PERFECT SIM! What can we make out of SH5/SH3?

[rocker_lx]

For me a good game is about immersion, this does mean for me that the graphics can never be good enough. I agree when people say that a dream would be SH5 with the campaign, U-boat types, equipment and time frame offered by SH3 (and maybe GWX).

I have high hopes in the work of privateer. I think SH5 has a nice future, if he can create a possibility to add all those things into SH5.
Also thanks to TheDarkWraith for creating this nice experience with his cool UIs.

[Obltn Strand]

Don't know about SH4&5 but I have my suspicions...
or modding or computers for that matter

A decent submarine simulator should have zig zagging ships.

[Schwieger]

so... what prevents modders from making SH3 look like SH5 graphic wise?

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by Schwieger

so... what prevents modders from making SH3 look like SH5 graphic wise?

The transparent water is based on all-new internal stuff that, as far as I know, is impossible to retrofit. There is a mod that makes SH3's water look a lot like SH5's, but that whole transparency thing seems to be right out. Also, the ship models are much more advanced, using newer technology as well.

Originally Posted by Chaplain Lovejoy

Have been playing SH4 exclusively for several weeks, but no longer. The reason: too many CTDs (fully patched, with appropriate RFB mods). A necessary (but not sufficient) condition for a perfect sim is elimination of CTDs. Perfection is impossible, of course, but it still can be a target to aim for.

I find SH4 to be much more stable. I pretty much never get CTDs in SH4, whereas SH3 is very touchy about what's installed.

Originally Posted by Delareon

Sh4 has lots of potential i agree also, the thing which keeps me really away from playing it is the Crew. Ok the SH3 Crew isnt an eye-candy but the Sh4 Crew looks way too much like a comic from my oppinion.

This seems to be a matter of personal taste. I think SH4's crew are much more acceptable.