SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-01-10, 04:02 PM   #1
the_tyrant
Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,272
Downloads: 58
Uploads: 0
Default

Wikipedia told me that this guy killed a wounded solder
If i remembered correctly, that in itself is a war crime
the_tyrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-10, 04:29 PM   #2
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

That is weak, sorry.

The CIA drone pilot is not on the battlefield. The purpose of uniforms and rank, etc, is to distinguish combatants from noncombatants to minimize harm to the latter. The DRONE, OTOH, was certainly wearing a "uniform" that positively IDed it as an asset of the US, clearly distinguishing it from, say, an airliner. The DRONE is the combatant. Claiming the operator needed a uniform is like claiming that an infantryman's BRAIN should wear a uniform inside his skull.

What is on the BATTLEFIELD is what matters. being out of uniform in Virginia, has exactly zero bearing on the rules of war, and their purpose.
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-10, 05:13 PM   #3
Bilge_Rat
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: standing watch...
Posts: 3,856
Downloads: 344
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tater View Post
That is weak, sorry.

The CIA drone pilot is not on the battlefield. The purpose of uniforms and rank, etc, is to distinguish combatants from noncombatants to minimize harm to the latter. The DRONE, OTOH, was certainly wearing a "uniform" that positively IDed it as an asset of the US, clearly distinguishing it from, say, an airliner. The DRONE is the combatant. Claiming the operator needed a uniform is like claiming that an infantryman's BRAIN should wear a uniform inside his skull.

What is on the BATTLEFIELD is what matters. being out of uniform in Virginia, has exactly zero bearing on the rules of war, and their purpose.
perhaps...but the U.S. government's lawyers were worried enough that they rewrote the law, ...sorry "rules", just before the trial, ...sorry "hearing", to make sure the charge would only apply to that particular defendant.

I am usually a defender of U.S. actions and motives, but the "trials" at Guantanamo are as fair as what you would expect from a political trial in Russia. I hope the damage to the reputation of the U.S. around the world was worth it just to convict this kid.
__________________
Bilge_Rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-10, 04:36 PM   #4
Dowly
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 25,054
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_tyrant View Post
Wikipedia told me that this guy killed a wounded solder
If i remembered correctly, that in itself is a war crime
Didn't see anything about killing wounded soldier.
Dowly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-10, 04:38 PM   #5
the_tyrant
Admiral
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,272
Downloads: 58
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly View Post
Didn't see anything about killing wounded soldier.
Quote:
He has spent seven years in the Guantanamo Bay detention camps accused of war crimes and providing support to terrorism after throwing a grenade that fatally wounded a US soldier
from my best friend wikipedia:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_Khadr

Edit: sorry, my mistake
I read it as "a grenade on fatally wounded a US soldier"
the_tyrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-10, 05:18 PM   #6
Dowly
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 25,054
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_tyrant View Post
from my best friend wikipedia:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_Khadr

Edit: sorry, my mistake
I read it as "a grenade on fatally wounded a US soldier"
No worries, mistakes happen, just making sure I didn't miss something.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bilge_Rat View Post
I hope the damage to the reputation of the U.S. around the world was worth it just to convict this kid.
No one won't even remember this a month, two later.
Dowly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-10, 05:31 PM   #7
krashkart
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,292
Downloads: 100
Uploads: 0


Default

Khadr will. He'll remember every wrong that was done to him, everything that was denied him that he should have had to save his eyesight, everything that was done during interrogation to aggravate the pain of his injuries. If he didn't already hate the West, he has plenty of reason now.
krashkart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-10, 05:34 PM   #8
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

Call them POWs, and keep them until AQ unconditionally surrenders to us. THEN try any that are actually "war criminals."

Until AQ formally surrenders, they stay locked up.
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.