![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Subsim Aviator
|
![]()
I think this is the current official policy.
![]() leadership a year ago... as well as the current leadership were / are far too anxious to brush their hands off and say "see America... that wasn't so bad now was it? arn't you glad we are done with that!?" unfortunately, i view the current Iraqi government as being a fawn taking its first awkward steps on trembling legs. (understandably so) i think when you have a well organized terrorist element in the country - you might as well have that fawn squarely in a hunter's rifle scope. i hope my views are mistaken. but im doubtful of that
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
In all honesty, what are the options?
Root out the terrorists? Good luck in that, you'll be in iraq & afghanistan still in 2050. It is just impossible task to do. Keep presence there? It helps, but it wont stop the terrorists entirely. One could even think that the recent decrease in violence is because the terrorists know US is pulling out and that they "have pushed the invaders out". Nobody knows how it would be, if there wouldnt be a set date for US to get out of Iraq. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|