name. The family fled from the Russiasn from former Sudetenland, and did an odyssey through German cities that all did not want to host the many war refugees. His visiting of the music school where he learned his profession - he played bassoon in the German Symphony Orchestra Berlin) was payed by his father. The whole family suffered for those costs. The elder brother had to go to the German navy early so that he would not have to be fed at home.
But in principle, I question the whole "Umlagesystem" (no translation found) that you refer to, and I do not accept it anymore, because it is endless abuse of the young, for the costs for the later generations always are higher than for the earlier ones. Like you pay today for the food you eat today, you should also have your parents pay for your education now instead of somebody else paying for it, and you later paying EVEN MORE for somebody else's education. Its one huge robbery abusing generation after generation. And the maths do not work, btw. It should be evident for everybody to see today. Else that somebody still has not heard the echo of the shots of the past five years. Like anything else in the papermoney world, the "Umlagesystem" is one huge snowballing system as well. And necessarily there comes the day when the balloon goes burst. It is two different morals colliding here, the morals that are valid in context of small special circles, families, friends, very small communities where people know each other and are more or less "intimate". And the anonymous mega-context of state societies. The morals of the first context, family, say that the adults care for the kids and the younger adults for the elder people. All fine. But in state context, that is not wanted, especially not amongst socialists and state planners, because it leaves responsibility over their lives to the people and thus doe snot give those who want to govern them any control over them, also, the socialist'S wet dream, the one big social collective were strangers are as close and intimate than real families, cannot be enforced with family still being intact and in place. So there comes the plan to destroy burgoise society by destroying families (Marx) and the currency (Lenin). In Germany, the spocilaists now want to push plöans for mandatory state child caretaking from the first year on. Children, so many in the SPD want it, should, be taken out of families from first birthday on and be given into state run kindergarden, where they get taken care of by foreign "experts" of - in Germany traditionally very left leaning - educational professions (calling mothers mothers is sexual discrimination, fathers do not count anyway since they are sexual predators of limited intellectual capacity and in general parents and families cannot be trusted to be able to raise children that they love and wished for, so the state has to intervene here as well, like everywhere else). Children do not like that at all, getting separated from others at that age, they are afraid by it, they hate it and become desperate, but no matter, the individual counts nothing, the collective and the proper brain washing is all. Also, the earlier the mother looses her child, the earlier she can go back into a job and create a tax income that can be used by politicians to pay for all their wonderful things and self-promoting brilliance. The morals of the national society must and should be limited to banning of crime, and that everything is equal before the laws. Any solidarity that gets mandatorily asked of from you that you should have just for any stranger with whom you have nothing to do, prevents solidarity, because you can only be solidaric by your own voluntary decision (that makes socialists' blood boil hot), solidarity that gets blackmailed from you, is demanded totalitarian conformity. You cannot run a state by the morals valid for family context without turning that state into a tyranny where freedom is destroyed. You have to keep both separate. Now compare to what they do in reality, and cry. It's a nightmare that slowly creeps on and on, and pie e by piece the most vital pillars of a true moral social contexts get destroyed - in the name of "social justice" and "solidarity" in the abuse of terms in socialist understanding. Which is pure cynism. We had the Thousand-Years-Reich, and the everliving Soviet Union/German Democratic Republic. Two times socialism in just sixty years, two times monumental fails (and I do not even refer to the bloodbaths). Now we have iron pledges for the Thousand-Years-Currency and vows for the European Democratic Union. Life is running in always the same circles.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|