![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#13 | |
Soaring
|
![]() Quote:
That some kids get raised by alcoholic parents or junkeys, would lead nobody to now demand that alcoholics and junkeys should be allowed to adopt children. Homosexual people may not be junkeys or alcoholics, but the social setting their relation represents is such that the sexual role modelling factors are different from that a child experiences with a mother and a father. A gay man or or a lesbian woman cannot replace a mother or a father, like a single parents cannot replace the missing counterpart in case of divorce or death of one parent. That'S why in most countries singles cannot adopt children, as far as I know, except they are the biological parents. And that is the one exception where I accept adoptation by homosexual couples as well: if it is indeed the biological child of one pf the adults, from an earlier mixed relationship. Note: I said relationship, implying their is a contact and state of familiarity between both. In case of a child resulting from a brief affair or a one-night-stand, it already becomes complicated again. If I rate the interest iof the child as the highest good, I would treat that constellation the same like foreigners wanting to adopt a foreign child. Very fri-hi-hightening all, that, eh? Beware tayranney! Beware the Fuhuhurer! Beware the dicidicitatorship! A rule has been spotted somewhere? Oh you poor freedom - duck and cover, they are really going after ya! Nonsense. It is old-fashioned common sense, nothing more. And of course, it is politically incorrect and makes gender-engineers shiver indeed. I would feel I said something wrong if they would agree with me, for all what modern genderism stands for imo is totally and completely wrong, and a crime against human nature and against socially responsible culture. For readers fluid in German language, i again refer to the site cuncti.net where they have most of their essays on issues of genderism, feminism, anti-male discrimination (which already starts in schools, btw), education and occasionally on same-sex marriages - and on the psychological, cultural and financial costs of these social experiments. Heck, genderism is not even a real science, it is pure ideology only,but iot gets treated with all the respect and benefits of a science, science has repeatedly proven it wrong on all accounts. This of course does not stop the propaganda claiming different. The deconstruction of families and the denial of differences in psychological structure and it'S development in boys and girls, resulting for example in different interests, is a huge disaster, and is something that is payed for by the psychological health and "life-happiness" of our children. Reductionists and materialists - and feminists and lefties are both of that, both feminism and socialism are extremely reductionistic schools of utmost materialism, like capitalism also is - have big troubles to understand and to see this. They lack the terms and structure to see it. If you want to feel frightened by something, then maybe you better should be frightened by them. ![]()
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|