SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > SHIII Mods Workshop
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-06-11, 09:08 AM   #1
HW3
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gresham Oregon
Posts: 6,579
Downloads: 458
Uploads: 0


Default

I've actually made it to the end of the war in GWX but, it sure wasn't easy.
__________________


"Some ships are designed to sink...others require our assistance." Nathan Zelk
HW3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-11, 10:20 AM   #2
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,781
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HW3 View Post
I've actually made it to the end of the war in GWX but, it sure wasn't easy.
Same here and I suspect a good many others.
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is online   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-11, 12:21 PM   #3
Stiebler
Fuel Supplier
 
Stiebler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,237
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 4


Default

LGN1 said:
Quote:
I'm reluctant to change any sensor parameter without proper testing and understanding of the relationship between this parameter and the other.

As long as one does not know the real effect of varying the MiniumumSurface value, I think a better solution would be to randomly set the max. height parameter of the ASDIC sensor depending on the water depth. This would be a much better 'controllable' approach.
So far as I am aware, the only result of changing the minimum surface area is to change the ease with which the target is acquired by asdic. You may be right, that a value of 0.0 will be replaced internally by a default value; it certainly happens for one of the U-boat mass measurements, I forget which.

However, it is impractical to use maximum heights of sensors because they can vary. Remember that the name of the sensor is not associated with the data, therefore it is essential to tag the asdic minimum surfaces with some unique value. (0.0 is not unique here, incidentally.)

I've done a lot of testing with current asdic sensor values today, and they seem to be quite good. In shallow water (<50m deep), the escorts can still locate a VII U-boat with minimum surface=300, although they lose contact fairly quickly. But that is what we want.

Another factor is that probably the tiny type XXIII will NOT be located by asdic in shallow water. And that is correct too (more or less).

Stiebler.
Stiebler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-11, 06:32 PM   #4
Rhodes
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Figueira da Foz, Portugal
Posts: 4,520
Downloads: 110
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbuna View Post
Same here and I suspect a good many others.
Ideed! I love the idea since normally I tend to patrolling the UK waters for realism/immersion and got mix results like, a few times I detect the destroyers but they pass and do not find me. If one manages to detect me, there is no way to escape it, plus the shallow water= kaput!
Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.