[REQ]'No Map-Contact Updates' done properly

[tater]

Originally Posted by ddrgn

How any serious subsimmer could play with map contact updates on is well beyond me.....

How any serious subsimmer could think that the "contacts off" paradigm is even remotely realistic is beyond me.

OP is right.

The plotting should be done by the plotter. Are you the captain, or some junior officer? Which is it?

The player should make observations, and those observations should be plotted on the map FOR HIM BY HIS CREW. Guess what, he doesn't brew his own coffee, either.

If you "mark" a target without taking a proper range, the bearing should be drawn out as a line with the option for the skipper to add a guessed range, aob, etc.

If you take a range, then the bearing line gets laid, then a point placed for the target. Again, aob, speed, heading etc can be added by the skipper as an optional addition.

On a 2d or further observation, your crew (as their training taught them) connects the dots, and since they were also properly trained to use a watch, they now also have the speed.

That is realistic. Neither Silent Hunter option is realistic.

[mobucks]

I like the ideas of the OP, what id really like to see is a simple ( ? ) icon on the map whenever a contact is visually sighted, not showing orientation or speed. That would still be a dead giveaway as to range though.

rant
I dont really consider myself a serious subsimmer but a lot of the fun of the game is taken out by knowing the exact location and hostility of contacts.

As it stands, its just so repetitive to be drawing lines and intercepting at 90 deg AOB within 500m so basicly every shot is the same.

I dont mind doing the math for the speed/AOB, but the stadimeter not working really sucks.
end rant

[Sgtmonkeynads]

Just have any spotted ship show up as a grey line. Like what happens when your sonar picks up a contact while on the surface. You know it is there, but dont know how far away, speed, direction, etc. this would be the way I would want it. Would be more like someone calling out " ship spotted bearing 290" , and that is all the info you get untill you actually look at the ship.
Don't know about you guys but I think it would make for a better game.


The more I think about it, this could be done by haveing your sonar work while on the surface but limited to the visual range of your deck crew, but only while on the surface. Once you submerge it would work as normal.

[TopCat]

Besides, there's a bug in the game with plotting the objects. When you go to the Sonar station, use it by yourself and then leave again, all the sonar contacts on the TAI-Map are lost forever (they're still there on the navigatoin map). Very annoying, don't know if this can be fixed in a mod.

[ddrgn]

Originally Posted by tater

How any serious subsimmer could think that the "contacts off" paradigm is even remotely realistic is beyond me.

OP is right.

The plotting should be done by the plotter. Are you the captain, or some junior officer? Which is it?

The player should make observations, and those observations should be plotted on the map FOR HIM BY HIS CREW. Guess what, he doesn't brew his own coffee, either.

If you "mark" a target without taking a proper range, the bearing should be drawn out as a line with the option for the skipper to add a guessed range, aob, etc.

If you take a range, then the bearing line gets laid, then a point placed for the target. Again, aob, speed, heading etc can be added by the skipper as an optional addition.

On a 2d or further observation, your crew (as their training taught them) connects the dots, and since they were also properly trained to use a watch, they now also have the speed.

That is realistic. Neither Silent Hunter option is realistic.

If you think balloons on your map with accurate real time information along with the type of ship with a radius showing its sensor range is realistic, well than, what can I do but laugh. You crazy people are so skilled but hardly no how to mark a contact on a map when you see it. Sad really, IMO anyone playing with these updates on sucks hard at this game ;]

[tater]

Originally Posted by ddrgn

If you think balloons on your map with accurate real time information along with the type of ship with a radius showing its sensor range is realistic, well than, what can I do but laugh. You crazy people are so skilled but hardly no how to mark a contact on a map when you see it. Sad really, IMO anyone playing with these updates on sucks hard at this game ;]

Who said anything about the stock system in SH? Who would play any SH game unmodded to remove stuff like that, anyway?

Bottom line is that contact reports should be on if the game was designed properly. The captain is the captain, and should never have to plot unless he prefers to interfere with someone else's job.

The whole point is that the contacts plotted on the chart should ONLY be a function of the observations of the captain (player).

You observe, and bearing gets plotted.

You take a bearing and range, and bearing and range (the range YOU got) gets plotted.

No, the sensors should not be on the map, the map should look like a chart with pencil marks on it, period. It should not update in real time, either. Only via observation—and the skipper (YOU) should have to set which contact you are observing if you have the men plot more than one. So if you observe one liberty ship on the first observation, then mistakenly observe another on the 2d, your plots will be entirely wrong.

The plotter can default to drawing a course line ahead X minutes at a time as a straight line pencil mark.

What is sad is that the player is required to play with contacts off to have any sort of realism, AND do the job of a crewman instead of fighting the boat.

So you miss the point, the stock plotting system is 100% unrealistic either way. It needed to be thrown away and redone with SH5, but instead it's the same as SH4 (entirely broken).

