![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#31 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Those lines along the wing roots are unmistakable. Did our government fork over the plans for the Nighthawk or did Beijing snoop it out from under us?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,184
Downloads: 248
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
They just copied the Matchbox model.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I don't think it would be that hard for them to take the basic design and figure out how best to build such a thing even without the blueprints, unless they copied the electronics as well, which I doubt.
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Banana Republic of Germany
Posts: 6,170
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Forget what I said, I only saw the black lines of the rear parts of the wings and tail.
![]()
__________________
Putting Germ back into Germany. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ... sooner or latter the shoot down of #806 was going to bite us in the ass... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
Already bit you, I'd say Comrade PAK-FA benefitted a fair bit from #806, after all, that's where most of the materials went.
Then of course, you have the Russians playing the same game: ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() ...But then Clint Eastwood stole it... oh wait that was that other Soviet stealth plane... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Twas actually the Russians who developed the equations for stealth.
Just the US went and developed it and the materials. The theory has been out there for ages, the chinese have enough smart people to look at the many pictures of the F-22 to work it out. It all comes down to materials and electronics of which I'd say the Russians and the Chinese aren't that far behind. You can mump and moan all you want about the F-117 shootdown but I wouldn't be surprised if they were already working on it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CATALINA IS. SO . CAL USA
Posts: 10,108
Downloads: 511
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
20 to 30 yrs ? If most of you here aren't lieing about your age, you'll be close to being in a nurseing home crapping in your pants.
![]() Until some idiot leaders here, destroy our nuclear weapons and their delivery systems, China or anyone else for that matter isn't a problem. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() ... pray they are our geeks... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,272
Downloads: 58
Uploads: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Photographed at the latest Chinese air show...
![]() ![]() This one is from a while ago and is probably in service by now... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
Now they're just being silly...
Ah well, you make a good design you've got to expect people to ape it, after all, you don't put millions of dollars into R&D to find the most efficient airflow shape, you wait for the other rich guy to do it and then google it. Or there's the Tu-4 approach... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
We have a winner....
![]() Six Tomahawks went down in Pakistan in 1998 on their way to AQ targets in Afghanistan. Look what then showed up a few years latter... Pakistani Babur LACM: ![]() Chinese DH-10 LACM ![]() Chinese C-602 ASM/LACM ![]() How many UAVs have we lost over Pakistan? I bet Pakistan got a nice discount on their new Chendgu JF-17 jets for handing over the wreckage. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|