SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-05-10, 01:44 PM   #1
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

I agree, nothing more than hyperbole. Bomb the locks? LOL, it would have been fixed quickly. The IJN could have sunk all 3 CVs at Midway, AND taken the island, would have delayed the war by a few months at best. Japan had zero chance of winning the war, even if they themselves thought they had a 10% chance of winning right before they started it—and this required a negotiated peace. Negotiation was required before the new naval construction in the US started coming off the slipways in 1943. PH made any such negotiation moot, it would not happen. Japan loses.
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-10, 02:02 PM   #2
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 191,561
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tater View Post
I agree, nothing more than hyperbole. Bomb the locks? LOL, it would have been fixed quickly. The IJN could have sunk all 3 CVs at Midway, AND taken the island, would have delayed the war by a few months at best. Japan had zero chance of winning the war, even if they themselves thought they had a 10% chance of winning right before they started it—and this required a negotiated peace. Negotiation was required before the new naval construction in the US started coming off the slipways in 1943. PH made any such negotiation moot, it would not happen. Japan loses.
Yeah, I can buy that.....they were hoping to hang on to some of the raw material rich territory they had conquered through a negotiated peace from a position of strength (as they saw/envisaged it).
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-10, 02:22 PM   #3
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,305
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Yes sir. I was all about raw materials plus the fact everyone else was doing the land grab! The I-400 would not have turned the outcome of the war.
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-10, 02:35 PM   #4
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 191,561
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk View Post
Yes sir. I was all about raw materials plus the fact everyone else was doing the land grab! The I-400 would not have turned the outcome of the war.
I doubt it would have even scratched the surface.

Might just as well say Surcouf would have done similar for the French.
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-10, 03:08 PM   #5
TheSatyr
Captain
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 545
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

I dunno...a bombing raid with biological weapons on a West Coast city would have shocked the US nearly as much as Pearl Harbor did. Even if only 3 planes were involved.

Never underestimate the psychological and political effects of WMDs. Would it have won the war? Of course not. But,it might have caused problems politically for Truman.
TheSatyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-10, 03:14 PM   #6
Raptor1
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Small scale WMD usage (As I pointed out in the numerous discussions about Germany winning the war) does not have the same effect on a victorious population as it does on a defeated population; if anything, it would've made the American public even more willing to defeat Japan.
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory
Raptor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-10, 04:56 PM   #7
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 191,561
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor1 View Post
Small scale WMD usage (As I pointed out in the numerous discussions about Germany winning the war) does not have the same effect on a victorious population as it does on a defeated population; if anything, it would've made the American public even more willing to defeat Japan.
Which is precisely what happened with the British populace when Hitler started the London Blitz.....not only did it fail to demoralise them but in fact it simply strengthened they're resolve.
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-10, 03:33 PM   #8
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,305
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSatyr View Post
I dunno...a bombing raid with biological weapons on a West Coast city would have shocked the US nearly as much as Pearl Harbor did. Even if only 3 planes were involved.

Never underestimate the psychological and political effects of WMDs. Would it have won the war? Of course not. But,it might have caused problems politically for Truman.
The Japanese tried the bombings but using balloons. I believe some of these balloons did make landfall on the west coast of the US.
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-10, 03:46 PM   #9
Weiss Pinguin
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Auburn, Alabama
Posts: 3,333
Downloads: 101
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk View Post
The Japanese tried the bombings but using balloons. I believe some of these balloons did make landfall on the west coast of the US.
Japanese Fire balloons (as told by wikipedia)
Quote:
Japan released the first of these bomb-bearing balloons on November 3, 1944. They were found in Alaska, Washington, Oregon, California, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, Texas, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Michigan and Iowa, as well as Mexico and Canada.

General Kusaba's men launched over 9,000 balloons throughout the course of the project. The Japanese expected 10% (around 900) of them to reach America, which is also what is currently believed by researchers. About 300 balloon bombs were found or observed in America. It remains likely that more balloon bombs lie unexploded in the forests, deserts, lakes and mountains of North America.
And the only known casualties caused by the fire balloons:
Quote:
On May 5, 1945, a pregnant woman and five children were killed when they discovered a balloon bomb that had landed in the forest of Gearhart Mountain in southern Oregon. Pastor Archie Mitchell and his pregnant wife Elsye drove up to Gearhart Mountain with five of their Sunday school students (aged 11-14)to have a picnic, and Elsye and the children got out of the car while Archie drove on to find a parking spot. As Elsye and the children looked for a good picnic spot, they saw a strange balloon lying on the ground. As the group approached the balloon, a bomb attached to it exploded and Elsye and all five children were killed. Archie witnessed the explosion and immediately ran to the scene and used his hands to extinguish the fire on his wife's and the children's clothing, but he could not save them. [7] They are the only known deaths on the continental U.S. as the result of enemy action during WWII. They are also the only known deaths caused by the balloon bombs.
__________________
Weiss Pinguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-10, 03:46 PM   #10
krashkart
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,292
Downloads: 100
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk View Post
The Japanese tried the bombings but using balloons. I believe some of these balloons did make landfall on the west coast of the US.
Yes, but most landed in sparsely populated areas. There was one that made headlines when it killed someone in Washington state or Oregon(?). I remember reading about the story back in grade school but the details are fuzzy. Looking for it right now.


EDIT:

Here, a website dedicated to the subject:

http://www.japaneseballoonbombs.com/


EDIT 2:

It was in Oregon. I was close. http://www.japaneseballoonbombs.com/...ombdeaths.html
__________________
sent from my fingertips using a cheap keyboard
krashkart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-10, 04:35 PM   #11
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSatyr View Post
I dunno...a bombing raid with biological weapons on a West Coast city would have shocked the US nearly as much as Pearl Harbor did. Even if only 3 planes were involved.

Never underestimate the psychological and political effects of WMDs. Would it have won the war? Of course not. But,it might have caused problems politically for Truman.
It would have driven home the requirement that he destroy the japanese more than we were already doing. Nothing more. It's like smearing meat all over your body, then climbing into a tiger cage and poking him, lol.

There is nothing the japs could have done to win the war. Nothing at all.
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.