New York Gay Marriage: First Gay Couples Marry At Midnight

[Morts]

Originally Posted by ZeeWolf

That's simply because I do not need or value approval from guys like you.

Guess you'd prefer approval by someone like Breivik ?
Then some "special" approval from him later

[ZeeWolf]

Originally Posted by Morts

Guess you'd prefer approval by someone like Breivik ?
Then some "special" approval from him later

Look anyone who will get off there behind and actually do SOMETHING is someone guys like you already hate.

Haters have got to hate ,unfortunately he can't be ignored because of mod status so the easiest thing is starve the troll and not respond to his drivel!
As for New York hopefully other places and countries will follow ,we're in 2011 not the dark ages so discrimination and bigotry has no place in modern society!

[Alex]

Originally Posted by darius359au

we're in 2011 not the dark ages so discrimination and bigotry has no place in modern society!

Going from this point to saying every change is an improvement, is a thin line that a few people cross gleefully, with a level of self-exaltation bordering on absurdity.

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by Alex

Going from this point to saying every change is an improvement, is a thin line that a few people cross gleefully, with a level of self-exaltation bordering on absurdity.

So you think discrimination and bigotry do have a place in our society?

[Alex]

@ Sailor Steve : Honestly ?
Yes.
If bigotry and discrimination can keep people away from 1. acting odd due to their recent recognition in the media 2. caring about problems that are not problems really, but no more than the latest modish fad - to be forgotten next week - about to make people argue again and again with no good result to be expected in the end as that cause has no essential purpose, I say I'm all for bigotry and discrimination.

I'm not saying I'm against gays and lesbians, I've got no problems with them - as long as they stay away from me. They have always existed, and always will. I'd just like them to stay as tactful as I do regarding the love one person wishes to bring to another. That's why I can't see where's the need to bring that kind of news in the front page of your media.

[Thomen]

Well, I wish whoever wants to get shackled.. err married good luck and all the best..

I just hope they also put provisions for (gay) divorce into the law, too.

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by Alex

@ Sailor Steve : Honestly ?
Yes.

Interesting.

That's why I can't see where's the need to bring that kind of news in the front page of your media.

It's front page news because some people keep trying to repress it. If it had been accepted all along there never would have been any news. It's the bigots and haters who force people to respond radically, then complain the loudest about "those people" wanting "special priveleges".

Originally Posted by Morts

Guess you'd prefer approval by someone like Breivik ?
Then some "special" approval from him later

What does this post have to do with this thread's topic?

Are you taking Troll lessons from Tribesman?

You both play the same record, over and over again, regargless of topic.

[ZeeWolf]

OK here is some basic stats that I will use to establish the fact
that the "homosexual" has a much greater population of child molesters
(per capita) then the heterosexual population does even though
we are mislead into believing that child molestation is a heterosexual
thing and the "homosexual" is just miniscule.

Found here:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1556756

Previous investigations have indicated that the ratio of
sex offenders against female children vs. offenders against
male children is approximately 2:1, while the ratio of
gynephiles to androphiles among the general population is
approximately 20:1. The present study investigated whether
the etiology of preferred partner sex among pedophiles is
related to the etiology of preferred partner sex among males
preferring adult partners. Using phallometric test sensitivities
to calculate the proportion of true pedophiles among various
groups of sex offenders against children, and taking into
consideration previously reported mean numbers of victims per
offender group, the ratio of heterosexual to homosexual
pedophiles was calculated to be approximately 11:1.
This suggests that the resulting proportion of true pedophiles
among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater
than that in persons who develop heterosexually. This, of
course, would not indicate that androphilic males have a
greater propensity to offend against children.

This is more very revealing data here:
http://www.cpiu.us/statistics-2/
it includes the following excerpts:

A 1994 National Institute of Health survey of 453 pedophiles, conducted by
Dr. Gene Abel, showed these criminals were collectively responsible for the
molestation of over 67,000 children. That***8217;s an average of 148 children per
individual pedophile.

The statics that should be readily available to establish clear and concise
numbers concerning the male predators to male child victims is not easy
to compile or obtain and probably because this data would be so damming
to the sexual pervert's agenda to legalize all consenting sexual behavior
between adults and children. And, this sick agenda I am willing to prove
exists and a part of this "Gay marriage"movement. But one thing at a time

to be continued...

ZeeWolf

[Betonov]

Originally Posted by ZeeWolf

OK here is some basic stats that I will use to establish the fact
that the "homosexual" has a much greater population of child molesters
(per capita) then the heterosexual population does even though
we are mislead into believing that child molestation is a heterosexual
thing and the "homosexual" is just miniscule.

Found here:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1556756

Previous investigations have indicated that the ratio of
sex offenders against female children vs. offenders against
male children is approximately 2:1, while the ratio of
gynephiles to androphiles among the general population is
approximately 20:1. The present study investigated whether
the etiology of preferred partner sex among pedophiles is
related to the etiology of preferred partner sex among males
preferring adult partners. Using phallometric test sensitivities
to calculate the proportion of true pedophiles among various
groups of sex offenders against children, and taking into
consideration previously reported mean numbers of victims per
offender group, the ratio of heterosexual to homosexual
pedophiles was calculated to be approximately 11:1.
This suggests that the resulting proportion of true pedophiles
among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater
than that in persons who develop heterosexually. This, of
course, would not indicate that androphilic males have a
greater propensity to offend against children.

This is more very revealing data here:
http://www.cpiu.us/statistics-2/
it includes the following excerpts:

A 1994 National Institute of Health survey of 453 pedophiles, conducted by
Dr. Gene Abel, showed these criminals were collectively responsible for the
molestation of over 67,000 children. That***8217;s an average of 148 children per
individual pedophile.

The statics that should be readily available to establish clear and concise
numbers concerning the male predators to male child victims is not easy
to compile or obtain and probably because this data would be so damming
to the sexual pervert's agenda to legalize all consenting sexual behavior
between adults and children. And, this sick agenda I am willing to prove
exists and a part of this "Gay marriage"movement. But one thing at a time

to be continued...

ZeeWolf

Interesting, very interesting. But it says nowhere in this recipee how you pre-cook the eggs so they don't break apart while you boil them together with the tomato sause