Subsim fantasy football 2009

nikimcbee · 10-19-09, 08:00 PM

...So why did you start Hasselbeck over Brady?

1. Hasselbeck was supposed to be the hot qb of the week (see last week's performance). According to the experts

2. Houshmanzadhesdfgihsdfigyf + Burleson + Hasselbeck= (theoretically) all on the same page; lot's o' points. Anytime my WR scores points, I also get the points for the QB

3. Seattle @home

.
4. Dude, it's AZ

4. Bad weather in NE

Now, having said that, all of the experts were not picking MH as their qb. So I thought I'd take a chance on a big point payout and put all of my eggs in one basket...

Instead, the seachickens laid an egg, and Mr. TB reverted back to 2007 form and scored as many points as I was projecting for those other 3 combined

So, to put it in military terms, I pulled a monty and this was my operation marketgarden.

10-19-09, 08:00 PM	#34
nikimcbee Fleet Admiral Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Patroling the Slot. Posts: 17,952 Downloads: 90 Uploads: 0	...So why did you start Hasselbeck over Brady? 1. Hasselbeck was supposed to be the hot qb of the week (see last week's performance). According to the experts 2. Houshmanzadhesdfgihsdfigyf + Burleson + Hasselbeck= (theoretically) all on the same page; lot's o' points. Anytime my WR scores points, I also get the points for the QB 3. Seattle @home. 4. Dude, it's AZ 4. Bad weather in NE Now, having said that, all of the experts were not picking MH as their qb. So I thought I'd take a chance on a big point payout and put all of my eggs in one basket... Instead, the seachickens laid an egg, and Mr. TB reverted back to 2007 form and scored as many points as I was projecting for those other 3 combined So, to put it in military terms, I pulled a monty and this was my operation marketgarden. __________________