SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-16-11, 02:41 PM   #11
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,447
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderseaLcpl View Post
Here's a question: Why weren't the control rods designed to simply drop into the core in the event of a power failure to stop the reaction?
In a BWR the control rods are raised from the bottom instead of dropping from the top.

Quote:
a full application of control rods should be enough to stop any reaction the plant is capable of generating.
Under normal circumstances, yes, the application of the control rods will prevent further fission. However, it will have no affect on the heat being present or even continuing after the fission is stopped. The problem is that if the reactor has a large void (negitive) coefficient , the increased heat (when the cooling system fails), may overcome the absorption effects of the control rod.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Void_coefficient

In plain words, the hotter the reactor gets, the less effective the moderator will be. Given enough heat, the control rods may be of minimal use.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.