Human Origins: Are we hybrids?

AngusJS · 12-01-13, 10:43 PM

If different species from the same genus can't produce viable offspring, how can species from completely different orders do so?

WTH is this guy thinking?

Aktungbby · 12-01-13, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AngusJS

If different species from the same genus can't produce viable offspring, how can species from different completely different orders do so? WTH is this guy thinking?

With a hottie Bonobo in estrus and a bushhog in musth...what's thinkin' got to do with it...the little gray guys are jus restockin' the larder...think ultimate doomsday preppers! We're jes the In n' Out burger joint of the outer rim of the MILKY WAY.

kin I git a Hamm's wid dat?

Cybermat47 · 12-01-13, 11:03 PM

So, put simply... an Ape was sick in the head, so it *CENSORED*.

And then all it's children... BLEURGH.

soopaman2 · 12-02-13, 03:22 PM

I saw an interview on a radio show with dr Neil Degrasse Tyson, a world famous astrophysicist, and director of the Hayden Planetarium in NYC.

When asked about why we seem to be above animals by the hosts he said this.

I hope I can convey it right, it may get long.

He said, we are only a slight percentage of DNA off from our closest relatives, say a chimpanzee. We as humans see all animals the same, even though a catfish, may be vastly smarter than a cod, we do not see that because they are so far below us. A chimp can do what most human toddlers can do.

Now imagine a being who is a slight DNA percentage ahead of us, as we are above apes/chimps, these beings will be wheeling Stephen Hawking forward, and marveling about how it can do astrophysics calculations in its head, like this beings little kid.

In other words, human intelligence is not the standard. We are not the top dogs. the law of probability says so.

For interview look up Opie and Anthony, Neil Degrasse Tyson on you tube, and click on the latest dated one. It is there, and he explains it so much better than me.

(edit also check out Dr. Michio Kakus books about the types of civilizations type I type II etc, we are currently a type one, and very much barely.) We barely got simple fusion under control.

We are not hot stuff, in the grand scheme of things, we are nothing.

Aktungbby · 12-02-13, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2

We are not the top dogs. We are not hot stuff, in the grand scheme of things, we are nothing.

LIKE I KEEP TELLIN' YAS'...MODIFIED SASQUATCH...with a little gray?! poupon on the side...

Jimbuna · 12-02-13, 04:50 PM

soopaman2 · 12-02-13, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimbuna

Even in the 25th century we are still nothing in the grand scheme, even the epicness of Jean Luc Picard is nothing compared to the vastness of life in this universe, we are a type 1 people, most advanced civs would consider us not noteworthy.

If you hate american exceptionalism, then you will love my views on human exceptionalism. ;P

Jimbuna · 12-02-13, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cybermat47

So, put simply... an Ape was sick in the head, so it *CENSORED*.

And then all it's children... BLEURGH.

The mind boggles

12-02-13, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AngusJS

WTH is this guy thinking?

Publicity?

soopaman2 · 12-02-13, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Publicity?

The Kim Kardashian of evolution theories?

12-02-13, 05:45 PM

Quote:

The Kim Kardashian of evolution theories?

Yep
But it's not a theory, it's a hypothesis.

antikristuseke · 12-03-13, 03:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Yep
But it's not a theory, it's a hypothesis.

Not much of one at that.

Cybermat47 · 12-03-13, 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by antikristuseke

Not much of one at that.

Are you refuting it out of your scientific knowledge, or because apes doing it to pigs disgusts you?

If it's the second option, I don't blame you

Anyway, I'm going to tell this to all my friends. Back in a bit

antikristuseke · 12-03-13, 03:57 AM

From my limited understanding of genetics. From what little I understand it would be impossible for a primates sperm to fertilize a pigs egg cell or the other way around, hell, the sperm shouldn't even see the egg as a viable target and if injected into it nothing of any consequence would happen. But as was said by Mayers, the person who put up the hypothesis has every opportunity to run experiments and report his findings to peer reviewed papers where his findings can be tested.

Aktungbby · 12-02-13, 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2

The Kim Kardashian of evolution theories?

A Bonobo hottie?

12-01-13, 10:43 PM	#1
AngusJS Seasoned Skipper Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 746 Downloads: 62 Uploads: 0	If different species from the same genus can't produce viable offspring, how can species from completely different orders do so? WTH is this guy thinking? Last edited by AngusJS; 12-02-13 at 07:06 PM.

12-01-13, 11:03 PM	#3
Cybermat47 Willing Webfooted Beast Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Australia Posts: 5,408 Downloads: 300 Uploads: 23	So, put simply... an Ape was sick in the head, so it CENSORED. And then all it's children... BLEURGH. __________________ Historical TWoS Gameplay Guide: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=2572620 Historical FotRSU Gameplay Guide: https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/sho....php?p=2713394

12-02-13, 03:22 PM	#4
soopaman2 Der Alte Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: New Jersey, USA Posts: 3,316 Downloads: 61 Uploads: 0	I saw an interview on a radio show with dr Neil Degrasse Tyson, a world famous astrophysicist, and director of the Hayden Planetarium in NYC. When asked about why we seem to be above animals by the hosts he said this. I hope I can convey it right, it may get long. He said, we are only a slight percentage of DNA off from our closest relatives, say a chimpanzee. We as humans see all animals the same, even though a catfish, may be vastly smarter than a cod, we do not see that because they are so far below us. A chimp can do what most human toddlers can do. Now imagine a being who is a slight DNA percentage ahead of us, as we are above apes/chimps, these beings will be wheeling Stephen Hawking forward, and marveling about how it can do astrophysics calculations in its head, like this beings little kid. In other words, human intelligence is not the standard. We are not the top dogs. the law of probability says so. For interview look up Opie and Anthony, Neil Degrasse Tyson on you tube, and click on the latest dated one. It is there, and he explains it so much better than me. (edit also check out Dr. Michio Kakus books about the types of civilizations type I type II etc, we are currently a type one, and very much barely.) We barely got simple fusion under control. We are not hot stuff, in the grand scheme of things, we are nothing. __________________ If Hitler invaded Hell I would make at least a favourable reference to the devil in the House of Commons. -Winston Churchill- The most fascinating man in the world. Last edited by soopaman2; 12-02-13 at 03:39 PM.

12-02-13, 04:50 PM	#6
Jimbuna Chief of the Boat Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: 250 metres below the surface Posts: 190,946 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 13	__________________ Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something. Oh my God, not again!!

12-03-13, 03:57 AM	#14
antikristuseke Silent Hunter Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Estland Posts: 4,330 Downloads: 3 Uploads: 0	From my limited understanding of genetics. From what little I understand it would be impossible for a primates sperm to fertilize a pigs egg cell or the other way around, hell, the sperm shouldn't even see the egg as a viable target and if injected into it nothing of any consequence would happen. But as was said by Mayers, the person who put up the hypothesis has every opportunity to run experiments and report his findings to peer reviewed papers where his findings can be tested.