![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Medic
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 159
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Even if Moscow fell many people say the Russian army will fall back behind the Ural mountains along with their industry and build up strength for a massive counter attack. Russia is a huge country so I don't see how German occupation would've been very practical without major help.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Electrician's Mate
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Latvia
Posts: 137
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Great thread would read again. Now where did our history teachers go? I wouldn't mind reading more of this. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Valhalla
Posts: 5,295
Downloads: 141
Uploads: 17
|
![]()
Failure to take Moscow by diverting troops South to the Caucasus was the real game changer. After that the real 'brains' in the German high command knew the war was lost.
As early as Jul 1941, the Russians knew the Germans were going to breach their defenses and threaten Moscow. On 3 Jul, Lenin's body was moved from Moscow to Tumen to prevent German capture or destruction. Little over two weeks later, on 22 Jul, 127 German bombers raided Moscow, even lightly damaging the Kremlin. On 2 Oct 1941, Fedor von Bock led German troops to assault directly against Moscow. German advances were slower than they had hoped with a rainy fall season and later a cold early winter. As German vehicles become immobilized, the German army continued to advance, however the cold weather was affecting the morale and fighting ability of the troops to a high degree. On 15 Nov, another push for Moscow was launched, and within two weeks the Germans reached the 27km marker to Moscow, with some soldiers claiming the sighting of the towers of Kremlin. The crucial fact was that Hitler ignored most of his generals who were pushing for taking out Moscow,which hadnt suceeded for Napoelon,and the German high command were still using his plan albeit modified for the 20th centuary to invade Russia.A daunting task in itself.Hitler was supporting a plan put together by Gen Von Losberg which aimed at driving for the heartland of Russias industry and oil,of which Stalingrad was the lynch pin.If Stalingrad fell,the way was open to the oil fields.That is why so much hinged on Hitler winning there. Stalingrad could have been won. Hitler was rightly concerned that if he marched on and took Moscow without neutralizing the Soviet army and Ukrainian food and steel production, his army would find itself in Moscow with strong and well supplied armies on its flanks and would be forced to retreat in winter like Napolean had. The belief was that the army had to be neutralized first and Ukraine captured before a successful campaign could be mounted on Moscow. In fact Hitler changed his mind, as was his wont, several times during the campaign. Some divisions were transfered from one army group to another several times before the Kiev pocket was neutralized and the drive on Moscow begain in earnest. It is possible that the Germans could have succeded in all three goals if they hadn't had orders change so drastically, so frequently. But a drive on just Moscow might have left the Germans in an extremely exposed salient. In which case they would have been slaughtered in the Soviet winter campaign. In my view a successful invasion of the Soviet Union would have had to acomplish four goals, with a fifth goal virtually impossible. The first four are capture of the grain and iron production in the Ukraine, neutralization of the baltic fleet with the capture of Lenningrad, elimination of the communication and transportation linchpin that was Moscow, and capture of the Baku oil fields or at least their neutralization with the capture of Stalingrad and Astrakhan. The fifth of course would be the capture of the Urals. Hitler actually did accomplish one of these. The other three he almost acomplished at one point or annother. Had the Germans been able to take and hold all four areas they probably would have won the war in the East. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Medic
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 159
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,288
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
The Imperial Japanese Army, in particular at one time favored a move north out of Manchuria against Vladivostok and Siberia as they saw Russia as their traditional enemy. A joint German-Japanese attack on the Soviet Union might have invoked some diplomatic protests from the US, but given the isolationist and anti-communist attitudes of the country, probably no military ones. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
After the battles around Nomonhan in the summer of 1939 there was never any realistic prospect of Japan launching offensive war against the Soviet Union.
The leadership of the Army in Manchuria had lost great face in defeat; one infantry division had been subtracted virtually in its entirety from the order of battle and another had lost almost all its heavy equipment and many of its soldiers. Much of the theatre air force lay in smoking piles on the Mongolian steppes and literally hundreds of Japanese soldiers had become prisoners of war and declared legally dead by the High Command. Like the bully who had been badly beaten by a former victim, the Japanese Army and military junta would bend over backwards to avoid antagonizing Stalin right to the bitter end. After Nomonhan the Imperial Navy's Southern Strategy became national policy and Japan turned towards areas in America's sphere of influence making a clash at some point, almost inevitable. The 'soft and decandent' Americans would be far easier pray than the seemingly formidable Bolshiviks so they told themselves. The thrashing received by the Kwantung Army on the Khalkin Gol by the Red Army was one of the decisive events of WW2. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Electrician's Mate
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Latvia
Posts: 137
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
But if I'm honest this won't really lead anywhere, I might as well tell you that Japan would have won if it had a star destroyer, well it would, but it didn't. I heard some ideas here about the capture of Gibraltar to effectively seal off any Allied shipping. But would a piece of rock really stop UK's fleet? I mean really, even if Germans had Gibraltar and put some coastal batteries on it, how long would it take for the Brits to get some BB's and CV's out? It's just a piece of land, the reason UK could use it so effectively was because they had a powerful surface fleet guarding a narrow pass, that base just gave them fuel and ammo, and all the other good stuff. Am I right in this, or do I miss something important? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,288
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Ultimately after the US oil embargo, Japan had no choice but to turn south as the Russian Far East lacked the one thing Japan craved most--oil. There were some operating wells on Sakhalin Island, but not nearly enough to meet Japan's needs. Plus, outside of Vladivostok the area lacked any sort of vital industrial or population center to aim as well, being mostly empty wilderness. The Russians if they wished could have simply traded space for time on a grand scale.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|