![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#6 |
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Middlebury, VT, USA
Posts: 378
Downloads: 165
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
@Vendor:
I recognize that you are trying to be helpful, but could you please point out in my previous thread and specifically this follow up post, where I didn't "made [sic] it clear it directly?" I decided to post a new thread trying to be as explicit as possible, since I didn't get what I wanted out of the last thread (and to some extent it got hijacked). I was trying to do that since, clearly, I had done some research since my last post, and I thought it merited a new post, that would be much more clear and concise in exactly what I am asking for. It also states in the FAQ: "Please do not engage in 'topic spamming', where you post several threads on the essentially the same topic in a short period of time. If you want to discuss women's synchronized swimming, fine; start a topic on it. But don't start another topic on women's synchronized swimming clothing, women's synchronized swimming schedules, etc. for several weeks." The last post I made in that thread was 22 Jan 2011. Is ~6 months not enough time? I also know how to conduct research, as I spent a lot of time doing it to accomplish certain things. ![]() That is why I am coming here, because I have spent a lot of time searching many things (including "The Google") to look for an answer to these specific questions, and I have not found them. In my research, I have come across many of the links you posted, and I have used them for reference. What I am looking for now is a specific answer to a specific question. Now, in my experience, when I am asked to give references to a question that is that detailed, I usually automatically supply the reference with it, down to the book page if necessary. What you have chosen to do is dump a bunch of generally related links on me with a suggestion to use Google. One of the links is for the encounter between U-352 and the Icarus. Although the article is complete, he most likely used Hickam's Torpedo Junction as a reference, a book that I have in my library as reference. I cannot help but notice that this link has absolutely nothing to do with surface resupply, which specifically what I am asking about in this thread. All-in-all I can't help but feel a little frustrated here. I find it a bit off-putting to ask a specific question, have it misinterpreted and not answered, then get told that I need to do things that I have done, and I still don't get the answer I am looking for, all from a senior member of this forum. ![]() Please, help me understand, exactly what am I doing wrong here to deserve this treatment? |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|