Creationist Explains How Humans Could Have Hunted The Tyrannosaurus Rex

[Simmy]

A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step—known as a theory—in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.

Yes, when you need something to hang on to to keep from drowning, you create your own definition. Much like they did with the word "planet".

Per my earlier link, there is no such thing as "fact" in science, just today's assumptions waiting to be disproven. What you choose to ignore is that the majority of scientists accept evolution because it is the theory that currently fits the known facts (i.e. the fossil record) the best. Tomorrow it may no longer be, but that's tomorrow.

Oh I don't ignore anything and understand that most scientist accept one or the other of the many versions of the theory. That still does not make it fact.


http://ncse.com/evolution/education/...cientific-work
Yes there is truth in science, well truth as far as we will ever be able to prove it. That's when something is so well proven that no one can demonstrate it to be wrong.

Third, when have I attacked you? Saying you're playing the same game? That was a reference to what I said earlier, that you're repeating arguments you've already made in a fashion that makes it look like you've come up with something new.

When was it I made this argument before? You must be confusing me with someone else. And who could come up with something new concerning something people have argued about now since the 1800's? That is a ridiculous statement.

My original post was mainly in light of the title of this thread. Men never walk the earth with dinosaurs, though it appears both have existed.

Anyway each to his own.