KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!

Oberon · 12-06-12, 05:43 AM

http://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/sci...rst-fears.html

Abrams, you better be screwing with us, because Cumberbatch may have a cult fan following, but he's no Montalban.

Nice trailer though, although again it's all explosions and that, but that seems par for the course for new Trek, I'll still watch it.

Rhodes · 12-06-12, 06:25 AM

It was something that was coming from a long way. The villain had to be Khan (Kirk great nemesis, etc). Did not dislike the trailer, and now I want to know how is the movie, the story etc.
On the other side, by the description of the trailer early this week plus some rumors, one have to shout Gary Mitchel instead of Khan!

But, Is the enterprise also a submarine?

TLAM Strike · 12-06-12, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhodes

On the other side, by the description of the trailer early this week plus some rumors, one have to shout Gary Mitchel instead of Khan!

Yea Gary Mitchel would have been better. Based on the plot summery I was also thinking Garth of Izar was possible.

Khan... that really disappoints me...

Quote:

But, Is the enterprise also a submarine?

http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Bala...rror_(episode)

http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Starship_Down_(episode)

Rhodes · 12-06-12, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike

http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Bala...rror_(episode)

http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Starship_Down_(episode)

A bit different don't you think?

"Fry: How many atmospheres can the ship withstand?!

Prof. Farnsworth: Well, it's a spaceship, so I would say anywhere between 0 and 1."

Jimbuna · 12-06-12, 12:14 PM

Gotta be worth a viewing even on the grounds it's a Trek movie at the very least.

Platapus · 12-06-12, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna

Gotta be worth a viewing even on the grounds it's a Trek movie at the very least.

After that abomination in 2009? No thank you. For some of us it is simply better to try to forget JJ Abrams.

12-06-12, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike

Yea Gary Mitchel would have been better. Based on the plot summery I was also thinking Garth of Izar was possible.

I think a movie with Gary Mitchel was actually done as a villain in this -Unofficial- Star Trek Movie: (Worth a watch sometimes, even has Walter Koenig as Chekov!)

12-06-12, 05:43 AM	#1
Oberon Lucky Jack Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 25,976 Downloads: 61 Uploads: 20	KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN! http://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/sci...rst-fears.html Abrams, you better be screwing with us, because Cumberbatch may have a cult fan following, but he's no Montalban. Nice trailer though, although again it's all explosions and that, but that seems par for the course for new Trek, I'll still watch it.

12-06-12, 06:25 AM	#2
Rhodes Silent Hunter Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Figueira da Foz, Portugal Posts: 4,523 Downloads: 110 Uploads: 0	It was something that was coming from a long way. The villain had to be Khan (Kirk great nemesis, etc). Did not dislike the trailer, and now I want to know how is the movie, the story etc. On the other side, by the description of the trailer early this week plus some rumors, one have to shout Gary Mitchel instead of Khan! But, Is the enterprise also a submarine? __________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/16416646@N05/

12-06-12, 12:14 PM	#5
Jimbuna Chief of the Boat Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: 250 metres below the surface Posts: 191,405 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 13	Gotta be worth a viewing even on the grounds it's a Trek movie at the very least. __________________ Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something. Oh my God, not again!!