SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-06-11, 11:50 AM   #1
kraznyi_oktjabr
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Republiken Finland
Posts: 1,803
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
Default

Platabus could you as a pilot answer to small question? It was mentioned that there is restricted airspace of 30 miles in diameter. From edge of restriced airspace how long it would take for Piper Cub to reach center? If we assume that president is in that location and that aircraft is flying in relatively low altitude, how much warning time Secret Service would have?
__________________
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic. - Dr. House
kraznyi_oktjabr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-11, 12:00 PM   #2
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,402
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kraznyi_oktjabr View Post
Platabus could you as a pilot answer to small question? It was mentioned that there is restricted airspace of 30 miles in diameter. From edge of restriced airspace how long it would take for Piper Cub to reach center? If we assume that president is in that location and that aircraft is flying in relatively low altitude, how much warning time Secret Service would have?
First of all, it has been over 20 years since I last flew so I am not a knowledgeable source for the size of prohibited airspace. There are other members much more current and knowledgeable than I am on these.

Taking your 30 mile diameter circle as given, it would depend on the exact model of the J3. J3's had different engines. But let's assume an "average" J3 speed of between 65 and 75 knots

To get to the center of your 30 mile circle (15 mile) would take about 12 minutes. A little less if the pilot is diving and has no intention of surviving.

The payload of the J3 is about 500 pounds. That's a lot of explosive that could be carried.

Not saying that a J3 is the uber weapon of choice, but I would hardly dismiss the threat of a J3 in the hands of a dedicated Bad Guy.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-11, 12:04 PM   #3
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 191,044
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Platapus View Post
First of all, it has been over 20 years since I last flew so I am not a knowledgeable source for the size of prohibited airspace. There are other members much more current and knowledgeable than I am on these.

Taking your 30 mile diameter circle as given, it would depend on the exact model of the J3. J3's had different engines. But let's assume an "average" J3 speed of between 65 and 75 knots

To get to the center of your 30 mile circle (15 mile) would take about 12 minutes. A little less if the pilot is diving and has no intention of surviving.

The payload of the J3 is about 500 pounds. That's a lot of explosive that could be carried.

Not saying that a J3 is the uber weapon of choice, but I would hardly dismiss the threat of a J3 in the hands of a dedicated Bad Guy.
Rgr that....a cunning and effective method of delivery to someone determined to get past security measures already in place on the ground.
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-11, 12:13 PM   #4
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,402
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

I wonder if modern heat seeking missiles would even lock on to a J3?

Especially when you have 10 minutes. That's not a long time, especially when some of that time will be spent evaluating the thread and deploying defenses.

Imagine a J3 diving with the engine off how would you shoot it down?

Would a stinger type weapon be able to lock on to a stopped J3 engine?

Small arms fire is probably not going to do it.

You can poke a lot of holes in a J3 and unless you hit the main wing beam it might keep on its ballistic course. I suppose a 20 mm round on the engine or the explosive payload would take care of it, but how hard would that be to accomplish?

I hope the USSS has already figured this out.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-11, 12:41 PM   #5
mobucks
Seasoned Skipper
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 713
Downloads: 209
Uploads: 0
Default

Kinda negligent to turn off your radio in a private plane. Bad airmen(woman)ship if you ask me.

Its nice to know at least the people in place for security do their jobs.
mobucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-11, 01:08 PM   #6
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,402
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

It is important to recognize that this was not some prohibited zone in the middle of nowhere. This was centered on O'hare Airport, which gets a little busy at times. O'hare is the third busiest airport in the world.

What was she doing flying within 30 miles of O'Hare without her radio on? Even if it is not required due to airspace designations for that area/altitude, wouldn't you think it would be a good idea to have it on?

Besides, part of the Private Pilot's education is non-radio air intercepts. When these F-16's intercepted her, they did it in an specific manner that communicates their intention. She must have a pretty high self image if she thinks that F-16's would fly close to her just to admire her and her aircraft. Planes don't do that, they maintain separation, especially military jets and civilian props.

I think this lady needs to lose her ticket until she goes through some remedial training. She does not seem to have the judgment expected of a pilot operating in crowded airspace.

Here is a nice FAA document that describes Temporary Flight Restricted Zones and at the end of the document covers the interception procedure including non-radio communication.

http://www.faa.gov/pilots/safety/not...dia/tfrweb.pdf
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-11, 04:19 AM   #7
Krauter
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,983
Downloads: 102
Uploads: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Platapus View Post
It is important to recognize that this was not some prohibited zone in the middle of nowhere. This was centered on O'hare Airport, which gets a little busy at times. O'hare is the third busiest airport in the world.

What was she doing flying within 30 miles of O'Hare without her radio on? Even if it is not required due to airspace designations for that area/altitude, wouldn't you think it would be a good idea to have it on?

Besides, part of the Private Pilot's education is non-radio air intercepts. When these F-16's intercepted her, they did it in an specific manner that communicates their intention. She must have a pretty high self image if she thinks that F-16's would fly close to her just to admire her and her aircraft. Planes don't do that, they maintain separation, especially military jets and civilian props.

I think this lady needs to lose her ticket until she goes through some remedial training. She does not seem to have the judgment expected of a pilot operating in crowded airspace.

Here is a nice FAA document that describes Temporary Flight Restricted Zones and at the end of the document covers the interception procedure including non-radio communication.

http://www.faa.gov/pilots/safety/not...dia/tfrweb.pdf
Agree whole heartedly. Just seems negligent and really stupid after reading her comments...
__________________
Quote:
The U.S almost went to war over some missles in Cuba... Thank god the X-Men were there to save us right?
Krauter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-11, 01:11 PM   #8
kraznyi_oktjabr
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Republiken Finland
Posts: 1,803
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
Default

Thank you Platabus. I read about Piper J-3 and I understood that its cruise speed is just 65 knots which is about 75 mph (121 km/h). Wouldn't it make sense to fly in low altitude in same direction with highways and try to make aircraft to look like being just one more car speeding in road for radar operator?
__________________
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic. - Dr. House
kraznyi_oktjabr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-11, 01:15 PM   #9
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,402
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

I am sure there are advantages of approaching at all altitudes. Not being an suicidal terrorist, I can't opine on which would be the best.

Since the J3 could legally approach until the edge of the TFR zone, I would imagine a higher altitude for the dive speed might be better. The lower altitude makes you more vulnerable to small arms fire and kills the ballistic trajectory option.

It is an intriguing problem to consider.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-11, 03:14 PM   #10
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 191,044
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Platapus View Post
I wonder if modern heat seeking missiles would even lock on to a J3?

I hope the USSS has already figured this out.

Possibly radar guided?
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-11, 03:17 PM   #11
MH
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,184
Downloads: 248
Uploads: 0
Default

Maybe optical image recognition....
MH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-11, 03:42 PM   #12
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,402
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbuna View Post
Possibly radar guided?
The RCS of a J3 head on would be significant

Quote:
Originally Posted by MH View Post
Maybe optical image recognition....
That would be the best. Do we have any ManPads that use that system? I am not a Manpad guy.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.