New York Gay Marriage: First Gay Couples Marry At Midnight

I just find it funny that after showing yourself as a holocaust denier and nazi apologist you decide to further exhibit the levels of your ignorance and bigotry.

[ZeeWolf]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

I just find it funny that after showing yourself as a holocaust denier and nazi apologist you decide to further exhibit the levels of your ignorance and bigotry.

That's simply because I do not need or value approval from guys like you.

[Morts]

Originally Posted by ZeeWolf

That's simply because I do not need or value approval from guys like you.

Guess you'd prefer approval by someone like Breivik ?
Then some "special" approval from him later

[ZeeWolf]

Originally Posted by Morts

Guess you'd prefer approval by someone like Breivik ?
Then some "special" approval from him later

Look anyone who will get off there behind and actually do SOMETHING is someone guys like you already hate.

Haters have got to hate ,unfortunately he can't be ignored because of mod status so the easiest thing is starve the troll and not respond to his drivel!
As for New York hopefully other places and countries will follow ,we're in 2011 not the dark ages so discrimination and bigotry has no place in modern society!

[Alex]

Originally Posted by darius359au

we're in 2011 not the dark ages so discrimination and bigotry has no place in modern society!

Going from this point to saying every change is an improvement, is a thin line that a few people cross gleefully, with a level of self-exaltation bordering on absurdity.

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by Alex

Going from this point to saying every change is an improvement, is a thin line that a few people cross gleefully, with a level of self-exaltation bordering on absurdity.

So you think discrimination and bigotry do have a place in our society?

Originally Posted by Morts

Guess you'd prefer approval by someone like Breivik ?
Then some "special" approval from him later

What does this post have to do with this thread's topic?

Are you taking Troll lessons from Tribesman?

You both play the same record, over and over again, regargless of topic.

[ZeeWolf]

OK here is some basic stats that I will use to establish the fact
that the "homosexual" has a much greater population of child molesters
(per capita) then the heterosexual population does even though
we are mislead into believing that child molestation is a heterosexual
thing and the "homosexual" is just miniscule.

Found here:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1556756

Previous investigations have indicated that the ratio of
sex offenders against female children vs. offenders against
male children is approximately 2:1, while the ratio of
gynephiles to androphiles among the general population is
approximately 20:1. The present study investigated whether
the etiology of preferred partner sex among pedophiles is
related to the etiology of preferred partner sex among males
preferring adult partners. Using phallometric test sensitivities
to calculate the proportion of true pedophiles among various
groups of sex offenders against children, and taking into
consideration previously reported mean numbers of victims per
offender group, the ratio of heterosexual to homosexual
pedophiles was calculated to be approximately 11:1.
This suggests that the resulting proportion of true pedophiles
among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater
than that in persons who develop heterosexually. This, of
course, would not indicate that androphilic males have a
greater propensity to offend against children.

This is more very revealing data here:
http://www.cpiu.us/statistics-2/
it includes the following excerpts:

A 1994 National Institute of Health survey of 453 pedophiles, conducted by
Dr. Gene Abel, showed these criminals were collectively responsible for the
molestation of over 67,000 children. That***8217;s an average of 148 children per
individual pedophile.

The statics that should be readily available to establish clear and concise
numbers concerning the male predators to male child victims is not easy
to compile or obtain and probably because this data would be so damming
to the sexual pervert's agenda to legalize all consenting sexual behavior
between adults and children. And, this sick agenda I am willing to prove
exists and a part of this "Gay marriage"movement. But one thing at a time

to be continued...

ZeeWolf

[Betonov]

Originally Posted by ZeeWolf

OK here is some basic stats that I will use to establish the fact
that the "homosexual" has a much greater population of child molesters
(per capita) then the heterosexual population does even though
we are mislead into believing that child molestation is a heterosexual
thing and the "homosexual" is just miniscule.

Found here:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1556756

Previous investigations have indicated that the ratio of
sex offenders against female children vs. offenders against
male children is approximately 2:1, while the ratio of
gynephiles to androphiles among the general population is
approximately 20:1. The present study investigated whether
the etiology of preferred partner sex among pedophiles is
related to the etiology of preferred partner sex among males
preferring adult partners. Using phallometric test sensitivities
to calculate the proportion of true pedophiles among various
groups of sex offenders against children, and taking into
consideration previously reported mean numbers of victims per
offender group, the ratio of heterosexual to homosexual
pedophiles was calculated to be approximately 11:1.
This suggests that the resulting proportion of true pedophiles
among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater
than that in persons who develop heterosexually. This, of
course, would not indicate that androphilic males have a
greater propensity to offend against children.

