Progressive Liberalism is a Mental Dissorder (merged)

[Betonov]

Ma, usi ste mal prtegnen

[Hottentot]

Originally Posted by Betonov

Ma, usi ste mal prtegnen

Puhusis sääki suamee vaa ulukomuanelävä.

And thanks, Dowly.

[Penguin]

Originally Posted by Dowly

The only thing wrong with it was the word "kierre", I guess you mean't the word thread,
which I'd translate to "ketju"(=chain) in this case. Then, there's the stuff
you need to apply to the end of the word, so the correct sentence would be:

Kirjoitatte hyvin ruotsia tässä ketjussa.

Ah, thanks, yes, thread was what I meant, and i also had to attend this weird inessive case for the last word too. *putting a knot in my brain*

In German you can also use the word 'Faden' for a (internet) thread, or better 'Diskussionsfaden' - so I thought it might also apply in Finnish.

[Penguin]

Originally Posted by Betonov

Ma, usi ste mal prtegnen

Moje vozilo na zracni blazini je polno jegu!

[HunterICX]

Met de billen bloot op de paus z'n schoot.

HunterICX

[Oberon]

Wot the gypsy nell is garn on 'ere. Load of strange rabbit if you ask me.

[u crank]

Originally Posted by Skybird

Congrats, if that is so, then you are a fully realised Buddha, the returning messiah in Chrsitian terminology.....

The key word there was similar. I think you know what I meant, but I will give you the benefit of the doubt.

Originally Posted by Skybird

Sigh. Atheists do not believe something...

My original thought here had nothing to do with Atheism, but rather with Buddhism and meditation and Atheism's view of them. Buddhism is a religion, granted one without a deity. Meditation and Zen are directly related to this religion. For Atheists to criticize other religions and give Buddhism a pass is kinda funny.

Again I stress that Buddhism is not a theistic belief but many of the things criticized in Theistic religions are present in Buddhism. Some examples.

- The historical Buddha. Accounts of his life, discourses, and monastic rules are believed by Buddhists to have been summarized after his death and memorized by his followers. Various collections of teachings attributed to him were passed down by oral tradition, and first committed to writing about 400 years later. Gee that sounds familiar.

-Some of his teaching and beliefs.

Originally Posted by Skybird

Buddha was asked oine day whether there is a surviving indiovidual soul, and he said a clear and sounding "No".

Why should I believe this? Did he prove it or is it just his opinion? Billions of people would disagree.

-The Inequality of Women. Although in Western Buddhist practice this is not common in traditional practice and history, Buddhism is gender bias. Again this sounds familiar.

-Divisions within Buddhism. Buddhist traditions all claim that through a long and accurate teacher-student lineage, their practices were those ordained by the Buddha. Yet major divisions exist between the branches of Buddhism as to what practices are good, what are bad, and what the beliefs of the religion are.

There are many others but I think I've made my point. I realize that you are not a practising Buddhist but the relationship between Zen and meditation and Buddhism is quite plain. This has nothing to do with Atheism or belief in a deity. It is about practising something whose origins are just as questionable as any religion.

If Zen and meditation have made your life better this is good. I am happy for you but it is not for me. I do not wish to replace my present reality of mind with another. I am at peace and have no enemies. I am confident about the future. Am I delusional? Well that's possible but it's a chance we all take. It's a dangerous world.

P.S.

To any Buddhist who may read this, I hope I have not offended you. The points made were for the sake of the discussion.

To quote MH, May the Schwartz be with you.........

[Skybird]

Originally Posted by u crank

My original thought here had nothing to do with Atheism, but rather with Buddhism and meditation and Atheism's view of them. Buddhism is a religion, granted one without a deity. Meditation and Zen are directly related to this religion. For Atheists to criticize other religions and give Buddhism a pass is kinda funny.

Again I stress that Buddhism is not a theistic belief but many of the things criticized in Theistic religions are present in Buddhism. Some examples

Many Buddhist authors woudl disagree with you, and like me would point out that the essence of Buddhism does not matchz the purpose to serve as a funda,mewnt for rtelgion. However, I admitted that nevertheless it was picked up by politicians and preists and distrorted and complemented with rites and riotuals and hierarchies and all that institutional stuff that indeed turned them then into relgious business like any other. But to me that is not the real essence of it.

I find the parallels b etween essential Buddhism and essential Jesus'
message stunning. I am not the first comparing Zen and Christian Mysticism therefore. The book I recommended also bases on that. And indeed, I would claim that Christian Mysticism also is no relgion.

Why should I believe this? Did he prove it or is it just his opinion? Billions of people would disagree.

You should believe nothing, not him, not me, not anybody. You should care for yourself. From the Kalamas Sutra which is famous for its encouragement of freed inquiry, the one passage that to me is one of the most important revelations about Buddhism there is:

Rely not on the teacher/person, but on the teaching. Rely not on the words of the teaching, but on the spirit of the words. Rely not on theory, but on experience. Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. Do not believe anything because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything because it is written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and the benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it."

-The Inequality of Women. Although in Western Buddhist practice this is not common in traditional practice and history, Buddhism is gender bias. Again this sounds familiar.

That is a cultural thing going beyond Buddhism. Today there are Buddhist female abbots both in Asia and the West. However, as I admitted two times now, Buddhism was hijacked by politicians indeed to serve as a tool for controling the crowd, securing priviliges and gaining power and authority. But that is not what Buddha taught, and not what Jesus taught. Until today I cannot get the church and the story of the cleansing of the temple under one hood. And whgile I do not want to defend the Chineses' actions over Tibet, one thning theya claim in defence, is correct: the ruling of the Tibrtan schools of Buddhism has had a very supressive effect on the ordinary population, secured priviliges and control for kind of an elite caste. To me, Tibetan Buddhism is a Buddhist parallel to the Catholic church.

