SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > SH4 Mods Workshop
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-11, 07:59 AM   #1
Karle94
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norseland
Posts: 1,355
Downloads: 253
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
Actually even that is a little short. The longest hit ever made on a moving target was by Scharnhorst on HMS Glorious at 26,465 yards, or 24,200 metres. You're right, they almost certainly wouldn't shoot at a submarine at that range, firstly because subs sit lower in the water and are harder to see, and secondly because they wouldn't waste their big-gun ammo on a target so hard to hit. On the other hand the US battleships Iowa and New Jersey did try to hit the Japanese destroyer Nowaki at more than 35,000 yards, or 32,000 metres, so you never know for sure what they'll actually do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hylander_1314 View Post
Dang! 35,000 yards! Close to 18nms!

That is amazing that they would fire at that distance to try to hit something as small as a destroyer at that range.
Did´t they barely miss that destroyer?
__________________



Find my mods here:
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/lzgciodldp58p/SH4_Mods
My SH4 blog here:
http://karle94.blogspot.com/
Karle94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-11, 12:14 PM   #2
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

The time of flight for a 16"/50 shell at 35,000 yards is more than a minute. I've read that Nowaki would wait for the muzzle flash from the battleships and then turn and run in a different direction. I don't have a source for that, however. That said, they never hit Nowaki.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-11, 01:58 PM   #3
Karle94
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norseland
Posts: 1,355
Downloads: 253
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
The time of flight for a 16"/50 shell at 35,000 yards is more than a minute. I've read that Nowaki would wait for the muzzle flash from the battleships and then turn and run in a different direction. I don't have a source for that, however. That said, they never hit Nowaki.
I read somewhere that they straddled it. The Iowa sank the Katori in same egagement. Sank her after the fifth salvo.
__________________



Find my mods here:
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/lzgciodldp58p/SH4_Mods
My SH4 blog here:
http://karle94.blogspot.com/
Karle94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-11, 05:31 PM   #4
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karle94 View Post
I read somewhere that they straddled it. The Iowa sank the Katori in same egagement. Sank her after the fifth salvo.
A brief account of the entire battle can be found here http://www.combinedfleet.com/katori_t.htm starting with the dates 17-18 February 1944.

That account says that Iowa "closed with Katori", so the range was probably quite a bit less. On the other hand here is a discussion from a few years back that claims that Iowa did not hit Katori, at least with her main battery. That poster states that Iowa only hit a destroyer and an auxiliary ship with her secondary 5" guns. I'm still looking for a more detailed account.
http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5270

[edit] A little further down the poster Tiornu states that Iowa's own after-action report claims they did hit Katori, and with the main battery. I used to correspond semi-regularly with Tiornu (real name Richard Worth) and own one of his books. I trust his judgement an qualifications, so it's probably true. Either way it's an interesting discussion.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-11, 05:39 PM   #5
Karle94
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norseland
Posts: 1,355
Downloads: 253
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
A brief account of the entire battle can be found here http://www.combinedfleet.com/katori_t.htm starting with the dates 17-18 February 1944.

That account says that Iowa "closed with Katori", so the range was probably quite a bit less. On the other hand here is a discussion from a few years back that claims that Iowa did not hit Katori, at least with her main battery. That poster states that Iowa only hit a destroyer and an auxiliary ship with her secondary 5" guns. I'm still looking for a more detailed account.
http://warships1discussionboards.yuku.com/topic/5270

[edit] A little further down the poster Tiornu states that Iowa's own after-action report claims they did hit Katori, and with the main battery. I used to correspond semi-regularly with Tiornu (real name Richard Worth) and own one of his books. I trust his judgement an qualifications, so it's probably true. Either way it's an interesting discussion.
I have read several places that it was the Iowa that sank her. The Katori had many huge holes in her, not typical of a 20 kg 5" shell. The place that I read about the battle said she fired High Capacity shells (HE). Those shells weight almost 900 kg. Maybe this might add to the confusion, since those shells would make smaller holes than the 1200 kg super heavy AP shells.
__________________



Find my mods here:
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/lzgciodldp58p/SH4_Mods
My SH4 blog here:
http://karle94.blogspot.com/
Karle94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.