This is more very revealing data here:
http://www.cpiu.us/statistics-2/
it includes the following excerpts:

A 1994 National Institute of Health survey of 453 pedophiles, conducted by
Dr. Gene Abel, showed these criminals were collectively responsible for the
molestation of over 67,000 children. That***8217;s an average of 148 children per
individual pedophile.

The statics that should be readily available to establish clear and concise
numbers concerning the male predators to male child victims is not easy
to compile or obtain and probably because this data would be so damming
to the sexual pervert's agenda to legalize all consenting sexual behavior
between adults and children. And, this sick agenda I am willing to prove
exists and a part of this "Gay marriage"movement. But one thing at a time

to be continued...

ZeeWolf

Interesting, very interesting. But it says nowhere in this recipee how you pre-cook the eggs so they don't break apart while you boil them together with the tomato sause

[ZeeWolf]

Here is the reason we need to agree first to a percent
And the term "Gay" is a term I do not use and refuse
to use to define this despicable behavior.


How many gay people are there in the United States?

The Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law, a
sexual orientation law and public policy think tank,
estimates that 9 million (about 3.8%) of Americans
identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender (2011).
The institute also found that bisexuals make up 1.8%
of the population, while 1.7% are gay or lesbian.
Transgender adults make up 0.3% of the population.


In his 1948 book, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male,
Alfred Kinsey shocked the world by announcing that 10%
of the male population is gay. A 1993 Janus Report
estimated that nine percent of men and five percent of
women had more than "occasional" homosexual relationships.
The 2000 U.S. Census Bureau found that homosexual couples
constitute less than 1% of American households.
The Family Research Report says "around 2-3% of men,
and 2% of women, are homosexual or bisexual."
The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force estimates
three to eight percent of both sexes. So who's right
-- what percentage of the population is homosexual?

Maybe less then 9 million but here is where your help in
research could come in.

ZeeWolf

[Gerald]

In NC, the logical explanation that there are about 200.000K gays in the area...

[ZeeWolf]

Originally Posted by Vendor

In NC, the logical explanation that there are about 200.000K gays in the area...

OK that's great Ventor, now we have to go through the crime stats.
The registered sex offender lists that lists the age and sex of the crime
victim.
Please note that rarely do these criminals have only one victim.
That is why the death penalty should apply to all these guys on these
sex offender lists. But that can be another thread.
Also there will be those guys who rape both sexes. They to should be
counted as those who rape little boys as well.

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by ZeeWolf

Please note that rarely do these criminals have only one victim.
That is why the death penalty should apply to all these guys on these
sex offender lists. But that can be another thread.
Also there will be those guys who rape both sexes. They to should be
counted as those who rape little boys as well.

All the above is true, and I don't completely disagree on the death penalty part for child molesters, though sometimes I think that might be a bit to lenient.

But men who rape little girls don't necessarily like women, and men who rape little boys don't necessarily like men. And if you could establish a correlation in a percentage of cases it doesn't necessarily follow that it's true in all cases. You consider homosexuality to be an abomination, partly because the Bible says so and partly because the idea disgusts you. That said, it's no reason to think that all gays are going to attack children. We punish offenders, not people we think are likely to be offenders. And we punish people for crimes committed, not for real or imagined "sins".

Here's a hypothetical: Suppose you can prove you are right. What is your answer? Ban gay marriage, sure. But what about homosexuals themselves. What do you want to do with them?

[ZeeWolf]

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

All the above is true, and I don't completely disagree on the death penalty part for child molesters, though sometimes I think that might be a bit to lenient.

But men who rape little girls don't necessarily like women, and men who rape little boys don't necessarily like men. And if you could establish a correlation in a percentage of cases it doesn't necessarily follow that it's true in all cases. You consider homosexuality to be an abomination, partly because the Bible says so and partly because the idea disgusts you. That said, it's no reason to think that all gays are going to attack children. We punish offenders, not people we think are likely to be offenders. And we punish people for crimes committed, not for real or imagined "sins".

Here's a hypothetical: Suppose you can prove you are right. What is your answer? Ban gay marriage, sure. But what about homosexuals themselves. What do you want to do with them?

That is why clearly defining the term 'homosexual' is essential. I personally
use the term to refer to adult males who engage in a sex/lewd act with
persons on the same sex. Children and adolescents (generally speaking) are already under to much pressure to experiment or may circum to seduction to firmly label them.
Whoever, it is the agenda that is the most sinister threat to Americans morality.