Tyranny from the IRS

[TarJak]

Bubbles, what have you done about this injustice? Have you written to your congressman or senator to get the unjust law repealed? Have you made any attempt to assist the persecuted?

Posting a poorly researched rant on Subsim is the best way to get the law changed? Try doing something about it, if it is such a problem that gets up your nose so much.

[vienna]

^^^ What he said +1 ...


<O>

[Cybermat47]

Originally Posted by TarJak

Bubbles, what have you done about this injustice? Have you written to your congressman or senator to get the unjust law repealed? Have you made any attempt to assist the persecuted?

Posting a poorly researched rant on Subsim is the best way to get the law changed? Try doing something about the problem if it is such a problem that gets up your nose so much.

That's... that's actually a very good point.

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by TarJak

Bubbles, what have you done about this injustice? Have you written to your congressman or senator to get the unjust law repealed? Have you made any attempt to assist the persecuted?

Posting a poorly researched rant on Subsim is the best way to get the law changed? Try doing something about it, if it is such a problem that gets up your nose so much.

Tarjak, I am involved with this offline and online, I have protested, I have written letters to various officials and absolutely plan to write a book one day in the future on this issue.Once I am practicing, I plan to handle as many of these type of cases as possible, .Honestly, you don't know me and it's insulting for you to sit here and say all I have done is talk about this on subsim.I share the message as much as possible, so why don't you think before you speak, thanks.

Poorly researched? no I looked them up, I see them as victims of a tyrannical government.I coudl care less if they broke this law.They are standing up to an unjust law and now, the wife is being persecuted, even after the judge offered a reasonable compromise but the tyrants at the IRS said NO, because they want to show their power by putting a citizen in jail for daring to challenge them.

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

Tarjak, I am involved with this offline and online, I have protested, I have written letters to various officials and absolutely plan to write a book one day in the future on this issue.Once I am practicing, I plan to handle as many of these type of cases as possible, .Honestly, you don't know me and it's insulting for you to sit here and say all I have done is talk about this on subsim.I share the message as much as possible, so why don't you think before you speak, thanks.

Poorly researched? no I looked them up, I see them as victims of a tyrannical government.I coudl care less if they broke this law.They are standing up to an unjust law and now, the wife is being persecuted, even after the judge offered a reasonable compromise but the tyrants at the IRS said NO, because they want to show their power by putting a citizen in jail for daring to challenge them.

So you will be 'defending' people by saying "I could care less if they broke this law". Yeah. That'll work. Sure...

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by AndyJWest

So you will be 'defending' people by saying "I could care less if they broke this law". Yeah. That'll work. Sure...

Of course not, there are other ways to do it, but this is not court.

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

Of course not, there are other ways to do it, but this is not court.

Ok then, how would you defend them?

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by AndyJWest

Ok then, how would you defend them?

jury nullification, it is a beautiful thing.

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

jury nullification, it is a beautiful thing.

A lawyer defending a criminal case may zealously advocate for the acquittal of his client using any evidentiary argument for which he has a reasonable good faith basis. Current legal standards strongly disfavor jury nullification and prohibit express exhortations that a jury nullify the law. Accordingly, a lawyer may not, consistent with the rules of professional conduct, expressly urge a jury to disregard the law. Nor may a lawyer disregard a ruling of the tribunal limiting the scope of permissible argument.

http://www.dcbar.org/for_lawyers/eth...opinion320.cfm

[Oberon]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

but this is not court.

"You are in the court-room of world opinion, and you can answer, yes or no?"

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by Oberon

"You are in the court-room of world opinion, and you can answer, yes or no?"

Adlai Stevenson? REALLY? lol

[Wolferz]

So, where's all the research regarding the illegal means used to pass the income tax laws?

[TarJak]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

Tarjak, I am involved with this offline and online, I have protested, I have written letters to various officials and absolutely plan to write a book one day in the future on this issue.Once I am practicing, I plan to handle as many of these type of cases as possible, .

Well done you. What response have you gotten? I can only assume you are using different language to suit your audience? Using your usual subsim style is likely to get your correspondence put in the round file pretty quickly.

Honestly, you don't know me and it's insulting for you to sit here and say all I have done is talk about this on subsim.I share the message as much as possible, so why don't you think before you speak, thanks.

I could care less about whether you feel insulted. I also could care less about what you think of me or my posts here. We both know it doesn't matter. Or at least one of us does.

Poorly researched? no I looked them up, I see them as victims of a tyrannical government.I coudl care less if they broke this law.They are standing up to an unjust law and now, the wife is being persecuted, even after the judge offered a reasonable compromise but the tyrants at the IRS said NO, because they want to show their power by putting a citizen in jail for daring to challenge them.