-Divisions within Buddhism. Buddhist traditions all claim that through a long and accurate teacher-student lineage, their practices were those ordained by the Buddha. Yet major divisions exist between the branches of Buddhism as to what practices are good, what are bad, and what the beliefs of the religion are.

Test and check yourself, with reason and logic. Yes, much there is distportion, is esoteric hamsterwheeling- but you are free to choose. As I see it, the basic teachings of Chan are what it is about, and these teachings are such that they do not support the founding of a relgious circus and all that. they are empirically founded, they base on your own experience of explorating your mind, and are open to validation andf falsification. that quotre from the Kalamas Sutra has much, very much to do with it. You should not believe - no them, not me, not in anything - how often must I repeat this before you hear it?

There are many others but I think I've made my point. I realize that you are not a practising Buddhist but the relationship between Zen and meditation and Buddhism is quite plain. This has nothing to do with Atheism or belief in a deity. It is about practising something whose origins are just as questionable as any religion.

I tested it, and since a long time. From my yoluth on I got trained privately by a colleague of my father, a Japanese who trained me together with his son, for over ten years, in Zen, Bushido, swords, meditation - daily. He was like a second father to me. I then left Berlin for studying at university, and there learned students practicing Tibetan Buddhism, Nyigma lineage and Kagyu lineage. I lived in a Buddhist center for several months, trying to combine psychology and therapy with Buddhist psychology and meditation. But I have strong reservations over Tibetan practicing, see above. It is indeed religion and cult and showbiz and money-making, and that is why I don'T like it. Then came the years when I started to travel, North africa and the Middle East, my exploration into Islam, if you want, and at that time I was introduced to Wolfgang Kopp whom I recommend to you by his book. He heads a Tao-Chan centre here in Germany and is so-called dharma-successor of a well-known French Zen-master. He became my second mentor, and although I only met him some times, these meetings were incredibly intense, personal, and mutually intimate. He then threw me out, saying that he could not offer me any more than what I already had, and that I should start teaching myself. Which I did. I ran meditation classes in a "culture-free" setting for several years, every morning.

So you see, there was a time when I was young and stupid, and when I took risks on trips that I should have not taken, and when I took pride in claiming myself to be "Buddhist" - while all I did by doing so was illustrating what a fool I was. Today, I do not care for such labels, and that is why your description of whether you think I am a practicing Buddhist or not, is competely pointless to me - think what you want, its your pictures in your brain, not mine. If people ask me for a self-description today, I leave it to saying that I consider myself to be a spiritual atheist. I enjoy to see eyebrows frowning then, but it is the most precise description for sure that I can give. Not that any of that matters, not for me, not for anyone else.

If Zen and meditation have made your life better this is good. I am happy for you but it is not for me. I do not wish to replace my present reality of mind with another.

As long as you accept responsibility for your choice and realise that your choice is an active act by you and nothing that happened to you, that's fine for you. I did not approach you, and I never meant to missionise you. I explained some things (more or less...) after you stated some things and asked me over some things. What you make of that does not affect me, as I see it. I just claim the right to take you by your words - that'S why there was some head-banging in the past between the two of us.

To any Buddhist who may read this, I hope I have not offended you. The points made were for the sake of the discussion.

Heck, have people become sensible these days. Some quotes by House on my mind, but okay...

[u crank]

Originally Posted by Skybird

But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and the benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.

This is wisdom and well worth considering.

I read with great interest you history with regards to your training and interest in Zen and meditation. This helps me greatly in understanding where you are coming from on this and other topics. Thank you for sharing.

Originally Posted by Skybird

If people ask me for a self-description today, I leave it to saying that I consider myself to be a spiritual atheist. I enjoy to see eyebrows frowning then, but it is the most precise description for sure that I can give. Not that any of that matters, not for me, not for anyone else.

I for one am not frowning. It matters a little.

Originally Posted by Skybird

... I did not approach you, and I never meant to missionise you. I explained some things (more or less...) after you stated some things and asked me over some things. What you make of that does not affect me, as I see it. I just claim the right to take you by your words - that'S why there was some head-banging in the past between the two of us.

A little head banging is good. Keeps us sharp. No doubt we will have the pleasure again.

A final thought. One thing I am convinced of as I get older is that the old saying it is better to laugh than to cry is sound advice. I do not consider that this life is a joke, but it is definitely a comedy of sorts. Absurdity is best handled with a grin.

Take care.

[Skybird]

"To fathom Zen means to fathom ourselves; to fathom ourselves means to forget ourselves; to forget ourselves means to find our original nature." (Dogen, 13th century).

Compare with Kant's philosophy on insight - and it's limits set by the material nature of our existence.

[yubba]

It is called controlled freakiness, with the onset of god like behavior, able to turn ones words around to make new meaning, sounds like one of my X's. Be back got a picture of a doggie to move. See this is the picture that started it all, I didn't figure it would be the bases of a thread. I knew Nikimcbee would have got a kickout of it as the caption was{ looks like someone jumped ship} you don't know what critters do when they sneak out, up in the pt model forum ... OOOOhh it's policial,,, no it's a dog in a sweater. My case in point. Now it is political. Have a good time with this thread, I know i will. OOOppss almost forgot to move doggie in sweater picture.

[Oberon]

[Hottentot]

I declare the official theme music of this thread.

[soopaman2]

Your right Yubba!

Right wing fascist extremism is so much better!

Mussolini/Scalia in 2012.

[HunterICX]

Originally Posted by Hottentot

I declare the official theme music of this thread.

No....this one's better


HunterICX