![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Thats why clear nights are much cooler than cloudy nights. Oh and the 262 would have kicked ass...... if it had duration.. oh and that silly flame out problem.. and the explosive fuels... and... ![]()
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Banana Republic of Germany
Posts: 6,170
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() 1. The duration let a lot to be desired but it was enough to get up and shoot at your bombers. That's what it was meant for and it could do it. 2. All jets suffered from flameouts back then and the Me 262 had two engines and could easily fly with only one left (if it didn't happen on final approach where the pilot hasn't had the speed or altitude to react...). 3. Aren't you confusing that with the Me 163? ![]()
__________________
Putting Germ back into Germany. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Climate engineering should not be taken lightly. I can see both cloud-ships
and chemical methods of climate control having the potential to back fire badly.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|