SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-06-13, 07:30 AM   #841
Sammi79
XO
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Penzance
Posts: 428
Downloads: 272
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feuer Frei! View Post
IIRC,
The UN report has 1 objective:
To show that Chemical weapons were used.
Not who used them.
Yes I know. The report will i suspect summarise a detailed analysis of the exact chemical makeup however, which could indicate the method of production...
__________________
Gadewais fy beic nghadwyno i'r rhai a rheiliau, pan wnes i ddychwelyd, yno mae'n roedd...

Wedi mynd.

Sammi79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-13, 07:50 AM   #842
Feuer Frei!
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Valhalla
Posts: 5,295
Downloads: 141
Uploads: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sammi79 View Post
which could indicate the method of production...
Which may show that it was produced in another country and imported.
So, back to square one.

Syria doesn’t yet appear to have the capacity to produce the weapons entirely on its own.
__________________
"History is the lies that the victors agree on"- Napoleon

LINK TO MY SH 3 MODS
Feuer Frei! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-13, 07:55 AM   #843
Sammi79
XO
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Penzance
Posts: 428
Downloads: 272
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feuer Frei! View Post
Which may show that it was produced in another country and imported.
So, back to square one.

Syria doesn’t yet appear to have the capacity to produce the weapons entirely on its own.
Alternatively it may show the chemicals were not made by or for military industry. Which would cast serious doubts on official responsibility.
__________________
Gadewais fy beic nghadwyno i'r rhai a rheiliau, pan wnes i ddychwelyd, yno mae'n roedd...

Wedi mynd.

Sammi79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-13, 08:00 AM   #844
Penguin
Ocean Warrior
 
Penguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Rheinische Republik
Posts: 3,322
Downloads: 92
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly View Post
If you want to continue this, may I suggest you post your response to this thread:
http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=205143

No need to clutter this one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tchocky View Post
Oh God, let's not do this.
The Pengu abides!

Though I didn't want to revive a clear attempt of drive-by-trolling, so I have created a new one to continue the discussion here: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=207224
Penguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-13, 08:06 AM   #845
Feuer Frei!
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Valhalla
Posts: 5,295
Downloads: 141
Uploads: 17
Default

Let's quickly break down the UN Weapons Team Inspection.

Firstly, it is knowledge now that the inspections were limited.

An hour and a half was all that was spent at the impact sites.

No houses were visited whilst there, they were asked to exhume bodies by the local doctor but they refused.

After that one and a half hours, they were ordered to evac asap.

There was another 6 sites which they could not visit.

Did the Syrian government order them out? Or was it the UN?
No one knows.

To say that the inspection was incomplete is an understatement.
__________________
"History is the lies that the victors agree on"- Napoleon

LINK TO MY SH 3 MODS
Feuer Frei! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-13, 08:07 AM   #846
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,226
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

This is a copy of the letter I just wrote to my senator:

Quote:
Senator Warren,
I want you to oppose the Presidents attempt to get our country involved in yet another middle eastern war. Not just pull a Markey by refusing to do your job but actively oppose it.

The fact is that we can't eliminate Assads chemical weapons by air strikes alone and sending in ground troops is not and should not be considered a valid option (so far anyways). Unless you can accomplish something of value you should not attack. There is too much to risk for escalation to attack for just symbolic purposes.

Also two important words you should remember here Professor: "Collateral Damage".

If you strike there WILL be civilians injured and killed and footage of their bodies WILL be gleefully broadcast around the world by our enemies. Any politician who votes for intervention is definitely going to have this footage used against them the next time they run for reelection. If you automatically support the administration in this, like you have slavishly done since you gained office, you can expect to be labeled as a war monger and rightfully so. I don't think you really want to be dealing with pictures of dead civilians that you had authorized killing in when you run again in 2018.

This isn't party politics as usual. It's a chance to show that you vote based on the issues instead of the party line.


Sincerely,
Don't know if will help but it can't hurt.



__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-13, 08:29 AM   #847
Ducimus
Rear Admiral
 
Ducimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,987
Downloads: 67
Uploads: 2


Default

So much speculation, so little that anyone can do. BO is gonna do what he wants regardless. Though i do wonder if he'll push ahead without congress approval that he asked for or not. Might be political suicide, but hes a lame duck anyway.
Ducimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-13, 10:17 AM   #848
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
IIRC Irans F14s haven't flown in a while, certainly not en masse, spares are a bit of a problem and the sanctions have hit them hard, the Iranian airforce is not in good shape, but it could certainly put up a couple of fighters, 29s most likely, but they wouldn't cope very well against the USAF, not in a direct one on one situation. So I don't think they'd put themselves in that situation where they would have to directly confront the USAF.
Asymmetrical warfare is a possibility, but we thought Saddam would do that and he didn't, so it's 50/50, after all in the immortal words of Condie Rice, 'Iran is not Iraq'.
Iran only operates a dozen or so F-14s but those ones are actually quite decently maintained, they have also fitted them for Russian R-27 missiles.

One of the currently operational ones with the new camo pattern:


Quote:
Originally Posted by Feuer Frei! View Post
Iran has Mig 29's, F-5's and a few Mirage F1's.

Mirage F1:

<snip>
Some of Iran's Mirages just got an overhaul at Shahid Nasser Habibi air base.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-13, 10:40 AM   #849
Armistead
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: on the Dan
Posts: 10,880
Downloads: 364
Uploads: 0


Default

Watching the news yesterday, talking about how we're training Syrian Rebels to fight in Jordan. The problem, trainers say it's about impossible to vet the fighters, who is moderate, radical or terrorist, so much so can't really arm them. If we're so worried we can't decide who is safe to train, give them some decent weapons, then what the hell are we thinking about bombing Assad?
__________________

You see my dog don't like people laughing. He gets the crazy idea you're laughing at him. Now if you apologize like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.
Armistead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-13, 11:29 AM   #850
Ducimus
Rear Admiral
 
Ducimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,987
Downloads: 67
Uploads: 2


Default



SJRES (AS OF 9/5/13)
http://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/me...c/DAV13973.pdf
Ducimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-13, 11:30 AM   #851
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

The former governor of Iran's Kish Province wrote online that in the event of a US attack on Syria the families of American officials would be kidnapped and tortured while the President's younger daughter would be taken and raped.

__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-13, 11:46 AM   #852
eddie
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,023
Downloads: 99
Uploads: 0
Default

A lot of tpough talk going on, not much substance though.

http://news.msn.com/world/iran-milit...f-syria-struck
eddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-13, 11:58 AM   #853
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike View Post
Iran only operates a dozen or so F-14s but those ones are actually quite decently maintained, they have also fitted them for Russian R-27 missiles.

One of the currently operational ones with the new camo pattern:

Some of Iran's Mirages just got an overhaul at Shahid Nasser Habibi air base.
How did they...

No...don't tell me...






Embargoes my arse...
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-13, 12:12 PM   #854
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Jeremy Bowen - Ice Cream in Damascus:
http://www.newstatesman.com/world-af...cream-damascus
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-13, 01:26 PM   #855
Ducimus
Rear Admiral
 
Ducimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,987
Downloads: 67
Uploads: 2


Default

(47:31 )

Is it me, or when asked if he would go ahead anyway without congressional approval, he dodged the question with circle talk?
Ducimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.