Wikileaks' Julian Assange seeks Supreme Court hearing

[Jimbuna]

The Ecuadorians wanted him, they can have him...sickness and in health...for richer for poorer...etc etc. I hear tell Stockholm has some magnificent Medical Facilities and of course the Majestic Moose

[BossMark]

Originally Posted by jimbuna

Ecuador asks whether Assange can leave their embassy to receive medical treatment, if he keeps his fingers crossed so it doesn't count...

This after or before he slips down those stairs

[Jimbuna]

Originally Posted by BossMark

This after or before he slips down those stairs

Either, I'm not really bothered either way...he lost any sympathy I may have had for him when he jumped bail.

[Gerald]

[Tchocky]

Nah Julian, you're a villain because you jumped bail and won't face justice in Sweden. Innocent or guilty, hiding out in an embassy doesn't prove anything.

[Gerald]

^That's right, good move

[Jimbuna]

Originally Posted by Tchocky

Nah Julian, you're a villain because you jumped bail and won't face justice in Sweden. Innocent or guilty, hiding out in an embassy doesn't prove anything.

Precisely and as posted in #18

[Gerald]

Glad you corrected it so that no misunderstandings arise in the future,

[Catfish]

Originally Posted by Vendor

You missed Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook:
"I give out all private information to security services and companies, and i am a hero!"



But interesting again, the messenger gets the bad press, while what he found out is not an issue.

"My country is murdering civilians ?
Does not matter, as a patriot i kill the one who found that out."
Hypocritic retards.

[Skybird]

Originally Posted by Tchocky

Nah Julian, you're a villain because you jumped bail and won't face justice in Sweden.

Even if it is just a stageact in order to trap you - you must play by the rules and allow getting trapped. Be stupid. Play by your enemy'S rules. "Justice" demands it.

Innocent or guilty, hiding out in an embassy doesn't prove anything.

Which he must not, since he is not formally charged. They want to question him on highly dubious claims risen against him, and on basis of a Swedish law that in principle allows any women unsatisfied with the sex she had to sue her lover over claims of rape - becasue she just felt bad afterwards. When I read that law the fist time and read a lawyers explanation of it, I just did not trust my eyes. It is hilarious. But hey, its Sweden, the home of gender-engineering and denial of any biological differences between male and female, so one should not be surprised, maybe.

If they only want to question him, they could have met him on neutral territory, or even in London. It would not have been the first time that in this sort of constellation such a solution has been practiced. That the Swedish rules that out shows that this never has been about questioning him, but that they want him in their fangs and this can only be reasonably explained by the US making pressure and wanting to take revenge against him. It is also part of a basic campaign to destroy Wikileaks and reducing if not eliminating Assange's freedom to act, in order to take him out of action. This part of the plot without doubt has worked until here.

[Gerald]

What is true in the case of Assange, it is that when he was here last, so messed the Swedish prosecutor's office to take him to court, and Assange left the country, that is a legal mistake, that Sweden did not choose to interview him on neutral half of the field is very prestigious.

[Jimbuna]

Originally Posted by Skybird

Even if it is just a stageact in order to trap you - you must play by the rules and allow getting trapped. Be stupid. Play by your enemy'S rules. "Justice" demands it.



Which he must not, since he is not formally charged. They want to question him on highly dubious claims risen against him, and on basis of a Swedish law that in principle allows any women unsatisfied with the sex she had to sue her lover over claims of rape - becasue she just felt bad afterwards. When I read that law the fist time and read a lawyers explanation of it, I just did not trust my eyes. It is hilarious. But hey, its Sweden, the home of gender-engineering and denial of any biological differences between male and female, so one should not be surprised, maybe.

If they only want to question him, they could have met him on neutral territory, or even in London. It would not have been the first time that in this sort of constellation such a solution has been practiced. That the Swedish rules that out shows that this never has been about questioning him, but that they want him in their fangs and this can only be reasonably explained by the US making pressure and wanting to take revenge against him. It is also part of a basic campaign to destroy Wikileaks and reducing if not eliminating Assange's freedom to act, in order to take him out of action. This part of the plot without doubt has worked until here.

As our US cousins say..."He's done, stick a fork in him".

[Gerald]

[Jimbuna]

Originally Posted by Vendor

Glad you corrected it so that no misunderstandings arise in the future,

Simply pointing out a mutual opinion.

[Skybird]

Originally Posted by Vendor

What is true in the case of Assange, it is that when he was here last, so messed the Swedish prosecutor's office to take him to court, and Assange left the country, that is a legal mistake, that Sweden did not choose to interview him on neutral half of the field is very prestigious.

When I know that "justice" is being hijacked and abused by an extremely powerful enemy-to-the-death in order to secure control of my physical person, I would jump bail, too. The Swedish allowed the "justice" system to get abused for political opportunism and by being pushed by a very powerful foreign nation.

Assange pissed a huge empire and stripped the regime down to its underpants. The US will never forgive for being shown like that in public. All that dirty laundry of theirs was meant to be kept secret, forever. And then came Assange and pulled them into the spotlight. Scandal! Crime...! Treason...!!!

the only scandals lay in some of the information revealed, and in the fact that the wide public does not draw consequences form this, and those responsible for these things are still in power, sometimes even got re-elected meanwhile. THAT is the real scandal.

Shoot the messenger, ignore the message. That's the name of the game.