[The General]

Originally Posted by thruster

would it be easy to make all map contacts grey?
im not taken by the idea of knowing a ships range of awareness. [perhaps im misunderstanding something?]

Yes, in Fig. 1 of the first Post, I made thethe surface vessel icon is black to represent this (Grey would be fine). Not identifying friend or foe automatically is essential. I have suggested this doesn't happen until you use (whatever optics you happen to be using) and click on the flag. For those rare occasions you spot an enemy sub, this woud be trickier (no flags!), but hey, that'd be more realistic too right?

Originally Posted by ironkross

I've noticed when clicking on my ship's course setting if there are any ships in the area the ship icons appear, revealing their positions for miles around. And if I drag the course setting lines around the ship icons move on their course. It's a terrible spoiler ingame, you can't help but know those ships are there. This needs to be fixed.

I have noticed this. Horrible bug , something to do with the Sonar Operators 'Special' ability to 'show all contacts' maybe?

Originally Posted by tater

No, the sensors should not be on the map, the map should look like a chart with pencil marks on it, period.

The stock plotting system is 100% unrealistic either way. It needed to be thrown away and redone with SH5, but instead it's the same as SH4 (entirely broken).

Yes, that is my point. It doesn't work properly either way. There are some very good ideas in each iteration of Silent Hunter. For example; in SH4 the Sonar suite works well, sending data to the T.D.C. Realistically the Captain would rarely use this equipment, but for gameplay sake it should be available. As should all other major systems.

[ironkross]

Originally Posted by tater

Who said anything about the stock system in SH? Who would play any SH game unmodded to remove stuff like that, anyway?

Bottom line is that contact reports should be on if the game was designed properly. The captain is the captain, and should never have to plot unless he prefers to interfere with someone else's job.

The whole point is that the contacts plotted on the chart should ONLY be a function of the observations of the captain (player).

You observe, and bearing gets plotted.

You take a bearing and range, and bearing and range (the range YOU got) gets plotted.

No, the sensors should not be on the map, the map should look like a chart with pencil marks on it, period. It should not update in real time, either. Only via observation—and the skipper (YOU) should have to set which contact you are observing if you have the men plot more than one. So if you observe one liberty ship on the first observation, then mistakenly observe another on the 2d, your plots will be entirely wrong.

The plotter can default to drawing a course line ahead X minutes at a time as a straight line pencil mark.

What is sad is that the player is required to play with contacts off to have any sort of realism, AND do the job of a crewman instead of fighting the boat.

So you miss the point, the stock plotting system is 100% unrealistic either way. It needed to be thrown away and redone with SH5, but instead it's the same as SH4 (entirely broken).

Yes why should I as captain need to leave my station at the periscope to run to the map table to mark a ships position?
I agree that there needs to be an option for "observed" contacts report, without the movement on the nav map, plus those that are received by radio.

Originally Posted by The General

I have noticed this. Horrible bug , something to do with the Sonar Operators 'Special' ability to show all contacts maybe.

I don't think so, some are way out of range of the hydrophones. I wish they were gone.

[Onkel Neal]

Originally Posted by tater

How any serious subsimmer could think that the "contacts off" paradigm is even remotely realistic is beyond me.

OP is right.

The plotting should be done by the plotter. Are you the captain, or some junior officer? Which is it?

I'm both. I prefer plotting ships with map contacts off. I do NOT want to see a real time, gods eye view of cartoony icons parading around on a map.
I think it would be nice if the TDC function wrote the results onto the map, to simulate the skipper calling out range, bearing, AOD (course), and speed.

But if that's not possible, make my map tabla rasa and I'll handle the rest.

[tater]

Originally Posted by Neal Stevens

I'm both. I prefer plotting ships with map contacts off. I do NOT want to see a real time, gods eye view of cartoony icons parading around on a map.
I think it would be nice if the TDC function wrote the results onto the map, to simulate the skipper calling out range, bearing, AOD (course), and speed.

But if that's not possible, make my map tabla rasa and I'll handle the rest.

I play Sh4 with contacts off because I have no choice. It's off—and I am forced to do the work of a few men—or magic.

I'd prefer neither. It's a CHOICE on the part of the devs, they have auto contacts on for the twitch crowd, which is fine, but they entirely misunderstand the way contacts were prosecuted, I guess, or don't care.

We can send contacts to the TDC. We can take two observations and get the speed with the TDC. There is no reason it could not draw the two dots on the map, then connect the dots. All the time wasted (yes, wasted) on interior nonsense could have been spent animating the plotter PLOTTING. Heck, you could watch him plot over his shoulder. THERE is an immersive animation, IMNSHO.

I never want the god's eye nonsense, that should have been clear, what I want is for the paradigm to be the player as skipper, nothing more, nothing less. It's odd, that in SH5 they went to that as an RPG-like notion to the extreme, but missed the most important part—that RPG element when fighting the boat.