SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-29-12, 01:55 PM   #31
Dowly
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 25,054
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaddogK View Post
So they just let Deckard run off with Rachael (who'se supposedly the only replicant without an expiration date), and the details about the implanted memory of a unicorn are in Deckards file for Gaff to read ?

I don't think the unicorn is referring to Deckard at all, always thought it referred to Rachael since that ending scene when Deckard holding the oragami unicorn has Gaff narrating 'too bad she wont live...', but Gaff doesn't know she wont 'expire' after 4 years.
Considering the DC and FC, the unicorn origami is definitely aimed at Deckard.
That's pretty much the point of the unicorn scene: to tie it with the origami
in the end and have the viewer put 2 + 2 together and figure out Deckard is
a replicant himself.
Dowly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-12, 02:47 PM   #32
MaddogK
XO
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago, Ill.
Posts: 409
Downloads: 15
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly View Post
Considering the DC and FC, the unicorn origami is definitely aimed at Deckard.
That's pretty much the point of the unicorn scene: to tie it with the origami
in the end and have the viewer put 2 + 2 together and figure out Deckard is
a replicant himself.
Sadly (or gladly) I read the original P.K.Dick story before the dir cut was released, so the suggestion from the later cuts didn't work on me.

Quote:
Relevant opinions from those involved:

  • Philip K. Dick wrote the character Deckard as a human.[17]
  • Hampton Fancher (original screenwriter) has said that he wrote the character Deckard as a human, but wanted the film to suggest the possibility that he may be a replicant. When asked, "Is Deckard a replicant?", Fancher replied, "No. It wasn't like I had a tricky idea about Deckard that way."[18] During a discussion panel with Ridley Scott to discuss Blade Runner: The Final Cut, Fancher again stated that he believes Deckard is human (saying that "[Ridley Scott's] idea is too complex"), but also repeated that he prefers the film to remain ambiguous: "I like asking the question and I like it to be asked but I think it’s nonsense to answer it. That’s not interesting to me." [19]
  • Ridley Scott stated in an interview in 2002 that he considers Deckard a replicant.[20][21]
  • Harrison Ford considers Deckard to be human. "That was the main area of contention between Ridley and myself at the time," Ford told interviewer Jonathan Ross during a BBC1 Hollywood Greats segment. "I thought the audience deserved one human being on screen that they could establish an emotional relationship with. I thought I had won Ridley's agreement to that, but in fact I think he had a little reservation about that. I think he really wanted to have it both ways."[22] (However, in an interview in Wired magazine in 2007, Ridley again states that he believes Deckard is a replicant, and says that Harrison Ford may have given up the idea of Deckard being human.)[23]
  • Edward James Olmos (Detective Gaff) explains that Deckard was also a replicant.[24]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Themes_in_Blade_Runner
__________________
May fortune favor the foolish

MaddogK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.