SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-19-09, 12:54 PM   #3
Cohaagen
Frogman
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 296
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

The welding on large German warships was actually defective. Several of them suffered catastrophic failures which led to the loss of their stern (including Bismarck). Lutzow, Prinz Eugen and Scharnhorst all suffered similar failures. Bismarck's armour scheme was also antiquated, and several inches thinner than contemporary British battleships.

There is still a strong belief, especially in the UK, that German engineering is superior to anything else - the British Army called this "BMW Syndrome" when trialling successors to the Challenger 1. After they found flaws in the turret armour of the Leopard 2, its supporters in the army still refused to accept that a German product could be anything less than materially perfect.

This feeds into assertion that Bismarck was scuttled, therefore clawing back a "victory" for the Kriegsmarine. I wonder if the supporters of that particular theory would then accept that the Royal Navy could equally claim that HMS York, Exeter, Sheffield, Sir Galahad, Ivanhoe, Encounter, etc. were not sunk by enemy action
Cohaagen is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.